1,395
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Image-guided adaptive radiotherapy – integration of biology and technology to improve clinical outcome

, , , &
Pages 1182-1185 | Received 15 Jun 2008, Published online: 08 Jul 2009

The present issue of Acta Oncologica contains publications from the 6th Acta Oncologica Symposium held in Aarhus, Denmark, on June 5–7, 2008. This symposium was dedicated to image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). The purpose of the symposium was to evaluate the current knowledge in this field, which shows great promise with regard to improving clinical outcome of cancer treatment.

The concept of an Acta Oncological Symposium was developed nine years ago. The aim was to focus on an issue of emerging importance in oncology, preferably with a multidisciplinary approach. The topics of the five previous symposia have been sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer, prostate cancer, stereotactic body radiotherapy, normal tissue morbidity and breast cancer Citation[1–17].

Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is often used as a term to cover the technological procedures related to on-line planar or volumetric imaging of the patient in treatment position. By hosting this symposium we aimed to extend the IGRT concept to also include biological and functional imaging to include the concept of a response adapted target, also known as image-guided adaptive radiotherapy (IGART) Citation[18]. IGRT and IGART are tightly connected as they both rely on advanced imaging technology Citation[19], and share the same demand for high quality imaging tools for image management, registration, segmentation and analysis Citation[20–23]. In addition, both are prime examples of the individualisation of treatment which has been the main theme in the strive to improve radiotherapy in recent years. Key topics for the symposium, as well as the papers in this special issue, therefore included tumour delineation using CT / MRI / PET functional imaging, biological target volumes, dose painting, image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT), fiducial markers, cone-beam CT and other methods for on-line volumetric imaging, as well as adaptation of dose delivery based on anatomical changes. The organizers of the symposium invited a broad faculty consisting of distiguished international scientists within these research areas. Besides, many abstracts were submitted for the proffered paper sessions. The publications in the present issue of Acta Oncologica are therefore very much a reflection of the current international standard of the field.

The recent years development within radiotherapy in general and IGRT/IGART in particular fits the above Acta Oncologica Symposium criteria very well. Technical developments in radiotherapy with respect to methods for tumor delineation and treatment delivery have already showed promise to improve both tumor coverage and healthy tissue sparing. Regarding delivery, high precision conformal radiotherapy techniques like intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) as well as stereotactic radiotherapy have enabled target dose escalation with decreased volume of healthy tissue irradiated to high dose levels. However, the consequence of the increasingly conformal dose distributions is a higher sensitivity to changes in the patient between the planning and treatment situation. Setup errors and anatomical changes between and within delivery of each treatment fraction may cause deviations between planned and delivered dose distributions which can lead to underdosage of tumor volume and/or overdosage of normal tissue if not properly corrected for. While most setup errors can be avoided by conventional measures like rigid patient immobilisation and portal imaging protocols, the internal soft tissue motion and deformations occurring due to weight loss, tissue shrinkage, breathing motion or deformation of tumor/normal tissues require more sophisticated imaging and adaptive strategies. This may involve development of a new treatment plan on the basis of the new anatomic information. To this end, IGRT offers a possible solution and safety net. The recent advances in treatment-room image-guidance technologies Citation[6], Citation[24] have facilitated convenient and frequent imaging of the patient anatomy throughout the treatment course, and thus form a basis for treatment plan adjustments to the shape and position of target and organs at risk on a regular/daily basis. The use of IGBT for locally advanced cervical cancer has already shown the therapeutic potential of using such a response adapted strategy Citation[25]. In IGBT a very high dose is delievered according to repetitive imaging and target definition which take into account the tumour regression obtained by preceeding radiotherapy Citation[25]. Emerging clinical data show a very promising therapeutic profile with very high rates of local control and very low rates of morbidity with this technique.

