“In the physio we trust”: A qualitative study on patients’ preferences for physiotherapy

ABSTRACT

Background: Patients’ preferences should be integrated in evidence-based practice. This study aimed to explore patients’ preferences for physiotherapy treatment and participation in decision making. Methods: A qualitative study set in an urban physiotherapy clinic in Gothenburg, Sweden. Individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 individuals who sought physiotherapy for musculoskeletal disorders. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed with qualitative content analysis. Results: An overarching theme, embracing six categories, was conceptualized: Trust in the physiotherapist fosters active engagement in therapy. The participants preferred active treatment strategies such as exercise and advice for self-management, allowing them to actively engage in their therapy. Some preferred passive treatments. Key influencers on treatment preferences were previous experiences and media. All participants wanted to be involved in the clinical decision making, but to varying extents. Some expressed a preference for an active role and wanting to share decisions while others were content with a passive role. Expectations for a professional management were reflected in trust and confidence in physiotherapists’ skills and competence, expectations for good outcomes, and believing that treatment methods should be evidence-based. Conclusion: Trust in the physiotherapist’s competence, as well as a desire to participate in clinical decision making, fosters active engagement in physiotherapy.

KEYWORDS:

• Guidelines
• patient preferences
• physical therapy
• primary care
• shared decision making

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the study participants for their time and willingness to share their views and provide data for this study.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

Funding

Financial support was provided by The Local Research and Development Board for Gothenburg and Södra Bohuslän.

Additional information

Funding

Financial support was provided by The Local Research and Development Board for Gothenburg and Södra Bohuslän.