5,904
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Medication treatment for opioid use disorder and community pharmacy: Expanding care during a national epidemic and global pandemic

, PhD, , MD, , PharmD & , MD, MPHORCID Icon

Abstract

Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), such as methadone and buprenorphine, are effective strategies for treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) and reducing overdose risk. MOUD treatment rates continue to be low across the US, and currently, some evidence suggests access to evidence-based treatment is becoming increasingly difficult for those with OUD as a result of the 2019 novel corona virus (COVID-19). A major underutilized source to address these serious challenges in the US is community pharmacy given the specialized training of pharmacists, high levels of consumer trust, and general availability for accessing these service settings. Canadian, Australian, and European pharmacists have made important contributions to the treatment and care of those with OUD over the past decades. Unfortunately, US pharmacists are not permitted to prescribe MOUD and are only currently allowed to dispense methadone for the treatment of pain, not OUD. US policymakers, regulators, and practitioners must work to facilitate this advancement of community pharmacy-based through research, education, practice, and industry. Advancing community pharmacy-based MOUD for leading clinical management of OUD and dispensation of treatment medications will afford the US a critical innovation for addressing the opioid epidemic, fallout from COVID-19, and getting individuals the care they need.

The US has experienced a devastating opioid epidemic over the last decades—which continues to have tremendous negative impacts on public health across the nation.Citation1 While a reduction in opioid prescribing nationally is among the limited improvements observed in recent years,Citation2–4 rates of opioid use disorder (OUD) continue nevertheless to surge substantially, realizing 300–400% increases among some populations.Citation5–8 Clinic- and population-level data demonstrate medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD); such as methadone and buprenorphine; are effective strategies for treatment and reducing overdose risk.Citation9–11 MOUD—able to be prescribed or dispensed in a variety of clinical settings—is the gold standard treatment for OUD and has shown to reduce healthcare costs and prevent high-risk behaviors.Citation12–18 In addition, MOUD improves patients’ quality of life.Citation19–22

In the US, however, MOUD treatment rates among those with OUD continue to be low.Citation1,Citation23 High overdose rates persist in communities with limited treatment capabilities.Citation24 Rates of OUD largely exceed rates of treatment capacity nationwide, with some areas altogether lacking OUD treatment providers.Citation24–26

Clinicians and addiction investigators across the US are calling attention to the worsening realities of access to MOUD treatment stemming from the 2019 novel corona virus (COVID-19) coinciding with the significant vulnerabilities of patients with addiction.Citation27–29 With hospitalization and mortality rates increasing internationally, individuals with opioid and/or other substance use disorders have been recognized to have increased risk for infection.Citation29–32 There exists some evidence that use of addictive substances, including alcohol and opioids, increases during times of national crisis.Citation33–37 US federal agencies have worked to adjust rules to better facilitate OUD treatment; however, existing treatment shortages combined with social distancing and shelter-in-place orders aimed at flattening the COVID-19 curve have increased barriers to OUD evidence-based care.Citation29–32 A real concern during the COVID-19 pandemic—similar to concerns during natural disasters—is the potential for decreased access to and retention in addiction care.Citation27,Citation38,Citation39 Historically, such population-level crises have been particularly deleterious to patients with addiction, with access to care further impaired in spite of relaxed regulations and rules within the US addiction treatment system.Citation27,Citation40–44

Pharmacy to address treatment shortage

A major setting to address these serious challenges in the US surrounding access to opioid treatment is community pharmacy. Community pharmacies have substantial potential as a ubiquitous service location—with >90% of Americans living within 2 miles of a retail pharmacy.Citation45 Pharmacists have extensive training in management, safety assessment, and effective use of medications.Citation46 These professionals enjoy some of the highest rankings for consumer trust,Citation47 and notably, prior research has demonstrated patients are willing to receive behavioral health information from pharmacists.Citation48,Citation49 Research has shown pharmacists can play an important role in delivering evidence-based services to care for opioid related risk.Citation50,Citation51 It is unfortunate that US pharmacists are not permitted to prescribe MOUD and are only currently allowed to dispense methadone for the treatment of pain, not OUD.

