785
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Pathogen reduction technologies: The pros and cons for platelet transfusion

, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 2-8 | Received 20 Feb 2017, Accepted 07 Mar 2017, Published online: 19 May 2017
 

Abstract

The transfusion of platelets is essential for diverse pathological conditions associated with thrombocytopenia or platelet disorders. To maintain optimal platelet quality and functions, platelets are stored as platelet concentrates (PCs) at room temperature under continuous agitation—conditions that are permissive for microbial proliferation. In order to reduce these contaminants, pathogen reduction technologies (PRTs) were developed by the pharmaceutical industry and subsequently implemented by blood banks. PRTs rely on chemically induced cross-linking and inactivation of nucleic acids. These technologies were initially introduced for the treatment of plasma and, more recently, for PCs given the absence of a nucleus in platelets. Several studies verified the effectiveness of PRTs to inactivate a broad array of bacteria, viruses, and parasites. However, the safety of PRT-treated platelets has been questioned in other studies, which focused on the impact of PRTs on platelet quality and functions. In this article, we review the literature regarding PRTs, and present the advantages and disadvantages related to their application in platelet transfusion medicine.

Declaration of interest

The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Foundation program (to E.B) and the Canadian Blood Services (to P.P and E.B). E.B is recipient of a Canadian Institutes of Health Research new investigator award. A.M is a recipient of an award from Mitacs. J.L is a recipient of a graduate fellowship from the Canadian Blood Services. No funding bodies had any role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the view of the federal government.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Foundation program (to E.B) and the Canadian Blood Services (to P.P and E.B). E.B is recipient of a Canadian Institutes of Health Research new investigator award. A.M is a recipient of an award from Mitacs. J.L is a recipient of a graduate fellowship from the Canadian Blood Services. No funding bodies had any role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the view of the federal government.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.