Publication Cover
Assistive Technology
The Official Journal of RESNA
Volume 28, 2016 - Issue 3
204
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Redesign of a spine board: Proof of concept evaluation

, MD, , PhD, , PhD, PE & , MD
Pages 144-151 | Accepted 04 Dec 2015, Published online: 28 Jul 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Sacral pressure ulcers are a significant problem in individuals following spinal cord injury (SCI) and are felt to be in part due to the high interface-pressures applied to the body while lying on a standard spine board (SSB) during emergency transport. The aim of the present study was to assess the interface pressures and sensing areas between the body and the SSB and two proof of concept spine board prototypes (P-1 and P-2). Ten able-bodied individuals were assessed on each board. Interface pressures and sensing area were recorded every minute over 15 minutes. The highest pressure was generated at the sacral-iliac region. The mean of the peak pressures on the SSB, P-1, and P-2 was 288.6, 202.8, and 102.8 mmHg, respectively. The mean of the sensing areas on the SSB, P-1, and P-2 was 78.2, 98.5, and 109.4 in2, respectively. An analysis using pairwise comparisons test showed the interface pressures were significantly reduced (p = 0.003) and the sensing area was significantly increased (p < 0.001) on P-2 in the sacral-iliac location. This study’s procedures can be used when determining critical factors to guide the redesign of an SSB that reduces interface pressure and increases sensing area.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Daniel Applegate and Jacob Weil who helped in developing P-2 in the MIME Senior Design Clinic at the University of Toledo.

Funding

This work was partially supported by grant (BCS-0931643) from the General & Age-Related Disabilities Engineering (GARDE) Program of the Biomedical Engineering and Engineering Healthcare cluster of the Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems (CBET) division of the National Science Foundation (NSF).

Additional information

Funding

This work was partially supported by grant (BCS-0931643) from the General & Age-Related Disabilities Engineering (GARDE) Program of the Biomedical Engineering and Engineering Healthcare cluster of the Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems (CBET) division of the National Science Foundation (NSF).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 95.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.