Pharmacists in Canada, Australia, and across Europe (particularly the United Kingdom [UK]) have been closely involved in delivery of treatment for OUD, particularly methadone maintenance services, for a number of decades.Citation52–54 In the present day, licensed pharmacists in Australia, Canada, and UK pharmacies are able to fill and dispense methadone prescriptions to verified patients, with procedures in place to ensure diversion does not occur.Citation55,Citation56 An accreditation is optional in AustraliaCitation53,Citation57 and not required in Canada and the UK.Citation58,Citation59 Funding for pharmacy-based MOUD programs in Canada and the UK are paid for by governmental sourcesCitation55 (although Canada’s system does not universally cover medication costs) and Australia’s system is a public private payer mix.Citation53 Costs for operating pharmacy based programs in Canada, Australia, and the UK are similar to US methadone programs.Citation60

Pharmacy delivery of methadone maintenance therapy has contributed to important outcomes for those receiving OUD treatment. One noteworthy example is population penetration among those with OUD. Compared to the US, rates of those who receive methadone treatment for OUD are 3–4 times higher in CanadaCitation61 and 1.6 times higher in Australia.Citation62,Citation63 Moreover, while rural methadone programs in the US are nearly non-existent, and very few rural providers have buprenorphine waivers,Citation64,Citation65 rural areas of Canada have approximately similar methadone enrollment and retention rates as urban populations.Citation66 Remarkably, in the current wake of COVID-19, while the US has scrambled to develop solutions to facilitate treatment for those with OUDCitation28,Citation67,Citation68—Canadian, Australian, and UK pharmacies have only needed to make modest shifts to keep vital treatment medications available to patients.Citation69–71 Notably, as a result of the pandemic, the roles and scope of practice of Canadian pharmacists have expanded. Under Section 56 (1) of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, Health Canada has issued temporary exemptions for prescriptions of controlled substances.Citation72 This expansion permits pharmacists to extend prescriptions, transfer prescriptions to other pharmacists, allows prescribers to issue verbal orders, and permits pharmacy employees to deliver prescriptions of controlled substances. Prescribers, pharmacists, and other healthcare providers are encouraged to work closely together to identify the best possible solution and outcome for patients.Citation72

To date, buprenorphine products (including buprenorphine/naloxone) are the only opioid agonist treatments available to be dispensed—with a prescription from a valid, credentialed prescriber—in US community pharmacies. Buprenorphine products possess a number of benefits, which include (1) insurance coverage by Medicare, most Medicaid programs, and many commercial payers; (2) accessibility for patients who are not geographically located near a licensed opioid treatment program (a “methadone facility”), and (3) availability as a treatment option to those who do not seek or wish to engage in methadone care due to ideological and stigma concerns.Citation73,Citation74 Yet, buprenorphine treatment is highly regulated in that it can only be prescribed by waivered practitioners, and pharmacists’ attitudes/beliefs toward MOUD treatment may impede current and future implementation of pharmacist-led care models.Citation75–82

Advancing the field

Owing to the benefits of broader access of medications for opioid treatment, such as methadone and buprenorphine—we echo the call of others across the US of the paramount importance for US policy makers, regulators, and practitioners to work to enable licensed pharmacists to be an integral part of the strategy to screen, prevent, and manage MOUD.Citation27,Citation55,Citation60 Potential results of such actions would (1) continue the advancement for a solution to the US opioid epidemic; (2) provide a critically needed response to the rapidly evolving challenges faced by COVID-19; and (3) stage a foundation for future national readiness within the substance use prevention and treatment system. We set forth four pillars that support such a system transformation:

Research

Recently completed, current, and future research projects demonstrate and will continue to expand the capacity of US pharmacists to engage patients with opioid related risk and use disorders. For instance, our research team at the University of Utah recently led a study in which pharmacists screened and provided a brief medication adherence intervention in collaboration with a telephone-based patient navigator to address prescription opioid misuse among community pharmacy patients.Citation50 Results of this study showed intervention feasibility, acceptability and significant improvements for patients compared to controls for opioid medication misuse, depression, and pain.Citation50 A second phase of this line of research will implement the intervention in a powered trial within a small system of community pharmacies. This program of research has begun to demonstrate pharmacists can successfully lead in the management of patients with opioid-related risk behaviors.

