Abstract
Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of the combination of lercanidipine/enalapril versus amlodipine/enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide/enalapril on blood pressure, target organ damage and sympathetic activation in patients with grade 2 essential hypertension.
Research design and methods: This was a 3 month, randomized, blinded-endpoint study in essential hypertensive patients.
Main outcome measures: Office and ambulatory blood pressure, arterial stiffness, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio, renal arterial resistive index, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity were evaluated at baseline, after a 2 week run-in placebo period, at 1 month and at 3 months.
Results: In total, 56 patients were assigned to lercanidipine/enalapril (n = 19), enalapril/amlodipine (n = 18) and hydrochlorothiazide/enalapril (n = 19). Each pharmacological combination tested was effective in reducing office blood pressure at 1 month and 3 months, and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure at 3 months. Renal arterial resistive index (RI) significantly improved at 1 month and 3 months compared with baseline in all groups. However in the lercanidipine/enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide/enalapril groups, RI was favorably reduced (0.53 ± 0.03 and 0.54 ± 0.04 respectively, p < 0.05) in comparison with the enalapril/amlodipine RI value (0.57 ± 0.03) at 3 months. Moreover, after 3 months of treatment, a significant decrease (by -5.47 bursts/min) (p < 0.05) in muscle sympathetic nerve activity was observed in the lercanidipine/enalapril group (50.79 ± 6.49) compared with baseline (56.26 ± 6.05), while no differences were detected in the amlodipine/enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide/enalapril groups.
Conclusions: Our study provides evidence of the efficacy of the lercanidipine/enalapril combination in ameliorating hypertension-related target organ damage and in reducing sympathetic overdrive.
Transparency
Declaration of funding
Editorial assistance was supported by Recordati.
Declaration of financial/other relationships
K.T. has disclosed that he has no significant relationships with or financial interests in any commercial companies related to this study or article.
CMRO peer reviewers on this manuscript have received an honorarium for their review work but have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.
Acknowledgments
Editorial assistance for the preparation of this manuscript was provided by Luca Giacomelli PhD and Sara Parodi PhD of Content Ed Net.
Notice of correction
Please note that duplicate author names have been removed since the article was first published online (25 October 2016)