323
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
MANAGEMENT BRIEF

Effectiveness of a Fishway for Restoring Passage of Colorado River Cutthroat Trout

, , &
Pages 1332-1340 | Received 19 Apr 2017, Accepted 26 Sep 2017, Published online: 06 Nov 2017
 

Abstract

Little is known about the effectiveness of fishways for restoring passage to inland (nonanadromous) salmonids. We used PIT telemetry to evaluate the biological effectiveness of a vertical-slot fishway constructed to restore passage of adult Colorado River Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus clarkii pleuriticus (CRCT) in a small Rocky Mountain stream. Our objectives were to assess (1) fishway efficacy (whether or not the fishway restored fish passage), (2) approach efficiency (the probability that a tagged fish encountered the fishway; an index of population use), (3) attraction efficiency (the probability that a fish near the fishway located its entrance), and (4) passage efficiency (the probability that a fish entering the fishway navigated successfully through it). To account for antenna detection probabilities and avoid biases that can result from simple, proportion-based calculations, we used a variation of the Cormack–Jolly–Seber model to derive efficiency estimates. The fishway restored passage of adult CRCT to long-vacant habitats. Approach efficiency was 4%; attraction and passage efficiencies were 100%. We conclude that fishways can effectively restore passage of inland salmonids, and we recommend that additional fishway monitoring studies be conducted to inform decision-making and elucidate which designs and conditions will best facilitate passage.

Received April 19, 2017; accepted September 26, 2017Published online November 6, 2017

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank One Fish Engineering (S. Huhta and C. Huhta) for designing and fielding questions about the Poose Creek fishway; two anonymous reviewers for suggestions that improved the manuscript; R. Bennett, D. Lujan, A. Bachelier, B. Avila, J. Harrison, S. Poulos, and A. Rivera for field assistance; T. Carleton for collecting and processing discharge data; and E. Richer for equipment loans. Funding was provided by Colorado Parks and Wildlife, the U.S. Forest Service, and Trout Unlimited. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.