The National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network has also been a frontrunner in bringing pharmacy into the OUD continuum of care. For example, our Clinical Trials Network team is leading the Validation of a Community Pharmacy-based Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Risk Screening Tool (CTN-0093) study, which study is working in community pharmacies to validate a national prescription drug monitoring program-based metric that will enable pharmacists to triage and understand care needed by patients with prescription opioid-related risk, including OUD. Subsequent to this study, a clinical decision support tool will be developed and tested incorporating the validated metric that will empower pharmacists within their practice workflow to better provide care to patients with opioid related-risk health concerns. In addition to this study, Duke University Network members are leading the Integrating Pharmacy-Based Prevention And Treatment Of Opioid And Other Substance Use Disorders: A Survey Of Pharmacists And Stakeholder (CTN-0095) study. This survey is working to understand the current status, knowledge, and attitudes of pharmacists in the US toward identification, brief intervention, referral, and MOUD provision. Together, these studies demonstrate the increasing knowledge and resource base for pharmacists managing/treating patients with OUD.

Federal and state regulations limiting MOUD prescribing and dispensing, however, currently impede the capacity to test models of care in community pharmacies. One important avenue to facilitate such evaluation could be seeking exemptions for Investigational New Drug rules from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).Citation83 Guidance from the FDA allows for a medication to be used for research purposes if it is lawfully marketed in the US, not intended to change labeling or advertising of the medication, does not significantly increase risk with use of the product, is conducted in compliance with human subjects projections requirements, and is not intended for product commercialization.Citation83 Leveraging this mechanism may allow for US-based development and testing of MOUD management within community pharmacies.

Practice

A key framework for testing and implementing novel models for MOUD dispensation and management in community pharmacy is collaborative practice agreements (CPA).Citation84 Examples of well-known CPAs include influenza vaccinations,Citation85 diabetes care,Citation84 and naloxone rescue.Citation86 CPAs set forth criteria and procedures within which pharmacists can operate under a provider’s prescribing authority to perform specified functions. For methadone or buprenorphine within community pharmacy settings, a CPA could include intake assessments and medication initiation, dispensation, monitoring, refills, and discontinuation. It is important to note that CPAs do not come without challenges, including resistance from some prescribers,Citation87 that necessarily should be addressed as these important agreements are implemented into practice.

Education

Complementary to advancements for CPAs is development and implementation of training and education for pharmacists within the field and those soon to be practicing. While some efforts have taken place in the past for creating curricula and training materials for pharmacists to effectively practice with those who use substances,Citation88–90 pharmacy education in the US continues to have a limited focus on this area. Similar to the manner in which many states mandate continuing education credits in pharmacy law as a specific topic area,Citation91 it will likewise be important that credit requirements include addiction treatment topics, such as MOUD management. Furthermore, it is critical that pharmacy degree granting programs across the US increasingly incorporate initiatives to focus on both behavioral and medicinal approaches to substance use prevention, intervention, and treatment.

Industry

Innovations in community pharmacy research, practice, and education create a professional environment that is also rapidly changing. Indeed, community pharmacy is quickly evolving from its roots in retail practice into crucial roles within interdisciplinary treatment teams, leaders for wellness management, and acute/chronic care providers.Citation92–94 It is thus key that as pharmacists continue to be recognized in much broader roles in the US—industry leaders and large-scale employers also recognize the critical addition of addiction health care services in community pharmacy. Such a transformation in industry can only be led by sustainable payment models to support pharmacists engaging in addiction care. Inroads currently underway that support such system-level transformation are based in state laws slowly being passed that distinguish and compensate pharmacists as health care providers.Citation95 Including MOUD management as a reimbursable service for pharmacists would facilitate successful long-term practice integration.

Conclusion

The opioid epidemic combined with the current COVID-19 pandemic have had a devastating impact across the globe. This impact has catapulted the need to increase the role of pharmacist as an important health care provider and integral part of the multidisciplinary team caring for those with OUD. Advancing community pharmacy-based MOUD services in terms of leading clinical management and dispensation of medication will afford the US a critical innovation for addressing the opioid epidemic, fallout from COVID-19, and getting individuals with OUD the care they need. Following the above outlined pillars of research, education, practice, and industry stands to facilitate this needed expansion of services for patients with OUD.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse [5UG1DA04944402].

