Abstract
Peri- and postmenopausal women commonly suffer from climacteric symptoms. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of dietary supplement Amberen to relieve vasomotor and psychosomatic symptoms during the course of a 3-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. General clinical assessment, evaluation using the Greene climacteric test and Spielberger–Hanin test, determination of plasma levels of gonadotropins, estradiol, leptin and apolipoproteins were used to evaluate 42–60-year-old women with vasomotor and psychosomatic menopausal symptoms. One hundred and twenty-five women were enrolled in the study and randomized between two groups. Based on the Greene test results, there was a statistically significant improvement (р < 0.05) in 13 out of 21 menopausal symptoms in women who took Amberen. During the course and by the end of the study, patients showed statistically significant changes in the levels of estradiol, gonadotropins and leptin, and decreases in body weight and waist circumference. Spielberger–Hanin test showed that Amberen stabilizes patients’ psychological state with a statistically significant decrease in anxiety, increased stress resistance and improved adaptability. Comparative analysis of the vital signs measurements, blood tests and urinalysis did not show any negative effects of Amberen on the patients. Our findings indicate that Amberen can be considered a method of choice to relief mild/moderate climacteric symptoms.
Introduction
Age-related dysfunction of neurohormonal regulation due to an increase in the hypothalamic threshold of sensitivity to input signals and a decline and eventual cessation of ovarian estrogen synthesis often lead to the development of so-called climacteric symptoms in peri- and postmenopausal women [Citation1–3]. Some of these (vasomotor symptoms) can clearly be attributed to the reduced synthesis of sex steroids, while others (sleep disturbance, bodily symptoms, urinary tract symptoms, sexual problems and mood changes) may be of a multifactorial origin. Collectively, these symptoms describe the climacteric syndrome; however, this is not the only term for this set of symptoms. Moreover, the peri- and postmenopausal periods are marked by other age-related changes, including metabolic disturbance associated with obesity and the cardiometabolic risk [Citation4,Citation5].
Treatment of vasomotor and psychosomatic symptoms in peri- and postmenopause relies on replacement of the loss of estrogen secretion, neurotropic/vegetotropic and other effects, directed towards an improvement of psychological and physical health. A commonly used treatment is the peri- and postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) with sex steroids, the most effective treatment available today [Citation6–9]. However, because HT has some contraindications and certain risks, there has been a search for alternative treatments, particularly in recent years [Citation6–8,10–12]. Preparations of botanical origin (phytoestrogens in the form of isoflavones from red clover or soya and Cimicifuga racemosa) are especially popular [Citation12]. The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors venlafaxine and fluoxetine have been found effective against vasomotor symptoms; also there is evidence for the effectiveness of an anticonvulsant gabapentin in this context [Citation6,Citation11].
Understanding the role of hypothalamic aging in the development of the climacteric symptoms lead some researchers to the idea of using methods that can restore the organ’s sensitivity to input signals. This “rejuvenating” restoration of hypothalamic sensitivity was demonstrated with small doses of amber acid [Citation13]. As a result, dietary supplement Amberen was developed, the use of which showed high effectiveness in experiments with aged animals. Several clinical trials confirmed Amberen’s effectiveness in relieving menopausal symptoms in women [Citation14].
The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Amberen in relieving vasomotor and psychosomatic symptoms in peri- and postmenopausal women.
Materials and methods
Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki): “Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects” and the National Standard of the Russian Federation “Proper clinical practice”; the study was approved by the local Ethics Committee of the I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Protocol No. 07–15, 2015).
The study recruited women between 42 and 60 years of age, with vasomotor and psychosomatic complaints, in the late phase of the menopausal transition and postmenopause according to the STRAW + 10 classification [Citation15]. Patients were not included in the study if any of the following was discovered during screening: cancers (including in the medical history); conditions requiring hospitalization in the next 6 months; endocrine diseases with abnormal hormonal secretion; any surgeries within 1 year of the screening; HT within 6 months of the screening; psychiatric diseases; diabetes mellitus and taking other supplements that may affect the climacteric syndrome.
Based on the above inclusion and exclusion criteria, 125 patients were enrolled in the study. The randomization was done using random number generation, evenly distributed in the 0–999 interval; the initial number for randomization was created by a computer’s pulse generator.
For all patients, the following data was collected: demographic and health, general and gynecological medical history. Anthropometric measurements (height, body weight, waist circumference, body mass index (BMI) calculated using the Ketle index) and vital signs were taken; patients underwent general and gynecological exams. Additional evaluations included blood panels (general and biochemical), urinalysis, electrocardiogram (ECG), mammogram and transvaginal sonography of pelvic organs.
