907
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Preface to the IJRB 60th anniversary special issue “back to our future”

ORCID Icon, &

The International Journal of Radiation Biology (IJRB), often called the “blue” journal in the radiation research community, became 60 years old in 2019. Its predecessor, The International Journal of Radiation Biology and Related Studies in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine published the first issue in 1959. The journal name reflected the intention ‘to bring together all interests concerned with the biological effects of ionizing radiations. The field we (IJRB) hope to cover will not be a narrow one, for it will embrace any discipline—medicine, physics and chemistry, for example—which has a bearing on our main theme’ (Editorial Citation1959). In 1988, it was renamed International Journal of Radiation Biology and was dedicated to reviewing and publishing studies on the biological effects of various forms of ionizing and nonionizing radiation. The name has remained unchanged since 1988; however, since January 2018, IJRB has regained its longer title as a subtitle and continues to encourage submission from radiation biology and other various radiation-related disciplines (Woloschak Citation2018). Since its inception in 1959 through June 2019 (Volume 95 Issue 6), IJRB has thus far published 9397 articles in 683 issues (). IJRB celebrated its 50th anniversary in 2009 by publishing a series of the anniversary reviews (Volume 85). Another decade has passed since then, and IJRB now celebrates its 60th anniversary with various activities (Woloschak Citation2019): e.g. by publishing this Special Issue in July 2019 (Volume 95 Issue 7, as its 684th issue of IJRB), and then by holding a dedicated session on 28 August 2019 during the 16th International Congress of Radiation Research (ICRR2019) in Manchester, UK.

Figure 1. Cumulative number of issues (panel A) and articles (panel B) published from 1959 through June 2019. Articles consist of editorial/preface/foreword, review papers, original papers, short communications, technical notes, commentaries, letters to editor, meeting reports, book reviews, diary of events/news and events, announcements, obituaries, errata/corrigenda, etc. It can be seen from these panels that the cumulative number of both issues and articles increased fairly steadily over the past 60 years. The cumulative number of the articles is expected to exceed 10,000 around 2023.

Figure 1. Cumulative number of issues (panel A) and articles (panel B) published from 1959 through June 2019. Articles consist of editorial/preface/foreword, review papers, original papers, short communications, technical notes, commentaries, letters to editor, meeting reports, book reviews, diary of events/news and events, announcements, obituaries, errata/corrigenda, etc. It can be seen from these panels that the cumulative number of both issues and articles increased fairly steadily over the past 60 years. The cumulative number of the articles is expected to exceed 10,000 around 2023.

This Special Issue consists of 20 review papers that give historical overviews on various topics in radiation research. The title ‘Back to Our Future’ reflects the brief given to the authors – to take a topic which was popular in the early issues of the journal and to see how the field had developed over the 60 years since the journal started. First, to explore legacy and impact of the IJRB papers in general, Rusin and Hamada (Citation2019) assessed its citations in Radiation Research (the official journal of the Radiation Research Society that published its first issue in 1954) and ICRP publications (Publication 1 issued in 1959 by the International Commission on Radiological Protection). The cover image of the Special Issue was taken from in Rusin and Hamada (Citation2019), and we would appreciate Mr Rusin for his idea to do such analysis. Cho et al. (Citation2019) review historical changes in situations of funding, education and training in the field of radiation research, particularly in Canada, European Union countries, Japan, South Korea, and the US. Wojcik and Harms-Ringdahl (Citation2019) provide a historical review of how radiation protection biology developed and how it influences the field of radiation protection. Mothersill and Seymour (Citation2019) consider how the old ideas in the studies of low dose effects evolved, leading to apparently abrupt paradigm shifts. Schofield et al. (Citation2019) review the creation, sustainability and reuse of legacy data, and discuss the importance of open data and biomaterial archives for contemporary radiobiological sciences, radioecology and epidemiology. Ozasa et al. (Citation2019) review cancer and non-cancer effects in Japanese atomic bomb survivors and also in their F1 offspring. Gault et al. (Citation2019) review the results from the studies on the low dose responses of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells performed under the RISK-IR project (www.risk-ir.eu). Peitzsch et al. (Citation2019) discuss modern methods developed to study cancer stem cells (CSCs) in radiation biology, the role of CSCs in personalized cancer therapy, as well as future directions for CSC research in translational radiation oncology. Vaupel et al. (Citation2019) review the mechanisms and consequences of the Warburg effect as a central contributor to the cancer progression machinery. Groves and Williams (Citation2019) review IJRB papers on the protection of normal tissues from unwanted radiation injury or its rescue from the downstream consequences of radiation exposure. Ko and Formenti (Citation2019) review key evidence for the ability of radiation therapy to influence tumor-directed immune responses. Moulder (Citation2019) reviews the IJRB papers related to chemical radiosensitizers. Shibata and Jeggo (Citation2019) provide a historical reflection on key advances in the field of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand break repair and interface them with current knowledge. Goodhead (Citation2019) provides selective summaries of main driving forces and developments in the neutron biology field. Cucinotta and Cacao (Citation2019) review findings from studies on brain effects of radiation carried out over the last 25 years and focusing on understanding risks at low doses of heavy ions and protons. Nakamura (Citation2019) reviews the history of radiation genetics studies with an attempt to discern future directions. Salbu et al. (Citation2019) review the multiple stressor concept from the viewpoint of radioecology, and point out the importance to recognize that after low dose exposures many stressors act through common mechanisms involving oxidative stress. This analysis echoes the work done in the early days of the journal, where additive and synergistic effects of chemicals and radiation in the environment were a hot topic. Seymour and Mothersill (Citation2019) and Streffer (Citation2019), respectively, provide historical reflections on the contributions of Robin H. Mole and Hanns Langendorff to radiation biology, both of whom were pioneers of the journal in the early days. Last, Powers and Murphy (Citation2019) review a series of the studies on the effects of sunlight radiation.