References

  • SAMHSA. Key Substance Use and Mental Health Indicators in the United States: results from the 2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality; 2019.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. U.S. opioid prescribing rate maps. https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/maps/rxrate-maps.html. Published 2018. Accessed November 24, 2018.
  • Bao Y, Pan Y, Taylor A, et al. Prescription drug monitoring programs are associated with sustained reductions in opioid prescribing by physicians. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35(6):1045–1051.
  • Wen H, Schackman BR, Aden B, Bao Y. States with prescription drug monitoring mandates saw a reduction in opioids prescribed to Medicaid enrollees. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017;36(4):733–741.
  • Leslie DL, Ba DM, Agbese E, Xing X, Liu G. The economic burden of the opioid epidemic on states: the case of Medicaid. Am J Manag Care. 2019;25(13 Suppl):S243–S249.
  • Saloner B, Landis R, Stein BD, Barry CL. The Affordable Care Act in the heart of the opioid crisis: evidence from West Virginia. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019;38(4):633–642.
  • Peterson C, Xu L, Mikosz CA, Florence C, Mack KA. US hospital discharges documenting patient opioid use disorder without opioid overdose or treatment services, 2011–2015. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018;92:35–39.
  • Peterson C, Xu L, Florence C, Mack KA. Opioid-related US hospital discharges by type, 1993–2016. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019;103:9–13.
  • Cochran G, Gordon AJ, Lo-Ciganic WH, et al. An examination of claims-based predictors of overdose from a large medicaid program. Med Care. 2016; 55(3):291–298.
  • Kelty E, Hulse G. Fatal and non-fatal opioid overdose in opioid dependent patients treated with methadone, buprenorphine or implant naltrexone. Int J Drug Policy. 2017;46:54–60.
  • Sordo L, Barrio G, Bravo MJ, et al. Mortality risk during and after opioid substitution treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ. 2017;357:j1550.
  • Mattick RP, Breen C, Kimber J, Davoli M. Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(2):CD002207.
  • Volkow ND, Frieden TR, Hyde PS, Cha SS. Medication-assisted therapies-tackling the opioid-overdose epidemic. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(22):2063–2066.
  • Volkow ND, Collins FS. The role of science in addressing the opioid crisis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(4):391–394.
  • Thomas CP, Fullerton CA, Kim M, et al. Medication-assisted treatment with buprenorphine: assessing the evidence. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65(2):158–170.
  • Clausen T, Anchersen K, Waal H. Mortality prior to, during and after opioid maintenance treatment (OMT): a national prospective cross-registry study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;94(1–3):151–157.
  • Tkacz J, Volpicelli J, Un H, Ruetsch C. Relationship between buprenorphine adherence and health service utilization and costs among opioid dependent patients. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014;46(4):456–462.
  • Gowing L, Farrell MF, Bornemann R, Sullivan LE, Ali R. Oral substitution treatment of injecting opioid users for prevention of HIV infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(8):CD004145.
  • Giacomuzzi SM, Ertl M, Kemmler G, Riemer Y, Vigl A. Sublingual buprenorphine and methadone maintenance treatment: a three-year follow-up of quality of life assessment. ScientificWorldJournal. 2005;5:452–468.
  • Giacomuzzi SM, Riemer Y, Ertl M, et al. Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance treatment in an ambulant setting: a health-related quality of life assessment. Addiction. 2003;98(5):693–702.
  • Ponizovsky AM, Grinshpoon A. Quality of life among heroin users on buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2007;33(5):631–642.
  • Ponizovsky AM, Margolis A, Heled L, Rosca P, Radomislensky I, Grinshpoon A. Improved quality of life, clinical, and psychosocial outcomes among heroin-dependent patients on ambulatory buprenorphine maintenance. Subst Use Misuse. 2010;45(1–2):288–313.
  • Wu L-T, Zhu H, Swartz MS. Treatment utilization among persons with opioid use disorder in the United States. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;169:117–127.
  • Haffajee RL, Lin LA, Bohnert ASB, Goldstick JE. Characteristics of US counties with high opioid overdose mortality and low capacity to deliver medications for opioid use disorder. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(6):e196373.