In order to evaluate patients’ initial status and the effects of Amberen on the vasomotor and psychosomatic symptoms of the climacteric syndrome, the Greene Climacteric Scale and Spielberger–Hanin anxiety test were employed. The Spielberger–Hanin test evaluates situational anxiety (SA), personal anxiety (PA) and actual anxiety (AA)—an integral anxiety indicator. At the beginning and throughout the course of the study, blood levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (RIA Kits, Immunotech A.S., Prague, Czech Republic) and leptin (RIA-1624, DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg, Germany) were measured.
After initial evaluation and randomization, the patients received the following treatment: two capsules (one white, 200 mg and one orange, 200 mg), once a day, in the morning with a meal, for 90 days. The placebo capsules contained high purity corn starch and looked identical to the Amberen capsules. The patients were given a 30-day Amberen/placebo supply at each visit. Evaluation of changes in the above-mentioned parameters from the initial values was done monthly.
The data obtained during the study was analyzed using MSOffice 2010 and Statistica 12. Comparison of the median/mean values for each parameter in the groups was done using Mann–Whitney U-test (nonparametric statistics) or Student’s t-test (for normal distribution). The Friedman test was used in dynamic analysis. For calculations of the Greene Climacteric Scale scores between groups, χ2 test was used. Differences were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05 (95% confidence level).
Results
All of the 125 randomized patients completed the study: 62 in the Amberen group and 63 in the Placebo group. The mean age of the study population was 52.4 ± 5.02 years in the Amberen group and 51.97 ± 4.25 years in the Placebo group, and did not differ significantly. Seven (5.6%) of the patients were perimenopausal and 118 (94.4%) were postmenopausal.
Clinical evaluations and the analysis of medical documentation revealed gynecological or other pathologies in 61 (98.39%) patients in the Amberen group and in 60 (95.24%) patients in the Placebo group, with all illnesses in remission. Anthropometric parameters, initial results of the blood panels (general and biochemical), urinalysis, levels of apolipoproteins A1 and B, estradiol and gonadotropins did not differ significantly between the two groups. Results of the initial Greene test [Citation16,Citation17] () and Spielberger–Hanin test () evaluations were mostly comparable between the Amberen and placebo groups. The exceptions were the difficulty sleeping, difficulty concentrating, loss of interest in most things, irritability, headaches and loss of interest in sex symptoms, which occurred more frequently in the Amberen group.
Table 1. The Greene Climacteric Scale results.
Table 2. Spielberger–Hanin test results.
In the Amberen group, analysis of the Greene Climacteric Scale results showed a decrease in the number of complains with reduction in their severity for the following symptoms (): feeling tense or nervous, difficulty sleeping, increased excitability, difficulty concentrating, feeling tired or lacking energy, loss of interest in most things, sadness or depression, crying spells, irritability, feeling of pressure or tightness in the head or other body parts, headaches, muscle and joint pain, hot flashes, night sweats and loss of interest in sex. Comparative analysis between the Amberen and placebo groups at the end of the study showed statistically significant differences in the following symptoms: increased heartrate or palpitations, difficulty sleeping, increased excitability, difficulty concentrating, feeling tired or lacking energy, loss of interest in most things, sadness or depression, irritability, headaches, muscle and joint pain, hot flashes, night sweats and loss of interest in sex. After 2 months of treatment, the symptoms that were initially more frequent in the Amberen group were observed with statistical significance more frequently in the placebo group.
Based on the results of the Spielberger–Hanin test (), the Amberen group had worse anxiety scores than the placebo group. After 1 month of treatment, all anxiety parameters had a statistically significant decrease in the Amberen group. Compared to the placebo group, Amberen patients showed a statistically significant decrease in PA and AA after 1 month of treatment and in SA, PA and AA after 2 months of treatment.
Analysis of the blood plasma hormones showed initial difference in the estradiol levels between the two groups with a statistically significantly higher concentration of the hormone in the placebo group. During the course of the study, patients in the Amberen group showed a significant increase in the estradiol concentrations, and after 2 months of treatment the levels of estradiol were statistically significantly higher than those in the Placebo group (). In the Amberen group, the levels of FSH and LH decreased with statistical significance after 2 months of treatment, but no significant difference in their values compared to the placebo group was observed. In the Amberen group, concentrations of leptin were characterized by a significant reduction that was approaching normal levels; in the placebo group, we observed an increase in the levels of the hormone. At the end of the treatment, there was a statistically significant difference in leptin levels between the two groups.
Table 3. Blood plasma hormone levels.
