371
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Psoriasis and dermatitis

Comparison of mental health outcomes among adults with psoriasis on biologic versus oral therapies: a population-based study

, &
Pages 135-140 | Received 20 Apr 2018, Accepted 07 May 2018, Published online: 29 May 2018
 

Abstract

Purpose: We sought to compare the impact of biologic versus oral therapies on mental health outcomes among adult U.S. residents with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Methods: We performed a nationwide, cross-sectional study comparing 2,303,534 (weighted) adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis on biologic versus oral therapies and their associated mental health outcomes using the 2003–2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). Mental health outcomes were measured with the Kessler 6 (K6), a validated measure of psychological distress, and Patient Health Questionnaire 2 (PHQ2), a screening tool for depression.

Results: The mean K6 score for residents on biologic therapies was significantly lower than that of residents on oral therapies (2.72 [95% CI: 2.27–3.17] versus 3.70 [95% CI: 3.27–4.12]; p < .001). The mean PHQ2 score for residents on biologic therapies was also significantly lower than that of residents on oral therapies (0.540 [95% CI: 0.390–0.690] versus 0.890 [95% CI: 0.749–1.031]; p < .001). Based on adjusted multivariable linear regression models, biologic therapy was associated with significant reductions in K6 (p < .001) and PHQ2 (p = .016) scores compared to oral therapy.

Conclusions: Therapeutic choices for psoriasis impact mental health outcomes. Biologic therapy is associated with reductions in psychological distress and depression as compared to oral therapy in the U.S. adult moderate-to-severe psoriasis population.

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted with publicly available, de-identified data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s (AHRQ) MEPS.

Disclosure statement

Nicole Salame and Nazanin Ehsani-Chimeh declare that they have no conflict of interest. April W. Armstrong has no relevant financial conflict of interest; other disclosures include her role as an investigator, consultant, advisor, and/or speaker to AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi, Regeneron, Leo, Science 37, Modmed, Pfizer, Ortho Dermatologics, and Modernizing Medicine.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.