  • Jones CM, McCance-Katz EF. Characteristics and prescribing practices of clinicians recently waivered to prescribe buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder. Addiction. 2019;114(3):471–482.
  • Jones CM, Campopiano M, Baldwin G, McCance-Katz E. National and state treatment need and capacity for opioid agonist medication-assisted treatment. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(8):e55–e63.
  • Green TC, Bratberg J, Finnell DS. Opioid use disorder and the COVID 19 pandemic: A call to sustain regulatory easements and further expand access to treatment. Subst Abus. 2020;41(2):147–149.
  • Priest K. The COVID-19 Pandemic: practice and policy considerations for patients with opioid use disorder. Health Affairs Blog. 2020.
  • Volkow ND. Collision of the COVID-19 and addiction epidemics. Ann Intern Med. 2020. doi:10.7326/M20-1212.
  • Becker WC, Fiellin DA. When epidemics collide: coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the opioid crisis. Ann Intern Med. 2020. doi:10.7326/M20-1210.
  • NIDA. COVID-19: Potential implications for individuals with substance use disorders. https://www.drugabuse.gov/about-nida/noras-blog/2020/04/covid-19-potential-implications-individuals-substance-use-disorders. Published 2020. Accessed April 6.
  • Alexander GC, Stoller KB, Haffajee RL, Saloner B. An epidemic in the midst of a pandemic: opioid use disorder and COVID-19. Ann Intern Med. 2020. doi:10.7326/M20-1141.
  • Cerda M, Vlahov D, Tracy M, Galea S. Alcohol use trajectories among adults in an urban area after a disaster: evidence from a population-based cohort study. Addiction. 2008;103(8):1296–1307.
  • Kotarba JA, Fackler J, Johnson BD, Dunlap E. The melding of drug markets in Houston after Katrina: dealer and user perspectives. Subst Use Misuse. 2010;45(9):1390–1405.
  • Shuler M, Suzuki S, Podesta A, Qualls-Hampton R, Wallington SF. A post-hurricane katrina examination of substance abuse treatment discharges with co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders. J Dual Diagn. 2017;13(2):144–156.
  • Shuler MN, Wallington SF, Qualls-Hampton RY, Podesta AE, Suzuki S. Trend analysis of substance abuse treatment admissions in new orleans from 2000–2012: a population-based comparison pre- and post-hurricane Katrina. Subst Use Misuse. 2016;51(12):1542–1554.
  • Phillippi SW, Beiter K, Thomas CL, et al. Medicaid utilization before and after a natural disaster in the 2016 Baton Rouge-area flood. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(S4):S316–S321.
  • Dunlop A, Lokuge B, Masters D, et al. Challenges in maintaining treatment services for people who use drugs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Harm Reduct J. 2020;17(1):26.
  • Wilson CG, Ramage M, Fagan EB. A primary care response to COVID-19 for patients with an opioid use disorder. J Rural Health. 2020. doi:10.1111/jrh.12438.
  • Matusow H, Benoit E, Elliott L, Dunlap E, Rosenblum A. Challenges to opioid treatment programs after hurricane sandy: patient and provider perspectives on preparation, impact, and recovery. Subst Use Misuse. 2018;53(2):206–219.
  • Tofighi B, Grossman E, Goldfeld KS, Williams AR, Rotrosen J, Lee JD. Psychiatric comorbidity and substance use outcomes in an office-based buprenorphine program six months following hurricane Sandy. Subst Use Misuse. 2015;50(12):1571–1578.
  • McClure B, Mendoza S, Duncan L, Rotrosen J, Hansen H. Effects of regulation on methadone and buprenorphine provision in the wake of Hurricane Sandy. J Urban Health. 2014;91(5):999–1008.
  • Williams AR, Tofighi B, Rotrosen J, Lee JD, Grossman E. Psychiatric comorbidity, red flag behaviors, and associated outcomes among office-based buprenorphine patients following Hurricane Sandy. J Urban Health. 2014;91(2):366–375.
  • Tofighi B, Grossman E, Williams AR, Biary R, Rotrosen J, Lee JD. Outcomes among buprenorphine-naloxone primary care patients after Hurricane Sandy. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2014;9:3
  • Qato DM, Zenk S, Wilder J, Harrington R, Gaskin D, Alexander GC. The availability of pharmacies in the United States: 2007–2015. PLOS One. 2017;12(8):e0183172.
  • American Pharmacists Association. n.d. Pharmacists’ Impact on Patient Safety. Washington DC: American Pharmacists Association.
  • Riffkin R. Americans rate nurses highest on honesty, ethical standards. Gallup. http://www.webcitation.org/6hZbvKPDQ. Published 2014. Accessed May 17, 2016.
