592
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Tongue shapes for rhotics in school-age children with and without residual speech errors

, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 334-348 | Received 10 Apr 2018, Accepted 25 Aug 2018, Published online: 10 Sep 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Speakers of North American English use variable tongue shapes for rhotic sounds. However, quantifying tongue shapes for rhotics can be challenging, and little is known about how tongue shape complexity corresponds to perceptual ratings of rhotic accuracy in children with residual speech sound errors (RSE). In this study, 16 children aged 9–16 with RSE and 14 children with typical speech (TS) development made multiple productions of ‘Let Robby cross Church Street’. Midsagittal ultrasound images were collected once for children with TS and twice for children in the RSE group (once after 7 h of speech therapy, then again after another 7 h of therapy). Tongue contours for the rhotics in the four words were traced and quantified using a new metric of tongue shape complexity: the number of inflections. Rhotics were also scored for accuracy by four listeners. During the first assessment, children with RSE had fewer tongue inflections than children with TS. Following 7 h of therapy, there were increases in the number of inflections for the RSE group, with the cluster items cross and Street reaching tongue complexity levels of those with TS. Ratings of rhotic accuracy were correlated with the number of inflections. Therefore, the number of inflections in the tongue, an index of tongue shape complexity, was associated with perceived accuracy of rhotic productions.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Jessica Whittle and Ahmed Rivera-Campos for assistance with data collection and to Emily Wen-Hsin Ku, Rebecca Medwin and Corinne Walker for assistance with data coding.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Notes

1 NINFL ~ GROUP * CLUSTER + (1|ID).

2 NINFL ~ GROUP + CLUSTER + (1|ID).

3 RATING ~ GROUP + CLUSTER + (CLUSTER|ID).

4 RATING ~ NINFL + CLUSTER + (CLUSTER|ID).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders [R01DC013668, R03DC012152, R15DC016426].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 484.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.