With integration of biological information – in particular functional imaging – into treatment planning and high precison radiotherapy delivery, IGART represents a groundbreaking merge of technology and biology with a potential to improve clinical outcome. Improvements in anatomical resolution and the biological specifity of various functional imaging techniques like MRI and PET are encouraging, and also the integration into the treatment planning process are rapidly emerging. However, biologically adapted radiotherapy has so far mostly been documented in technical reports and small clinical feasibility studies Citation[26–32]. Obviously, the area is still in its early development and no proper clinical randomized trials exist to identify the indications for when and how to use image-guided adaptive radiotherapy. The present collection of articles describe to a large extent the current standings from which such clinical trials should take their starting point.

A large part of the symposium was devoted to clinical sessions covering tumour sites in the pelvis, thorax, head-and-neck and brain. In the pelvis, marker based (mostly 2-D) IGRT applications to account for geometrical uncertainties are well established for prostate treatment Citation[33–37], while volumetric imaging is findingly its place in the treatment of bladder Citation[38], Citation[39], rectal Citation[40] and cervical Citation[41] cancer. Breathing motion is the major challenge for tumour sites in the thorax, requiring imaging and treatment technologies to account for the resulting temporal variations in patient anatomy Citation[42–46]. In the head and neck, the presentations at the meeting covered tumour and normal tissue deformations caused by variations in set-up, weight loss and tumour shrinkage/growth, calling for treatment plan adaptation based on volumetric imaging Citation[47]. An interesting institutional review across tumour sites on the frequency and motivation for plan adapation based on findings from volumetric imaging was presented by the group in Portland, showing that 23% of patients treated according to a CBCT-based IGRT protocol were re-planned at least once during treatment Citation[48]. This will obviously have a profound impact on departmental workload, but hopefully, it will also pay back in terms of improved treatment outcome.

It is our hope that by gathering the key persons in this field at the 6th Acta Oncologica Symposium and collecting the papers in the current issue, new fuel has been added toward creating evidence of the potential clinical benefit from image-guided adaptive radiotherapy.

