1,308
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Study

Association of a low ankle brachial index with progression to end-stage kidney disease in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease

, , , , &
Article: 2160347 | Received 18 Aug 2022, Accepted 12 Dec 2022, Published online: 12 Jan 2023

Abstract

Introductions

The effect of a low ankle-brachial index (ABI) in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease is not fully understood. This study investigates the prevalence of a low ABI in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease, which was defined as a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) ≥300 mg/g and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between 15–60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Furthermore, the association between a low ABI and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) was determined.

Methods

This single-center, retrospective, cohort study included 529 patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease who were stratified into groups according to the ABI: high (>1.3), normal (0.9–1.3), and low (<0.9). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional analysis were used to examine the association between the ABI and ESKD.

Results

A total of 42.5% of patients with a low ABI progressed to ESKD. A low ABI was associated with a greater risk of ESKD (hazard ratio (HR): 1.073). After adjusting for traditional chronic kidney disease risk factors, a low ABI remained associated with a greater risk of ESKD (HR: 1.758; 95% confidence interval: 1.243–2.487; p = 0.001).

Conclusions

These results indicate that patients with a low ABI should be monitored carefully. Furthermore, preventive therapy should be considered to improve the long-term kidney survival of patients with residual kidney function.

Introduction

In 2017, 451 million patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) worldwide, and this number is expected to increase to 693 million by 2045 [Citation1]. The urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) are commonly used as screening parameters and clinical staging criteria for diabetic nephropathy [Citation2], a microvascular complication of DM. As the leading cause of hemodialysis in developed countries, diabetic nephropathy occurs in approximately 35% of patients with DM and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes [Citation3,Citation4].

The ankle-brachial index (ABI) has recently become a routine screening parameter for vascular complications in patients with DM [Citation5]. A correlation between the ABI and microvascular complications in diabetes has been widely reported [Citation6]. The ABI is calculated as the ankle-to-arm systolic blood pressure (SBP) ratio. It is a simple, noninvasive screening tool used to detect peripheral arterial disease (PAD) [Citation7,Citation8] as it reflects the aging and pathological state of blood vessels. An ABI threshold of 0.90 has been reported to have 90% sensitivity and specificity to detect PAD when compared to angiography methods [Citation9]. A low ABI (<0.9) is a predictor of cardiovascular disease, stroke, and mortality in the general population and in patients with DM and chronic kidney disease (CKD) [Citation10–13]. Atherosclerosis also contributes to the deterioration of kidney function, as a low ABI is predictive of future diminished kidney function and is associated with an increased risk of CKD and decreased eGFR [Citation14–16]. Additionally, a close relationship between low ABI and early-stage CKD was found in patients with diabetes with normal albuminuria [Citation15], suggesting that a low ABI level contributed to diminished kidney function independent of albuminuria. However, U-shape relationships between the ABI and eGFR, CKD, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality have also been reported [Citation9,Citation17].

To the best of our knowledge, no study regarding the association between the ABI and the progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease has been reported. Therefore, this single-center, retrospective, cohort study determines the effect of the ABI on adverse kidney outcomes and progression to ESKD in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease, providing a theoretical basis for its potential clinical role.

Materials and methods

Patients

This single-center, retrospective, cohort study included 529 patients with type 2 DM and advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease. Patients ≥18 years of age with type 2 diabetic kidney disease, an UACR ≥300 mg/g, and an eGFR between 15–60 mL/min/1.73 m2 who did not undergo kidney replacement therapy and for whom ABI data were available were included in this study. Patients with a baseline eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 and those with acute infections (such as pneumonia, diarrhea, cholecystitis, or end-stage cancers) were excluded from the study. The study was approved by the investigational review board of Jiangmen Central Hospital (approval number 2022103) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Clinical data

The patients’ baseline characteristics, including age, sex, DM duration, height, weight, medication list, and blood pressure were obtained from the medical records.

Data on the white blood cell count (WBC), hemoglobin level (HGB), platelet count, neutrophil count, 24-h proteinuria, UACR, liver function tests, kidney function tests, blood glucose level, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) level, serum albumin (ALB) level, blood lipid levels, eGFR, parathyroid hormone level, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and uric acid (UA) level were also obtained.

