26
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Translation, Validity, and Reliability of the Persian Version of “Keele Assessment of Participation” (P-KAP) Questionnaire among Community-Dwelling Older Adults

, , &
Received 29 Dec 2023, Accepted 03 Apr 2024, Published online: 15 Apr 2024
 

Abstract

Introduction

The Keele Assessment of Participation (KAP) is a clear, short, valid, and reliable questionnaire developed specifically to evaluate participation restrictions. KAP has been translated into various languages. This study aimed to translate and determine the psychometric properties of the “Keele Assessment of Participation” in healthy community-dwelling elderly people.

Methods

A forward/backward translation procedure was used for translating the KAP questionnaire into Persian. Older adults (N = 165) aged 60 and over participated. Content and face validity were evaluated. Convergent validity was assessed by evaluating the correlation between KAP and the short-form 36 (SF-36), and community integration measure (CIM). Internal consistency and test-retest reliability (N = 110) were determined by assessing the Kappa and Cronbach’s alpha.

Results

The content and face validity of the Persian version of KAP (P-KAP) were appropriately reported as good. The P-KAP demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.77) and test-retest reliability (Kappa = 0.82). The correlation between the P-KAP, the CIM, and the SF-36 total score was moderate and respectively −0.416 and −0.468 (p < 0.0001).

Discussion

The results of the current study found P-KAP to be an acceptable, reliable, and valid instrument.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the kind assistance of the aging adults who contributed to the study. We also appreciate assistance received from the Yas and Be vaght zendgi centers.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR.IUMS.REC.1400.1246). Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 643.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.