In the Amberen group, there was a small but statistically significant (р < 0.05) decrease in body weight of 4% compared to the initial measurements, from 75.5 ± 11.6 to 72.49 ± 10.02 kg, BMI: by 4.05% from 28.42 ± 4.97 to 27.27 ± 4.29 kg/m2, waist circumference: by 3.64% from 86.55 ± 11.47 to 83.43 ± 10.34 cm. In the placebo group, there was a small increase (р < 0.05) of the above-mentioned parameters: body weight from 74.85 ± 15.47 to 75.69 ± 15.64 kg, BMI from 27.87 ± 5.76 to 28.19 ± 5.84 kg/m2 and waist circumference from 85 ± 13.7 to 86.06 ± 13.81 cm.
Evaluation of the clinical and laboratory safety parameters did not reveal any differences between Amberen and placebo. No adverse reactions were observed.
Discussion
The results of this study demonstrated that a course of dietary supplement Amberen has a positive effect on the menopausal symptoms. Based on the Greene test analysis, patients saw improvements in difficulty sleeping, increased excitability, difficulty concentrating, feeling tired or lacking energy, loss of interest in most things, sadness or depression, crying spells, irritability, headaches, muscle and joint pain, hot flashes, night sweats and loss of interest in sex.
The mechanism of Amberen’s action is not entirely clear. When speculating on the mechanism, one should recall that the main cause of the vasomotor complaints is the decrease in the levels of estrogens [Citation18], likely leading to the dysfunctions of the brain’s neuronal systems, which experience a type of deprivation due to the changes in the usual hormonal homeostasis [Citation19].
Amberen affects blood hormones and leads to a statistically significant increase in estradiol levels, which can in part explain the positive effect of the supplement on the menopausal symptoms. Estradiol’s effect on various tissues is directly related to its blood levels. Higher concentrations of estradiol are necessary to initiate endometrial growth, compared to those needed for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms [Citation20,Citation21]. Estradiol levels <80 pg/ml allow for therapeutic effects and remain safe in terms of excess proliferation. Thus, the average estradiol levels of 66 pg/ml achieved in our study can be considered physiologically comfortable and safe.
The aging of the central nervous system (CNS) and the decline in hypothalamic sensitivity to peripheral hormone signals play a significant role in the formation of the menopausal symptoms [Citation22]. At the same time, steroid sex hormones affect the psychological functions of the nervous system: behavior, mood, learning, memory and verbal abilities [Citation23].
Amberen treatment allowed for the stabilization of the patients’ psychological status, as evidenced by the results of the Greene Climacteric Scale and Spielberger–Hanin test. The frequency of depressive dysfunctions significantly deceased in women who took Amberen, compared to both the initial evaluation and the results in the Placebo group. A statistically significant decrease in anxiety (SA, PA, AA components) speaks to an increase in the women’s stress resistance, improvement in their adaptability, and general normalization of the psychological state.
These positive changes can be explained by other factors, beyond the “estrogen influence” hypothesis. A loss of adaptive abilities in any tissue is closely related to mitochondrial dysfunction, which lies in the base of both the CNS functional disruptions and formation of neurodegenerative diseases, including in postmenopausal women [Citation24,Citation25]. Moreover, cells with damaged mitochondria, react to estrogen signals in a different manner [Citation26], producing negative clinical effects instead of the expected positive ones. Increased estradiol levels in combination with the improved mitochondrial function produced during Amberen supplementation allows for a high degree of safety and predictability in the treatment.
Stabilization of body weight and prophylactics against obesity take a special place in management of menopausal women. The problem of weight gain in women during peri- and postmenopausal periods is well known [Citation27], but the cellular component of the cardiometabolic risk is often underestimated. Dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia and inflammation (all of which are tied to obesity) initiate secondary mitochondrial dysfunction [Citation28,Citation29], that has an immediate effect on tissues’ functions. Amberen supplementation led to a statistically significant decrease in weight, BMI, and waist circumference. The reduction of fat tissue is indirectly shown by a statistically significant decrease in leptin levels [Citation30,Citation31]; this allows one to speculate about positive effects of the treatment in terms of the metabolic risk.
Therefore, dietary supplement Amberen has multiple positive effects and can be used to treat menopausal symptoms in women during menopausal transition and postmenopause.
Declaration of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.
Lunada Biomedical provided funding for this study.
