‘I had nothing. It’s just life experience that helped me through that situation’: Australian audiologists’ perspectives on audiological clinical practice for traumatic brain injury and rehabilitation

ABSTRACT

Objective

Australian Audiologists’ perspectives on standard non-specialized clinical practice in the context of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) were examined, including the perceived barriers to optimal service provision.

Design

A qualitative research design utilizing semi-structured interviews was conducted using purposive sampling. Nine participants were interviewed about their understanding of the impact of TBI on hearing and balance; identification, diagnosis and management of auditory and vestibular dysfunction following TBI; barriers to service delivery; training relating to complex clients (i.e., TBI); and awareness of referral pathways.

Results

Three major themes, each with subthemes, were evident in the data. The major themes reflected general considerations of audiological professional culture and specific issues related to knowledge of TBI and clinical practice with patients. Analysis revealed that professional culture seemed to act as a contextual barrier and interacted with the perceived lack of TBI related knowledge to hinder optimal clinical practice in this patient population.

Conclusion

Application of the biopsychosocial model, including interdisciplinary care in the management of patients with TBI, is needed. An improvement in theoretical and practical knowledge encompassing the wide-ranging effects of TBI is critical for the optimal audiological service delivery.

KEYWORDS:

• TBI
• audiological clinical service
• post-traumatic auditory and vestibular dysfunction

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the audiologists who participated in this study, and for sharing their views on the current audiological practice in the context of traumatic brain injury. We are appreciative of Dr Lyn Lavery’s advice pertaining to thematic data analysis.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This research was funded by the School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport (SAHHSS) 2020 strategic research grant scheme; La Trobe University, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport (SAHHSS) 2020 strategic research grant scheme.