The burden of unsubstantiated messaging: collegiate athletes’ chronic traumatic encephalopathy mechanism beliefs

ABSTRACT

Objective

To investigate factors associated with collegiate athletes’ beliefs regarding chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) mechanism.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Methods

A total of 838 collegiate athletes (61.9% men) from seven institutions completed a 10-minute survey that captured information relative to demographics, diagnosed concussion history, formal sport-related concussion education, additional sources of concussion information, and beliefs about multiple concussions and premature return-to-play following a head impact as mechanisms for CTE.

Results

More than half of collegiate athletes believed that multiple concussions (58.2%) and premature return-to-play (59.1%) may cause CTE. Those who reported getting concussion information from sports news had higher odds of believing multiple concussions and premature return-to-play were CTE mechanisms compared to those who did not get information from sports news sources. Additionally, CTE mechanism beliefs were significantly greater in collegiate athletes who were male, had sustained a previous diagnosed concussion, or had acquired concussion information from the NCAA.

Conclusions

Sports news’ reporting of CTE storylines, which highlight former male athletes with complex brain injury histories, may influence collegiate athletes’ beliefs about concussion. Therefore, it is recommended that concussion awareness initiatives incorporate information related specifically to CTE to empower collegiate athletes with evidence-based, patient-oriented information and knowledge regarding this condition.

KEYWORDS:

• Chronic traumatic encephalopathy
• concussion
• injury beliefs
• athletes
• college

Acknowledgments

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Declaration of Interests

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.