1,210
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspectives on Rehabilitation

Characteristics and impacts of community aphasia group facilitation: a systematic scoping review

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 6884-6898 | Received 25 May 2021, Accepted 15 Aug 2021, Published online: 09 Oct 2021
 

Abstract

Purpose

Community aphasia groups (CAGs) can provide a range of benefits to people with aphasia and support long-term psychosocial wellbeing. However, the dominant speech-pathologist-led service delivery model is inherently limited in scope. Peer-led groups hold potential as a sustainable and empowering extension of this traditional model. The implementation of peer-led models likely requires targeted training and support, however little is known about the characteristics and impacts of CAG facilitation. This study reviews the literature on CAGs and their facilitation.

Materials and methods

We conducted a scoping review on this topic.

Results

One hundred and seventy-seven texts were included, reporting on a heterogeneous range of activities. Most texts reported on speech-pathologist-led groups, however, a range of alternative models were also represented. While no studies directly compared the impacts of different facilitation models, some comparative benefits could be drawn from the literature. Facilitation was perceived as complex and challenging, and significant gaps were identified in the training of facilitators. Ten qualitative studies investigated characteristics and impacts of facilitator behaviours, providing a useful foundation for future development of training and evaluation tools.

Conclusions

Further investigation into alternative facilitation models and facilitator training needs will likely support the proliferation of high-quality CAGs.

    Implications for Rehabilitation

  • Community aphasia groups (CAGs) play an important role in supporting identity and wellbeing for individuals with chronic aphasia.

  • The traditional speech-pathology led model of group service delivery is limited in scope; the addition of peer- and volunteer-led CAGs may facilitate access to groups and meet a range of different needs for individuals with aphasia.

  • CAG facilitation is a complex and challenging task, likely requiring specialised training, however, this has not been widely available to facilitators.

  • The development of specialised facilitator training will likely support the proliferation of sustainable and high-quality CAGs.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by La Trobe University and the National Health and Medical Research Council (1153236).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.