ABI measurement

The ABI was measured with the patient in the supine position on the same day that the patient’s kidney function was evaluated. The blood pressure was measured at the bilateral brachial and ankle arteries using an arteriosclerosis Doppler monitor (OMROM, HXV-ST 1, China). According to the American Heart Association guidelines [Citation18], systolic blood pressure is measured in each arm and in the dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial arteries in each ankle. The higher of the two arm pressures is selected, as is the higher of the two pressures in each ankle. The right and left ABI values are determined by dividing the higher ankle pressure in each leg by the higher arm pressure and the average of the right and left ABI was used for the analysis. In this study, the ABI ranged from 0.32 to 1.96; therefore, patients were categorized into three groups based on the ABI: high (ABI > 1.3), normal (0.9 ≤ ABI ≤ 1.3), and low (ABI < 0.9).

Calculation of eGFR

The eGFR from serum Creatinine was estimated using the modification of diet in kidney disease equation [Citation19] (CKD-EPI; MDRD Study): eGFR = 186 × serum creatinine−1.154 × age−0.203 × 0.742 (females) × 1.233.

Follow-up and study endpoint

The patients were followed up until December 31, 2021. The study endpoint was progression to ESKD, defined as an eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2, or undergoing kidney replacement therapy.

Statistical analysis

Normally distributed, continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Continuous variables with a non-normal distribution are presented as median (interquartile range [IQR]). Differences among the three groups were assessed using one-way analysis of variance, the Kruskal–Wallis test, or the chi-squared test, as appropriate. The cumulative, event-free probabilities of ESKD were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. A univariate Cox proportional analysis was conducted, and the relevant variables were included in a multivariate Cox proportional analysis using different models. The results are expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). SPSS statistical software, version 22 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA), was used to conduct the statistical analyses. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

A total of 529 individuals with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease were followed up for a duration of 63.5 months (IQR: 37.7–67.1 months). The baseline ABI showed a non-normal distribution (). During the follow-up period, 31.0% (164/529) of the patients developed ESKD, including 42.5% (74/174) in the low ABI group, 24.8% (76/306) in the normal ABI group, and 28.5% (14/49) in the high ABI group.

Figure 1. Distribution of ankle brachial index (ABI) levels.

Figure 1. Distribution of ankle brachial index (ABI) levels.

Comparisons of clinical parameters between the groups

The baseline characteristics of the total study population and after stratification by the upper and lower limits of the normal range of ABI are presented in . Patients with a lower ABI were more likely to be female, older, and smokers, and had a higher SBP, serum CRP level, and serum total cholesterol (TC) level (all p < 0.05) ().

Table 1. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease categorized according to the ankle brachial index (ABI).

Association between the ABI and ESKD in advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease

A total of 164 patients developed ESKD events that were recorded during follow-up. The results of survival analysis for ESKD showed that ABI level <0.9 had the worst prognosis. Patients in the low ABI group had a significantly higher rate of ESKD events than patients in the other groups (ABI <0.9 vs 0.9 ≤ ABI ≤1.3 vs ABI >1.3; 42.5% vs. 24.8% vs. 28.5%, respectively; p = 0.002, log-rank test; ).

Figure 2. Cumulative survival curves for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) according to the categorization of the ankle brachial index (ABI) levels at baseline.

Figure 2. Cumulative survival curves for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) according to the categorization of the ankle brachial index (ABI) levels at baseline.

In the univariate analyses, we found that female sex (HR: 1.360, 95% CI: 1.000, 1.850, p = 0.048), diabetes duration (HR: 1.050, 95% CI: 1.010, 1.080, p = 0.004), higher HbA1C levels (HR: 1.110, 95% CI: 1.010, 1.230, p = 0.037), higher serum CRP levels (HR: 1.040, 95% CI: 1.000, 1.090, p < 0.001), and lower ABI (HR: 0.988, 95% CI: 0.983, 0.994, p < 0.001) were associated with ESKD events (, and ). After adjustment for age, sex, smoking, alcohol consumption, duration of DM, use of statins, use of insulin, use of hypoglycemic drugs, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, HGB, HbA1C, eGFR, UACR, UA, ALB, triglycerides, TC, 24-h proteinuria, and CRP, the association of ABI and ESKD events did not change markedly(HR: 0.991, 95% CI: 0.985, 0.997, p = 0.004). Furthermore, after stratifying the ABI into three groups according to the upper and lower limits of its normal range and following adjustments for the above-mentioned confounding factors in the similar model, compared with the ABI normal range group, the ABI < 0.9 group remained a greater risk of ESKD events (HR: 1.758, 95% CI: 1.243, 2.487, p = 0.001; ).