  • Khan NS, Norman IJ, Dhital R, McCrone P, Milligan P, Whittlesea CM. Alcohol brief intervention in community pharmacies: a feasibility study of outcomes and customer experiences. Int J Clin Pharm. 2013;35(6):1178–1187.
  • Cochran G, Rubinstein J, Bacci JL, Ylioja T, Tarter R. Screening community pharmacy patients for risk of prescription opioid misuse. J Addict Med. 2015;9(5):411–416.
  • Cochran G, Chen Q, Field C, et al. A community pharmacy-led intervention for opioid medication misuse: a small-scale randomized clinical trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019;205:107570.
  • Morton KJ, Harrand B, Floyd CC, et al. Pharmacy-based statewide naloxone distribution: a novel “top-down, bottom-up” approach. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017;57(2S):S99–S106.e105.
  • Fischer B. Prescriptions, power and politics: the turbulent history of methadone maintenance in Canada. J Public Health Policy. 2000;21(2):187–210.
  • Chaar BB, Hanrahan JR, Day C. Provision of opioid substitution therapy services in Australian pharmacies. Australas Med J. 2011;4(4):210–216.
  • Samet JH, Botticelli M. It’s time for methadone to be prescribed as part of primary care. https://www.statnews.com/2018/07/05/methadone-prescribed-primary-care/. Published 2018. Accessed April 30, 2020.
  • Calcaterra SL, Bach P, Chadi A, et al. Methadone Matters: what the United States can learn from the global effort to treat opioid addiction. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(6):1039–1042.
  • Methadone Maintenance Treatment Program Standards and Clinical Guidelines [press release]. Toronto: College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario; 2011.
  • Berbatis CG, Sunderland VB, Joyce A, Bulsara M, Mills C. Enhanced pharmacy services, barriers and facilitators in Australia’s community pharmacies: Australia’s National Pharmacy Database Project. Int J Pharm Pract. 2007;15(3):185–191.
  • NHS. Supervised Self Administration of Methadone and Buprenorphine Guidelines for Pharmacists and Pharmacy Technicians. Cumbria: National Health Service; 2010.
  • Strang J, Sheridan J, Hunt C, Kerr B, Gerada C, Pringle M. The prescribing of methadone and other opioids to addicts: national survey of GPs in England and Wales. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55(515):444–451.
  • Bach P, Hartung D. Leveraging the role of community pharmacists in the prevention, surveillance, and treatment of opioid use disorders. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2019;14(1):30–30.
  • Fischer B, Kurdyak P, Goldner E, Tyndall M, Rehm J. Treatment of prescription opioid disorders in Canada: looking at the ‘other epidemic’? Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2016;11(1):12.
  • Degenhardt L, Charlson F, Ferrari A, et al. The global burden of disease attributable to alcohol and drug use in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(12):987–1012.
  • Austrailian Institute of Health and Welfare. National Opioid Pharmacotherapy Statistics Annual Data Collection 2019. Sydney, Australia: Austrailian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2020.
  • Havens JR, Walsh SL, Korthuis PT, Fiellin DA. Implementing treatment of opioid-use disorder in rural settings: a focus on HIV and hepatitis c prevention and treatment. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2018;15(4):315–323.
  • Rosenblatt RA, Andrilla CH, Catlin M, Larson EH. Geographic and specialty distribution of US physicians trained to treat opioid use disorder. Ann Fam Med. 2015;13(1):23–26.
  • Eibl JK, Gomes T, Martins D, et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of first-time methadone maintenance therapy across northern, rural, and urban regions of Ontario, Canada. J Addict Med. 2015;9(6):440–446.
  • Insinger A. Methadone clinic lines and packed waiting rooms leave clients vulnerable to the coronavirus. In: STAT News; 2020. Boston.
  • Levander X, Wakeman S. Covid-19 will worsen the opioid overdose crisis if we don’t prepare now. In: STAT News; 2020. Boston.
  • Grierson J. Methadone to be supplied without new prescription during Covid-19 crisis. The Guardian. April 8, 2020.
  • Clun R. Opioid addiction treatment must change during pandemic, experts say. The Sydney Morning Herald. April 24, 2020.
  • Tait C, Gee M, Woo A. Pandemic restrictions reshape opioid treatment as doctors sound alarm. The Globe and Mail: Alberta. 2020.
  • Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA), Subsection 56(1); Class exemption for patients, practitioners and pharmacists prescribing and providing controlled substances in Canada during the coronavirus pandemic, §5; Subsection 56(1) 2020.