References
- Freeman EW, Sammel MD, Lin H, et al. Duration of menopausal hot flushes and associated risk factors. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:1095–104
- Whiteley J, DiBonaventura M, Wagner JS, et al. The impact of menopausal symptoms on quality of life, productivity, and economic outcomes. J Womens Health 2013;22:983–90
- Williams RE, Kalilani L, DiBenedetti DB, et al. Frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms among peri- and postmenopausal women in the United States. Climacteric 2008;11:32–43
- Cho GJ, Lee JH, Park HT, et al. Postmenopausal status according to years since menopause as an independent risk factor for the metabolic syndrome. Menopause 2008;15:524–9
- Sperling LS, Mechanick JI, Neeland IJ, et al. The cardiometabolic health alliance: working toward a new care model for the metabolic syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:1050–67
- Ortmann O, Dören M, Windler E. Hormone therapy in perimenopause and postmenopause (HT). Interdisciplinary S3 Guideline, Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany AWMF 015/062-short version. Arch Gynecol Obstetr 2011;284:343–55
- Schmidt P. The 2012 hormone therapy position statement of the North American Menopause Society. Menopause 2012;19:257–71
- Sturdee D, Pines A. Updated IMS recommendations on postmenopausal hormone therapy and preventive strategies for midlife health. Climacteric 2011;14:302–20
- Sood R, Faubion SS, Kuhle CL, et al. Prescribing menopausal hormone therapy: an evidence-based approach. Int J Womens Health 2014;6:47–57
- Hill DA, Hill SR. Counseling patients about hormone therapy and alternatives for menopausal symptoms. Am Fam Physician 2010;82:801–7
- Loprinzi CL, Qin R, Balcueva EP, et al. Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of pregabalin for alleviating hot flashes, N07C1. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:641–7
- Evans M, Elliott JG, Sharma P, et al. The effect of synthetic genistein on menopause symptom management in healthy postmenopausal women: a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Maturitas 2011;68:189–96
- Chen TT, Maevsky EI, Uchitel ML. Maintenance of homeostasis in the aging hypothalamus: the central and peripheral roles of succinate. Front Endocrinol 2015;6:7. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2015.00007
- Maevsky EI, Peskov AB, Uchitel ML, et al. A succinate-based composition reverses menopausal symptoms without sex hormone replacement therapy. Adv Gerontol 2008;21:298–305
- Harlow SD, Gass M, Hall JE, et al. Executive summary of the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop+ 10: addressing the unfinished agenda of staging reproductive aging. Climacteric 2012;15:105–14
- Greene J. Guide to the Greene climacteric scale. Glasgow: University of Glasgow. 1991
- Greene JG. Constructing a standard climacteric scale. Maturitas 1998;29:25–31
- Ziv-Gal A, Flaws JA. Factors that may influence the experience of hot flushes by healthy middle-aged women. J Womens Health 2010;19:1905–14
- Freedman RR. Menopausal hot flashes: mechanisms, endocrinology, treatment. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2014;142:115–20
- Schilling C, Gallicchio L, Miller SR, et al. Genetic polymorphisms, hormone levels, and hot flashes in midlife women. Maturitas 2007;57:120–31
- Sinchak K, Wagner EJ. Estradiol signaling in the regulation of reproduction and energy balance. Front Neuroendocrinol 2012;33:342–63
- Skurnick JH, Weiss G, Goldsmith LT, et al. Longitudinal changes in hypothalamic and ovarian function in perimenopausal women with anovulatory cycles: relationship with vasomotor symptoms. Fertil Steril 2009;91:1127–34
- Toffoletto S, Lanzenberger R, Gingnell M, et al. Emotional and cognitive functional imaging of estrogen and progesterone effects in the female human brain: a systematic review. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2014;50:28–52
- Long J, He P, Shen Y, Li R. New evidence of mitochondria dysfunction in the female Alzheimer’s disease brain: deficiency of estrogen receptor-β. J Alzheimers Dis 2012;30:545–58
- Markham A, Bains R, Franklin P, Spedding M. Changes in mitochondrial function are pivotal in neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders: how important is BDNF? Br J Pharmacol 2014;171:2206–29
- Velarde MC. Pleiotropic actions of estrogen: a mitochondrial matter. Physiol Genomics 2013;45:106–9
- Sowers M, Zheng H, Tomey K, et al. Changes in body composition in women over six years at midlife: ovarian and chronological aging. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:895–901
- Scarpulla RC. Transcriptional paradigms in mammalian mitochondrial biogenesis and function. Physiol Rev 2008;88:611–38
- Osellame LD, Blacker TS, Duchen MR. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of mitochondrial function. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metabol 2012;26:711–23
- Fischer-Posovszky P, Wabitsch M, Hochberg Z. Endocrinology of adipose tissue-an update. Horm Metab Res 2007;39:314–21
- Soni AC, Conroy MB, Mackey RH, Kuller LH. Ghrelin, leptin, adiponectin, and insulin levels and concurrent and future weight change in overweight postmenopausal women. Menopause 2011;18:296