Figure 3. Crude hazard ratios for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) by demographic variables. HR: hazard ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; ACEI: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; SBP: systolic blood pressure; ABI: ankle brachial index.

Figure 3. Crude hazard ratios for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) by demographic variables. HR: hazard ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; ACEI: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; SBP: systolic blood pressure; ABI: ankle brachial index.

Figure 4. Crude hazard ratios for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) by laboratory examination. HR: hazard ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; HbA1C: glycated hemoglobin; Glu: serum glucose; UACR: urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio; sCr: serum creatinine; BUN: serum urea nitrogen; eGFR: glomerular filtration rate; HGB: hemoglobin; WBC: white blood cell; PLT: platelet; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglycerides; ALB: serum albumin; UA: uric acid; CRP: C-reactive protein.

Figure 4. Crude hazard ratios for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) by laboratory examination. HR: hazard ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; HbA1C: glycated hemoglobin; Glu: serum glucose; UACR: urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio; sCr: serum creatinine; BUN: serum urea nitrogen; eGFR: glomerular filtration rate; HGB: hemoglobin; WBC: white blood cell; PLT: platelet; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglycerides; ALB: serum albumin; UA: uric acid; CRP: C-reactive protein.

Table 2. Result of the univariate Cox proportional hazard model for associations of baseline clinical and laboratory parameters with ESRD in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease.

Table 3. Associations between continuous and stratified ABI and ESKD.

Discussion

This study identified an association between a lower baseline ABI and ESKD in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease and found that individuals with ABI < 0.9 had a significantly higher rate of ESKD events, accounting for 42.5%. Patients with an ABI < 0.9 had an increased risk of ESKD compared to that in those with a normal ABI, indicating that patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease with a lower baseline ABI, which is associated with arterial disease in the lower extremities, are at higher risk of developing ESKD. This is the first study to evaluate the precise role of a low ABI in the progression to ESKD in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease.

Diabetic nephropathy is a common microvascular complication of DM and is associated with macrovascular disease [Citation20]. As kidney microvascular disease progresses, macrovascular sclerosis also progresses [Citation21]. The correlation between the ABI and microvascular complications in patients with DM has been widely studied [Citation6]. Previous studies have suggested that the ABI can be used to evaluate pathological changes in patients with diabetic nephropathy [Citation9]. Patients with CKD are especially prone to complications of atherosclerosis, PAD, calcification of arterial walls, and increased arterial stiffness [Citation22]. The ABI is used to detect PAD and is a marker of generalized atherosclerosis. The association between a low ABI and cardiovascular disease events has been well established [Citation23], and several studies have reported an association between a low ABI and deteriorated kidney function [Citation14,Citation15,Citation24]. The results of these previous studies indicate that a low ABI predicts future kidney function decline in the general population [Citation14] and in patients with DM [Citation9]. An ABI < 0.9 is associated with a greater risk of early-stage CKD after adjusting for traditional CKD risk factors in patients with DM, independent of albuminuria [Citation15]. The results of the current study are consistent with previously reported results and indicate that a lower baseline ABI is independently associated with ESKD in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease, suggesting a close relationship between PAD and ESKD. However, the mechanisms of these relationships are complicated. One mechanism may be the kidney manifestation of systemic arteriosclerosis. Atherosclerosis can promote abnormal kidney function [Citation25]. A recent paper from Subramanian at al. found that absent or diminished pedal pulses reflecting atherosclerosis correlated with eGFR decline in diabetics [Citation26]. Those finding integrate with and support our results. In our study, patients with a low ABI had a higher SBP than those with a normal or high ABI. Arteriosclerosis may result in the transmission of an increased SBP to the glomerular capillaries, exacerbating glomerular hypertension, which is the main determinant of progressive kidney injury [Citation27,Citation28].

