Cellular Uptake of Misonidazole and Analogues with Acidic or Basic Functions

Summary

Average intracellular concentrations of five radiosensitizers in hamster fibroblast-like V79-379A cells in vitro were measured by high performance liquid chromatography, varying the extracellular pH (pH_e) and estimating the apparent intracellular pH from the distribution of 5,5-dimethyloxazolidine-2,4-dione. The intracellular: extracellular concentration ratio for the 2-nitroimidazole, misonidazole was constant at about 0·7 for pH_e = 6·6–7·6, whereas the weak base, Ro 03-8799 (1-(2-nitro-1-imidazolyl)-3-N-piperidino-2-propanol) was concentrated intracellularly at pH_e = 7·3–7·4 by a factor of 3·3, the factor increasing from about 0·8 at pH_e = 6·0, to 7·5 at pH_e = 7·85. The weak acid, azomycin (2-nitroimidazole) showed approximately constant uptake (factor 1·1) between pH_e = 6·0–7·0, decreasing to 0·8 at pH_e = 7·3 and 0·4 at pH_e = 7·8. Measurements of intracellular uptake of Ro 31-0052 (the more hydrophilic and less basic 3′-hydroxypiperidino analogue of Ro 03-8799) and of Ro 31-0258 (3-(2-nitro-1-imidazolyl)propionic acid, a stronger acid than azomycin) were made for comparison. The results were compared with theoretical calculations of pH-induced concentration gradients; the time dependence of the uptake of the bases is not at present clearly understood. These measurements of uptake are broadly consistent with the distribution of misonidazole and Ro 03-8799 in human and animal tissues and provide a useful insight into the likely intracellular concentrations in the clinical use of Ro 03-8799 or other basic radiosensitizers. The measurements also resolve the apparent discrepancy in radiosensitizer efficiency for weak bases in vitro and in vivo which has been previously noted.

• radiosensitizers
• nitroimidazoles
• cellular uptake
• concentration gradients
• pH