190
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Diagnosis

Stability of FeNO and airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol in untreated asthmatics

, MD, , MD, PhD, , MD, PhD & , MD
Pages 530-536 | Received 28 Jun 2016, Accepted 15 Sep 2016, Published online: 21 Dec 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Objective: Airway hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation are important hallmarks of asthma and are useful in asthma diagnosing, monitoring and treatment. The aim of the study was to assess whether two commonly used clinical tests, the mannitol challenge and Fraction of exhaled NO (FeNO), were stable clinical indicators over time in stable untreated asthmatics. Methods: 54 non-smoking, asthma patients not treated with steroids were enrolled in the study and assessed at baseline and a median of 6 months later. At baseline and follow-up, FeNO and airway hyperesponsiveness to mannitol were measured, and asthma control was assessed with the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ). Results: A total of 41 subjects completed both visits. Mean (SD) FEV1% at baseline was 94.1% (17.7) and at re-examination 94.6% (19.7) (ns). The ACQ score was unchanged from baseline (Mean (SD): 0.90 (± 0.73)) to follow-up 0.90 (± 0.74) (ns), as was the FEV1% (94.1% (±17.1%) vs 94.6% (19.7%)(ns) indicating that patients were clinically stable during follow-up. The response to mannitol was unchanged at follow-up (Geometric mean (CI) of Response Dose Ratio (RDR) to mannitol: 0.026(0.013–0.046) vs 0.026(0.012–0.050) (ns). There was a slight decrease in FeNO at follow-up (25.5 ppb (19.7–32.9) to 21.9 ppb (17.1–28.2) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In steroid-free non-smoking asthmatics with constant symptom scores and lung function, airway responsiveness to mannitol remained at the same level over a period of months, while a minor change in exhaled FeNO was reported. These results suggest that mannitol is a stable, reliable marker of clinical disease activity.

Acknowledgments

Authors Udesen and Westergaard have performed all clinical examinations, statistical work and writing. Authors Porsbjerg and Backer have contributed to the design phase as well as the statistical work and writing process.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,078.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.