113
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

ROK–U.S. cooperation in preparation for hostile actions by North Korea in possession of nuclear weapons

Pages 499-513 | Published online: 10 Dec 2010
 

Abstract

Can the United States' extended deterrence guarantee the security of South Korea against nuclear threats posed by North Korea? North Korea manipulates its nuclear capability not only as a means of deterrence but also as a military leverage to threaten the very existence of South Korea. Considering the current pattern of North Korea's behavior and the geopolitical and strategic implications for the Korean peninsula, the U.S. promise of extended deterrence for South Korea appears to have many limitations. In fact, as demonstrated in the sinking of the ROK naval frigate Cheonan incident, North Korea, with its nuclear capability intact, now threatens South Korean security more openly. Accordingly, measures to increase the credibility of America's extended deterrence become ever more imperative such that it will act as a stronger deterrence against further aggressive actions by North Korea and give greater assurance to South Koreans. The U.S. extended deterrence statement in its Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) is not really adequate, being rather general in its tone and content. This article analyzes this credibility issue pertaining to the U.S. extended deterrence, along with the North Korean nuclear threats and their security implications, and finally proposes a series of measures and policy implications to enhance the ROK–U.S. security mechanism.

Notes

1. Dong-A Ilbo, June 14, 2010.

2. Dong-A Ilbo, June 9, 2010.

3. Morningnews, May 20, 2010, http://morningnews.co.kr/print/php3?no=23065.

4. Dong-A Ilbo, June 14, 2010.

5. Nick Ritchie, "Nuclear weapons and deterrence: Questioning the 'indispensable' relationship." Acronym Institute for Disarmament Diplomacy 2010 and Beyond, http://www.acronym.org.uk/npt/npt2010%20B6%20%20NWs%20&%20Deterrence.pdf.

7. U.S. Department of Defense, Nuclear Posture Review Report (U.S. MOD, April 2010), xii.

8. U.S. Department of Defense, Nuclear Posture Review Report (U.S. MOD, April 2010), 16.

10. U.S. Department of Defense, Nuclear Posture Review Report, 32-3.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.