231
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentaries

Critical posthuman ethnography: grappling with human-more-than-human interconnection for critical public health

ORCID Icon
Pages 848-855 | Received 24 Aug 2022, Accepted 14 Oct 2023, Published online: 30 Oct 2023
 

ABSTRACT

To address the intertwined health issues of our time, from climate change to colonialism, from mass extinction to mass consumption, this commentary argues that critical public health must grapple with relationality onto-epistemologically. In it, I offer the provocation that entangling ethnography, both as method and methodology, with critical posthumanism can offer the potential to hold the tensions, nuances and multiplicities needed to account for human-more-than-human relationality as multiple inputs of data. This argument is made in three parts: first, via a discussion of relationality within public health; second, by means of a cartography of critical posthumanism; and third, with a discussion of how a critical posthuman ethnography might disrupt anthropocentric approaches to health. The paper concludes with a discussion of the possibilities of, and potential for, critical posthuman ethnography in public health research. In summary, critical posthuman ethnography provides one way of methodologically approaching some of the intertwined health issues of our time.

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank Amaya Perez-Brumer, Brenda Gladstone and Fady Shanouda for their generous feedback on this commentary.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1. Abram (Citation1996) employs the term ‘more-than-human’ in reference to the ‘sensuous terrain’ around us with which we are in continual interaction, noting that if we are inattentive to our interactions with the more-than-human world, we may unintentionally invisibilize the limitations of the human.

2. For further reading on agency, affect, and emotionality in relation to multispecies health, see Haraway (Citation2016), Van Dooren (Citation2019), and Verlie (Citation2021).

Additional information

Funding

This commentary was supported by funds from a Joseph-Armand Bombardier Canada Doctoral Scholarship and a Queen Elizabeth II Inge and Ralf Hoffman Graduate Scholarships in Science and Technology.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.