4,073
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Major Articles

Struggling with the basics: food and housing insecurity among college students across twenty-two colleges and universities

, Dr PH, RDNORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , PhD, RDNORCID Icon, , PhD, RDN, CSSD, , PhD, ORCID Icon, , PhD, MPH, RD, LDNORCID Icon, , PhD, , PhD, MPH, RD, , PhD, MPH, RDORCID Icon, , PhDORCID Icon, , PhDORCID Icon, , PhD, RDNORCID Icon, , PhD, RD, , MA, BS, , PhDORCID Icon, , PhD, RD, , PhD, RD, LD, , PhD, MS, MPH, RD, , PhD, RD, , PhD, RD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhDORCID Icon, , PhD, RDN, LDN & , BS show all
Pages 2518-2529 | Received 12 Jun 2020, Accepted 03 Sep 2021, Published online: 29 Sep 2021
 

Abstract

Objectives

To quantify the number and type of students failing to secure basic needs.

Participants

Students attending 22 postsecondary schools in the United States in Fall 2019.

Methods

The Adult Food Security Module and part of the #RealCollege Survey were used to measure food and housing insecurity, respectively. Logistic and linear regression models were used to assess the relationship between selected factors and basic needs insecurities.

Results

Participants (n = 22,153) were classified as 44.1% and 52.3% food insecure and housing insecure, respectively. Homeless students or those who experienced childhood food insecurity were at the greatest odds of college food insecurity. Year in school was the largest contributor to being housing insecure, with PhD or EdD students being 1,157% more likely to experience housing insecurity compared to freshmen.

Conclusions

High prevalence of basic needs insecurities remain. Current campus initiatives may be insufficient, calling for a more holistic approach at the campus, state, and national levels.

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated and/or analyzed in the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report. The authors confirm that the research presented in this article met the ethical guidelines, including adherence to the legal requirements, of the United States of America and received approval from the Institutional Review Board at West Virginia University.

Funding details

This work was supported by West Virginia University Experimental Station Hatch no. WVA00627 and WVA00641. The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 141.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.