CRP, an inflammatory marker, may be independently associated with an abnormal ABI [Citation23,Citation29]. Consistent with that in previous studies, patients in the lower ABI group had a higher serum CRP level than patients in the normal ABI group in this study. These results indicate that inflammation may be a potential underlying mechanism of a low ABI. Inflammation may exacerbate kidney function, leading to ESKD in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease and is associated with microvascular and macrovascular complications in patients with DM [Citation11,Citation30]. Prolonged inflammation may result in aberrant adenosinergic signaling, which sustains inflammasome activation and worsens fibrotic reactions in target tissues within the kidney [Citation31]. Inflammation and atherosclerosis interact and promote one another in patients with CKD [Citation32], forming a cycle [Citation33] that leads to the deterioration of kidney function.

An important methodological advantage of the current study is the analyses being conducted after the adjustment for renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, which have been shown to reduce proteinuria and protect kidney function [Citation34]. However, this study is not without limitations. Firstly, markers of oxidative stress and other inflammatory markers, such as superoxide dismutase, malonaldehyde, interleukin 6, and tumor necrosis factor α, were not measured at baseline. Secondly, data regarding the use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist medications were not available, which may be related to the prognosis of kidney function and we did not record the events of myocardial infarction and stroke, or other cardiovascular diseases that are associated with arteriosclerosis. Thirdly, the study population had been in a poorer glycemic control and the HbA1c level during the follow-up period was not available, which may also interfere the outcomes. Lastly, this single-center, retrospective study was conducted using data from a database. Therefore, bias cannot be ruled out.

In conclusion, lower-extremity arterial disease, defined as a baseline ABI < 0.9, may be associated with ESKD in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease. Potential mechanisms of this association include atherosclerosis, inflammation, and subsequent deterioration of kidney function. Improving atherosclerosis and the inflammatory status in patients with advanced-stage diabetic kidney disease may provide clinical benefits in the long-term kidney survival of patients with residual kidney function. However, prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed.

Author contributions

Ruiying Tang contributed to the study design and drafting of the manuscript. Yun Liu was involved in the revision of the manuscript and the analysis and interpretation of the data. Jiexin Chen and Jihong Deng were involved in the data collection and data verification. Yan Liu was involved in the revision of the manuscript. Qingdong Xu contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content and the final approval of the submitted manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to the nephrologists and nurses at our center for their excellent management of patients with diabetic kidney disease. The authors also thank the staff who were directly involved in this retrospective, cohort study.

Disclosure statement

The authors report that there are no competing interests to declare.

Data availability statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Guangzhou Municipal Health Commission under Grant 20221A011018.

