342
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Non-invasive brain stimulation in the treatment of post-stroke aphasia: a scoping review

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 08 Mar 2023, Accepted 10 Sep 2023, Published online: 13 Oct 2023
 

Abstract

Purpose

Aphasia is an acquired language impairment that commonly results from stroke. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) might accelerate aphasia recovery trajectories and has seen mounting popularity in recent aphasia rehabilitation research. The present review aimed to: (1) summarise all existing literature on NIBS as a post-stroke aphasia treatment; and (2) provide recommendations for future NIBS-aphasia research.

Materials and methods

Databases for published and grey literature were searched using scoping review methodology. 278 journal articles, conference abstracts/posters, and books, and 38 items of grey literature, were included for analysis.

Results

Quantitative analysis revealed that ipsilesional anodal transcranial direct current stimulation and contralesional 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation were the most widely used forms of NIBS, while qualitative analysis identified four key themes including: the roles of the hemispheres in aphasia recovery and their relationship with NIBS; heterogeneity of individuals but homogeneity of subpopulations; individualisation of stimulation parameters; and much remains under-explored in the NIBS-aphasia literature.

Conclusions

Taken together, these results highlighted systemic challenges across the field such as small sample sizes, inter-individual variability, lack of protocol optimisation/standardisation, and inadequate focus on aphasiology. Four key recommendations are outlined herein to guide future research and refine NIBS methods for post-stroke aphasia treatment.

IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

  • A comprehensive review of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) post-stroke aphasia literature, including all study designs, was required.

  • Review of this literature revealed that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation is the mostly commonly used type of NIBS in aphasia treatment research.

  • Systemic challenges across the field hinder prospective translation of NIBS into aphasia practice.

  • Aphasia rehabilitation professionals should note that further research is required before NIBS is suitable for translation into clinical practice.

Disclosure statement

BH has a clinical partnership with Fourier Intelligence and a paid consultancy role with Recovery VR.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council Future Fellowships Grant (grant number: FT210100694) and the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.