495
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

An exploratory study of gait and functional outcomes after neuroprosthesis use in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy

, , , , &
Pages 2277-2285 | Received 05 Mar 2016, Accepted 15 Aug 2016, Published online: 16 Sep 2016
 

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the immediate orthotic, total and therapeutic effects of functional electrical stimulation (FES) neuroprosthesis use on clinic based measures of gait and function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy.

Methods: Eleven children (mean 9 years 11 months) participated in an FES neuroprosthesis (Ness L300) intervention (4 week accommodation period followed by 12 weeks of daily use) and were assessed at baseline and post in stimulation off and stimulation on conditions. Measures included clinic based outcomes of gait and function.

Results: No significant immediate orthotic effects were observed. Significant (p < 0.01) total effects were noted for dorsiflexion at initial contact, Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), and walking speed. A significant therapeutic effect was found for steps off path on the Standardized Walking Obstacle Course (SWOC).

Conclusions: Results support previous findings of neuroprosthesis total effects on gait and provide some evidence for effects on function. Therapeutic effects remain unclear.

    Implications for Rehabilitation

  • In this study, children with hemiplegic CP did not demonstrate immediate improvements in gait or function at their first clinic visit using the FES neuroprosthesis device suggesting one visit using the device is not sufficient to determine potential benefits.

  • Over time with daily use of the FES neuroprosthesis, ankle dorsiflexion in swing and at initial contact, walking speed and endurance increased with the device worn.

  • Overtime, no carryover effects in ankle dorsiflexion in swing and at initial contact were noted at the end of the intervention period with the device off.

  • Clinicians should consider purchasing units to loan or rent to individuals to trial a device at home before determining long-term potential for benefit.

Acknowledgements

This work was completed by Amy Bailes in partial fulfillment of a PhD. in Clinical Epidemiology from the Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio USA. The authors thank Dr. Paul Succop who unfortunately passed away before seeing this manuscript to completion for his guidance and mentorship during design and execution of this study, Dr. Erin Haynes for her support through the process, Ashley Neff for her assistance with data entry and preparation and Bioness Inc. for donation of the L300 units. This study would not have been possible without the participation and commitment of the families and children.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding

This project was supported by a grant from Pedal with Pete Foundation [NA].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.