References

  • Overgaard J. Management of the axilla in breast cancer. Implication for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and morbidity. Acta Oncol 2000; 39: 259–60
  • Levitt S. Second Acta Oncologica symposium on prostate cancer controversies. Acta Oncol 2005; 44: 526–8
  • Grau C, Høyer M, Lindegaard J, Overgaard J. The emerging evidence for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 2006; 45: 771–4
  • Djärv E, Nyman J, Baumann P, Ekberg L, Høyer M, Lax I, et al. Dummy run for a phase II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy of T1-T2 N0M0 medical inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. Acta Oncol 2006; 45: 973–7
  • Fuss M, Shi C, Papanikolaou N. Tomotherapeutic stereotactic body radiation therapy: Techniques and comparison between modalities. Acta Oncol 2006; 45: 953–60
  • Hansen AT, Petersen JB, Høyer M. Internal movement, set-up accuracy and margins for stereotactic body radiotherapy using a stereotactic body frame. Acta Oncol 2006; 45: 948–52
  • Korreman S, Mostafavi H, Le QT, Boyer A. Comparison of respiratory surrogates for gated lung radiotherapy without internal fiducials. Acta Oncol 2006; 45: 935–42
  • Enmark M, Korreman S, Nyström H. IGRT of prostate cancer; is the margin reduction gained from daily IG time-dependent?. Acta Oncol 2006; 45: 907–14
  • Guckenberger M, Meyer J, Wilbert J, Baier K, Mueller G, Wulf J, et al. Cone-beam CT based image-guidance for extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy of intrapulmonary tumors. Acta Oncol 2006; 45: 897–906
  • Horsman MR, Nielsen T, Østergaard L, Overgaard J. Radiation administered as a large single dose or in a fractionated schedule: Role of the tumour vasculature as a target for influencing response. Acta Oncol 2006; 45: 876–80
  • Méndez Romero A, Wunderink W, Hussain SM, De Pooter JA, Heijmen BJ, Nowak PC, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary and metastatic liver tumors: A single institution phase I-II study. Acta Oncol 2006; 45: 831–7
  • Høyer M, Roed H, Traberg Hansen A, Ohlhuis L, Petersen J, Nellemann H, et al. Phase II study on stereotactic body radiotherapy of colorectal metastases. Acta Oncol 2006; 45: 823–30
  • Paludan M, Traberg Hansen A, Petersen J, Grau C, Høyer M. Aggravation of dyspnea in stage I non-small cell lung cancer patients following stereotactic body radiotherapy: Is there a dose-volume dependency?. Acta Oncol 2006; 45: 818–22
  • Baumann P, Nyman J, Lax I, Friesland S, Høyer M, Rehn Ericsson S, et al. Factors important for efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy of medically inoperable stage I lung cancer. A retrospective analysis of patients treated in the Nordic countries. Acta Oncol 2006; 45: 787–95
  • Nord C, Ganz PA, Aziz N, Fosså SD. Follow-up of long-term cancer survivors in the Nordic countries. Acta Oncol 2007; 46: 433–40
  • Aziz NM. Cancer survivorship research: State of knowledge, challenges and opportunities. Acta Oncol 2007; 46: 417–32
  • Overgaard J. DBCG: The Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group-a 30-year struggle for better breast cancer treatment in Denmark. Acta Oncol 2008; 47: 491–6
  • Greco C, Ling CC. Broadening the scope of Image-Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT).Acta Oncol 2008;47:1193–1200.
  • Nielsen T,Mouridsen K, Maxwell RJ, Stødkilde-Jørgensen H, Østergaard L, Horsman MR. Segmentation of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging data.Acta Oncol 2008;47:1265–70.
  • Brock KK, Hawkins M, Eccles C, Moseley JL, Moseley DJ, Jaffray DA, et al Improving image-guided target localization through deformable registration. Acta Oncol 2008;47:1279–85.
  • Noe KØ, de Senneville BD, Elstrøm UV, Tanderup K, Sørensen TS. Acceleration and validation of optical flow based deformable registration for image-guided radiotherapy.Acta Oncol 2008;47:1286–93.
  • Nailon WH, Redpath AT, McLaren DB. Characterisation of radiotherapy planning volumes using textural analysis. Acta Oncol 2008;47:1303–8.
  • Eilertsen K, Nilsen L, Vestad TA, Geier O, Skretting A. A simulation of MRI based dose calculations on the basis of radiotherapy planning CT images. Acta Oncol 2008;47:1294–302.
  • Verellen D, De Ridder M, Tournel K, Duchateau M, Reynders T, Gevaert T, et al. An overview of volumetric imaging technologies and their quality assurance for IGRT.Acta Oncol 2008;47:1271–8.
  • Pötter R, Kirisits C, Fidarova EF, Dimopoulos JCA, Berger D, Tanderup K, et al. Status and future of high-precision image guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervix carcinoma.Acta Oncol 2008;47:1325–36.