  • Wyse JJ, Gordon AJ, Dobscha SK, et al. Medications for opioid use disorder in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system: historical perspective, lessons learned, and next steps. Subst Abus. 2018;39(2):139–144.
  • Oliva EM, Maisel NC, Gordon AJ, Harris AH. Barriers to use of pharmacotherapy for addiction disorders and how to overcome them. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2011;13(5):374–381.
  • Lagisetty P, Smith A, Antoku D, et al. A physician-pharmacist collaborative care model to prevent opioid misuse. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020;77(10):771–780.
  • Muzyk A, Smothers ZPW, Collins K, MacEachern M, Wu LT. Pharmacists’ attitudes toward dispensing naloxone and medications for opioid use disorder: a scoping review of the literature. Subst Abus. 2019;40(4):476–483. doi:10.1080/08897077.2019.1616349.
  • Ventricelli DJ, Mathis SM, Foster KN, Pack RP, Tudiver F, Hagemeier NE. Communication experiences of data-waivered physicians with community pharmacists: a qualitative study. Subst Use Misuse. 2020;55(3):349–357.
  • Yadav R, Taylor D, Taylor G, Scott J. Community pharmacists’ role in preventing opioid substitution therapy-related deaths: a qualitative investigation into current UK practice. Int J Clin Pharm. 2019;41(2):470–477.
  • Lagisetty P, Klasa K, Bush C, Heisler M, Chopra V, Bohnert A. Primary care models for treating opioid use disorders: what actually works? A systematic review. PLOS One. 2017;12(10):e0186315
  • Matheson C, Thiruvothiyur M, Robertson H, Bond C. Community pharmacy services for people with drug problems over two decades in Scotland: implications for future development. Int J Drug Policy. 2016;27:105–112.
  • Messaadi N, Pansu A, Cohen O, Cottencin O. Pharmacists’ role in the continued care of patients under opiate substitution treatment. Therapie. 2013;68(6):393–400.
  • Uosukainen H, Bell JS, Laitinen K, Tacke U, Ilomäki J, Turunen JHO. First insights into community pharmacy based buprenorphine-naloxone dispensing in Finland. Int J Drug Policy. 2013;24(5):492–497.
  • FDA. Guidance for Clinical Investigators, Sponsors, and Irbs Investigational New Drug Applications (Inds) — Determining Whether Human Research Studies Can Be Conducted Without an IND. Rockville, MD: Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration; 2015.
  • Jun JK. The role of pharmacy through collaborative practice in an ambulatory care clinic. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2019;13(3):275–281.
  • Bach AT, Goad JA. The role of community pharmacy-based vaccination in the USA: current practice and future directions. Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2015;4:67–77.
  • Green TC, Dauria EF, Bratberg J, Davis CS, Walley AY. Orienting patients to greater opioid safety: models of community pharmacy-based naloxone. Harm Reduct J. 2015;12:25–25.
  • CDC. Collaborative Practice Agreements and Pharmacists’ Patient Care Services: A Resource for Pharmacists. Atlanta, GA: US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2013.
  • Jungnickel PW, Desimone EM, Kissack JC, AACP Special Committee on Substance Abuse and Pharmacy Education, et al. Report of the AACP special committee on substance abuse and pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(10):S11.
  • Tommasello AC. Substance abuse and pharmacy practice: what the community pharmacist needs to know about drug abuse and dependence. Harm Reduct J. 2004;1(1):3–3.
  • Bratberg J. Pharmacy: Addressing substance use in the 21st century. Subst Abus. 2019;40(4):421–434.
  • Medscape. State CE Requirements for Pharmacists. https://www.medscape.org/public/pharmcestaterequirements. Published 2018. Accessed April 27, 2020.
  • Goode J-V, Owen J, Page A, Gatewood S. Community-based pharmacy practice innovation and the role of the community-based pharmacist practitioner in the United States. Pharmacy. 2019;7(3):106.
  • Babar ZU, Scahill S, Nagaria RA, Curley LE. The future of pharmacy practice research - Perspectives of academics and practitioners from Australia, NZ, United Kingdom, Canada and USA. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018;14(12):1163–1171.
  • Bacci JL, Berenbrok LA. Innovative advances in connectivity and community pharmacist patient care services: implications for patient safety. Pharmacotherapy. 2018;38(8):867–874.
  • Yap D. State provider status advances in 2017. Pharmacy Today. 2017;24:58.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.