Last but not least, the Editors of this Special Issue are grateful to all distinguished authors for their invaluable contributions and are indebted to the expert reviewers for their time, dedication and constructive comments. We wish to acknowledge IJRB for the opportunity to guest edit this Special Issue and extend our special thanks in this respect to Gayle E. Woloschak (the Editor-in-Chief of the journal) and Dianne Dixon (the Managing Editor of the journal). Many thanks also go to the ICRR2019 Organizing Committee for an opportunity to hold the IJRB session.

We sincerely hope that this Special Issue will serve as a historical landmark that will inspire not only the current and future contributors and readership of IJRB, but also the entire radiation research community. We are confident that the IJRB continues to flourish in the coming years and that it will celebrate its centenary in 2059.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

References

  • Cho K, Imaoka T, Klokov D, Paunesku T, Salomaa S, Birschwilks M, Bouffler S, Brooks AL, Hei TK, Iwasaki T, et al. 2019. Funding for radiation research: past, present and future. Int J Radiat Biol. 95. DOI:10.1080/09553002.2018.1558303
  • Cucinotta FA, Cacao E. 2019. Risks of cognitive detriments after low dose heavy ion and proton exposures. Int J Radiat Biol. 95. DOI:10.1080/09553002.2019.1623427
  • Editorial. 1959. Int J Radiat Biol. 1:1.
  • Gault N, Verbiest T, Badie C, Romeo PH, Bouffler S. 2019. Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell responses to low radiation doses – implications for leukemia risk. Int J Radiat Biol. 95. DOI:10.1080/09553002.2019.1569777
  • Goodhead DT. 2019. Neutrons are forever! Historical perspectives. Int J Radiat Biol. 95. DOI:10.1080/09553002.2019.1569782
  • Groves AM, Williams JP. 2019. Saving normal tissues – a goal for the ages. Int J Radiat Biol. 95. DOI:10.1080/09553002.2019.1589654
  • Ko EC, Formenti SC. 2019. Radiation therapy to enhance tumor immunotherapy: a novel application for an established modality. Int J Radiat Biol. 95. DOI:10.1080/09553002.2019.1623429
  • Mothersill C, Seymour C. 2019. Targets, pools, shoulders and communication – a reflection on the evolution of low dose radiobiology. Int J Radiat Biol. 95. DOI:10.1080/09553002.2019.1589016
  • Moulder JE. 2019. Chemical radiosensitizers: the journal history. Int J Radiat Biol. 95. DOI:10.1080/09553002.2019.1569779
  • Nakamura N. 2019. History of radiation genetics: light and darkness. Int J Radiat Biol. 95. DOI:10.1080/09553002.2019.1572251
  • Ozasa K, Cullings HM, Ohishi W, Hida A, Grant EJ. 2019. Epidemiological studies of atomic bomb radiation at the Radiation Effects Research Foundation. Int J Radiat Biol. 95. DOI:10.1080/09553002.2019.1569778
  • Peitzsch C, Kurth I, Ebert N, Dubrovska A, Baumann M. 2019. Cancer stem cells in radiation response: current views and future perspectives in radiation oncology. Int J Radiat Biol. 95. DOI:10.1080/09553002.2019.1589023
  • Powers JM, Murphy JEJ. 2019. Sunlight radiation as a villain and hero: 60 years of illuminating research. Int J Radiat Biol. 95. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2019.1627440
  • Rusin A, Hamada N. 2019. Exploring the legacy and impact of historical IJRB articles and contributions to ICRP publications and Radiation Research articles through graphical reference mapping. Int J Radiat Biol. 95. DOI:10.1080/09553002.2019.1587195
  • Salbu B, Teien HC, Lind OC, Tollefsen KE. 2019. Why is the multiple stressor concept of relevance to radioecology? Int J Radiat Biol. 95. DOI:10.1080/09553002.2019.1605463
  • Schofield PN, Kulka U, Tapio S, Grosche B. 2019. Big data in radiation biology and epidemiology; an overview of the historical and contemporary landscape of data and biomaterial archives. Int J Radiat Biol. 95. DOI:10.1080/09553002.2019.1589026
  • Seymour C, Mothersill C. 2019. Early authors – R. H. Mole. Int J Radiat Biol. 95. DOI:10.1080/09553002.2019.1569780
  • Shibata A, Jeggo P. 2019. A historical reflection on our understanding of radiation-induced DNA double strand break repair in somatic mammalian cells; interfacing the past with the present. Int J Radiat Biol. 95. DOI:10.1080/09553002.2018.1564083
  • Streffer C. 2019. Radiobiology at the forefront: Hanns Langendorff and two of his disciples. Int J Radiat Biol. 95. DOI:10.1080/09553002.2019.1623428
  • Vaupel P, Schmidberger H, Mayer A. 2019. The Warburg effect: Essential part of metabolic reprogramming and central contributor to cancer progression. Int J Radiat Biol. 95. DOI:10.1080/09553002.2019.1589653
  • Wojcik A, Harms-Ringdahl M. 2019. Radiation protection biology then and now. Int J Radiat Biol. 95. DOI:10.1080/09553002.2019.1589027
  • Woloschak GE. 2018. IJRB: looking toward the future. Int J Radiat Biol. 94:1.
  • Woloschak GE. 2019. Reflections on the coming year: IJRB 2019. Int J Radiat Biol. 95:97–98.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.