  • Xing L, Deng X, Kotedia K, Ackerstaff E, Ponomarev V, Ling CC, et al Non-invasive molecular and functional imaging of cytosine deaminase and uracil phosphoribosyltransferase fused with red fluorescence protein.Acta Oncol 2008;47:1211–20.
  • Roels S, Slagmolen P, Nuyts J, Lee JA, Loeckx D, Maes F, et al Biological image-guided radiotherapy in rectal cancer: Is there a role for FMISO or FLT, next to FDG? Acta Oncol 2008;47:1237–48.
  • Newbold KL, Partridge M, Cook G, Sharma B, Rhys-Evans P, Harrington KJ, et al Evaluation of the role of 18FDG-PET/CT in radiotherapy target definition in patients with head and neck cancer. Acta Oncol 2008;47:1229–36
  • Søvik Å, Skogmo HK, Bruland ØS, Olsen DR, Malinen E. DCEMRI monitoring of canine tumors during fractionated radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 2008;47:1249–56.
  • Daşu A Treatment planning optimisation based on imaging tumour proliferation and cell density. Acta Oncol 2008;47:1221–8.
  • Busk M, Horsman MR, Overgaard J. Resolution in PET hypoxia imaging: voxel size matters.Acta Oncol 2008;47:1201–10.
  • Røe K, Muren LP, Rørvik J, Olsen DR, Dahl O, Bakke A, et al Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of bladder cancer and implications for biological image-adapted radiotherapy.Acta Oncol 2008;47:1257–64.
  • Fiorino C, Alongi F, Broggi S, Cattaneo GM, Cozzarini C, Di Muzio N, et al. Physics aspects of prostate tomotherapy: Planning optimization and image-guidance issues.Acta Oncol 2008;47:1309–16.
  • Haskå TM, Honoré H, Muren LP, Høyer M, Poulsen PR. Intrafraction changes of prostate position and geometrical errors studied by continuous electronic portal imaging. Acta Oncol 2008;47:1351–7.
  • Carl J, Nielsen J, Holmberg M, Højkjær Larsen E, Fabrin K, Fisker RV. A new fiducial marker for Image Guided Radio Therapy of prostate cancer: Clinical experience.Acta Oncol 2008;47:1358–66.
  • Arnesen MR, Eilertsen K, Malinen E. Optimal treatment margins for radiotherapy of prostate cancer based on interfraction imaging.Acta Oncol 2008;47:1373–81.
  • Siddiqui, F, Shi C, Papanikolaou N, Fuss M. Image-guidance protocol comparison: Supine and prone setup accuracy for pelvic radiation therapy.Acta Oncol 2008;47:1344–50.
  • Redpath AT, Wright P, Muren LP. The contribution of on-line correction for rotational organ motion in image-guided radiotherapy of the bladder and prostate.Acta Oncol 2008;47:1367–72.
  • Wright P, Redpath AT, Høyer M, Grau C, Muren LP. The normal tissue sparing potential of adaptive strategies in radiotherapy of bladder cancer.Acta Oncol 2008;47:1382–9.
  • Ippolito E, Mertens I, Haustermans K, Gambacorta MA, Pasini D, Valentini V IGRT in rectal cancer.Acta Oncol 2008;47:1237–48.
  • Assenholt MS, Petersen JB, Nielsen SK, Lindegaard JC, Tanderup K. A dose planning study on applicator guided stereotactic IMRT boost in combination with 3D MRI based brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.Acta Oncol 2008;47:1337–43.
  • Korreman SS, Juhler-Nøttrup T, Persson GF, Pedersen AN, Enmark M, Nyström, H, et al The role of image guidance in respiratory gated radiotherapy.Acta Oncol 2008;47:1406–13.
  • Persson GF, Nygaard DE, Olsen M, Juhler-Nøttrup T, Pedersen AN, Specht L, et al. Can audio coached 4D CT emulate free breathing during the treatment course? Acta Oncol 2008;47:1397–1405.
  • Masi L, Casamassima F, Menichelli C, Pasciuti K, Doro R, Polli C, et al On-line image guidance for frameless stereotactic radiotherapy of lung malignancies by cone beam CT: Comparison between target localization and alignment of bony anatomy. Acta Oncol 2008;47:1422–31.
  • Jensen HR, Hansen O, Hjelm-Hansen M, Brink C. Inter- and intrafractional movement of the tumour in extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy of NSCLC.Acta Oncol 2008;47:1432–7.
  • Juhler-Nøttrup T, Korreman SS, Pedersen AN, Persson GF, Aarup LR, Nyström H, et al. Interfractional changes in tumour volume and position during the entire radiotherapy courses for lung cancer with respiratory gating and image guidance. Acta Oncol 2008;47:1406–13.
  • Johansen J, Bertelsen A, Hansen CR, Westberg J, Hansen O, Brink C. Setup errors in patients undergoing image guided radiation treatment. Relationship to body mass index and weight loss. Acta Oncol 2008;47:1454–8.
  • Tanyi JA, Fuss M. Volumetric image-guidance: Does routine usage prompt adaptive re-planning? An institutional review.Acta Oncol 2008;47:1444–53.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.