Article title: Characterization of lipophilic extractives in the wood of anthocephalus cadamba and anthocepalus macrophyllus from progeny trial
Authors: Rizki Arisandi, Fatra Valahatul Ihda, Arif Nirsatmanto, Sri Sunarti, Anto Rimbawanto, Toni Herawan, Noor Khomsah Kartikawati, Liliek Haryjanto, Asri Insiana Putri, Fajar Lestari and Ganis Lukmandaru
Journal: Journal of Wood Chemistry and Technology
Bibliometrics: Volume 44, Number 03, pages 182–191
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02773813.2024.2334689
When the article was first published online figures 1, 2 and table 3 were published with incorrect values.
Please find the updated images and their captions as below:
a) with updated image and caption:
Figure 1. GC-MS chromatogram of n-hexane extract (F6) from A. cadamba (derivatization method). Peak 1. cycloeicosane (22.9 min), 2. E-15-heptadecenal (24.8 min), 3. myristic acid (25.4 min), 4. 1-eicosanol (28.3 min), 5. 1-tricosene (29.5 min), 6. palmitic acid (29.7 min), 7. octadecanoic acid (30.9 min), 8. nonadecanol (31.0 min), 9. 1-heneicosanol (31.5 min), 10. cyclotetracosane (33.7 min), 11. tetracosanol (34.4 min), 12. cyclooctacosane (36.8 min), 13. campasterol (46.8 min), 14. stigmasterol (47.5 min) 15. β-sitosterol (48.9 min), 16. stigmastanol (49.1 min), 17. lupeol (50.0 min), 18. lupeol acetate (50.4 min)
b) with updated image and caption:
Figure 2. Lipophilic extractive composition (%) based on dried n-hexane extract from A. cadamba and A. macrophyllus
c) with updated values and captions:
Table 3. Lipophilic components of n-hexane extracts from A. cadamba and A. macrophyllus.
The above listed corrections have been updated and the article has been republished online.