References

  • Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, et al. IDF diabetes atlas: global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;138:271–281.
  • Molitch ME, DeFronzo RA, Franz MJ, et al. Nephropathy in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(Suppl 1): s79–83.
  • Afkarian M, Sachs MC, Kestenbaum B, et al. Kidney disease and increased mortality risk in type 2 diabetes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(2):302–308.
  • American Diabetes A. Standards of medical care in diabetes–2014. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:S14–S80. Suppl 1:
  • American Diabetes A. Peripheral arterial disease in people with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(12):3333–3341.
  • Cardoso CRL, Melo JV, Salles GC, et al. Prognostic impact of the ankle-brachial index on the development of micro- and macrovascular complications in individuals with type 2 diabetes: the Rio De Janeiro type 2 diabetes cohort study. Diabetologia. 2018;61(11):2266–2276.
  • Moyer VA, Force U, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for peripheral artery disease and cardiovascular disease risk assessment with the ankle-brachial index in adults: u.S. Preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(5):342–348.
  • Guirguis-Blake JM, Evans CV, Redmond N, et al. Screening for peripheral artery disease using the Ankle-Brachial index: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA. 2018;320(2):184–196.
  • Jin X, Ma JH, Shen Y, et al. An analysis of the relationship between ankle-brachial index and estimated glomerular filtration rate in type 2 diabetes. Angiology. 2013;64(3):237–241.
  • Dorans KS, He H, Chen J, CRIC Study Investigators, et al. Change in ankle-brachial index and mortality among individuals with chronic kidney disease: findings from the chronic renal insufficiency cohort study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021;36(12):2224–2231.
  • Chang LH, Chu CH, Lin HD, et al. The ankle brachial index is associated with prognosis in patients with diabetic kidney disease. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015;108(2):316–322.
  • Naito H, Hosomi N, Kuzume D, et al. Increased blood pressure variability during the subacute phase in patients with ischemic stroke presenting with a low ankle-brachial index. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020;20(5):448–454.
  • Kamath TP, Prasad R, Allison MA, et al. Association of Ankle-Brachial and Toe-Brachial indexes with mortality in patients with CKD. Kidney Med. 2020;2(1):68–75.
  • Sonoda H, Nakamura K, Tamakoshi A. Ankle-Brachial index is a predictor of future incident chronic kidney disease in a general japanese population. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2019;26(12):1054–1061.
  • Dong X, Wu D, Jia C, et al. Low ankle-brachial index is associated with early-stage chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetic patients independent of albuminuria. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e109641.
  • Sheen YJ, Lin JL, Lee IT, et al. Low estimated glomerular filtration rate is a major determinant of low ankle-brachial index and toe-brachial index in type 2 diabetes. Angiology. 2012;63(1):55–61.
  • Criqui MH, McClelland RL, McDermott MM, et al. The ankle-brachial index and incident cardiovascular events in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic study of atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(18):1506–1512.
  • Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, et al. AHA/ACC guideline on the management of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2016;135(12):e726–e779. 2017
  • Schwandt A, Denkinger M, Fasching P, et al. Comparison of MDRD, CKD-EPI, and Cockcroft-Gault equation in relation to measured glomerular filtration rate among a large cohort with diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2017;31(9):1376–1383.
  • Navaneethan SD, Zoungas S, Caramori ML, et al. Diabetes management in chronic kidney disease: synopsis of the 2020 KDIGO clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174(3):385–394.
  • Rigalleau V, Cougnard-Gregoire A, Nov S, et al. Association of advanced glycation end products and chronic kidney disease with macroangiopathy in type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2015;29(2):270–274.
  • Piko N, Bevc S, Ekart R, et al. Diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease: non-invasive assessment of cardiovascular risk. World J Diabetes. 2021;12(7):975–996.
  • Ishii H, Takahashi H, Ito Y, et al. The association of ankle brachial index, Protein-Energy wasting, and inflammation status with cardiovascular mortality in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Nutrients. 2017;9(4):416.
  • Ix JH, Katz R, De Boer IH, et al. Association of chronic kidney disease with the spectrum of ankle brachial index the CHS (cardiovascular health study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(13):1176–1184.
  • Chen SC, Chang JM, Liu WC, et al. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and rate of renal function decline and mortality in chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6(4):724–732.
  • Subramanian N, Xu J, Sayyed Kassem L, et al. Absent or diminished pedal pulses and estimated GFR decline in patients with diabetic kidney disease. Ren Fail. 2019;41(1):691–697.
  • Griffin KA, Picken MM, Churchill M, et al. Functional and structural correlates of glomerulosclerosis after renal mass reduction in the rat. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11(3):497–506.
  • Bidani AK, Griffin KA, Picken M, et al. Continuous telemetric blood pressure monitoring and glomerular injury in the rat remnant kidney model. Am J Physiol. 1993;265(3 Pt 2):F391–398.
  • Arroyo D, Betriu A, Valls J, Investigators from the NEFRONA study, et al. Factors influencing pathological ankle-brachial index values along the chronic kidney disease spectrum: the NEFRONA study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017;32(3):513–520.
  • Brennan E, Kantharidis P, Cooper ME, et al. Pro-resolving lipid mediators: regulators of inflammation, metabolism and kidney function. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021;17(11):725–739.
  • Dwyer KM, Kishore BK, Robson SC. Conversion of extracellular ATP into adenosine: a master switch in renal health and disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16(9):509–524.
  • Stenvinkel P, Heimburger O, Paultre F, et al. Strong association between malnutrition, inflammation, and atherosclerosis in chronic renal failure. Kidney Int. 1999;55(5):1899–1911.
  • Sueta D, Hokimoto S, Sakamoto K, Multi-center Study of Hemodialysis Patients Undergoing Invasive Cardiovascular Procedures Study Investigators, et al. Validation of the high mortality rate of Malnutrition-Inflammation-Atherosclerosis syndrome: -Community-based observational study. Int J Cardiol. 2017;230:97–102.
  • Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, Collaborative Study Group, et al. Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(12):851–860.