Positive Outcomes of Optimizing Student–Preceptor Continuity in a Traditional Block Clerkship

ABSTRACT

Problem: Student–preceptor discontinuity during 3rd-year clerkships limits the quality and quantity of supervision, teaching, and feedback. Although longitudinal integrative clerkships increase continuity and are associated with improved student and preceptor experience, they require schoolwide curricular reform. Alternative innovations enhancing student–preceptor relationships within the constraints of a traditional block clerkship may demonstrate similar benefits. Intervention: We piloted a continuity-enhanced general pediatric ambulatory schedule during 2 consecutive clerkship blocks in 2013. Students in the continuity-enhanced model (n = 29) were assigned 1–3 primary clinic preceptors, whereas those in the traditional model (n = 30) worked with 5–8. Data were gathered from student assessments and anonymous student and preceptor surveys. We used t and Fisher's exact tests to compare the two groups and performed thematic analysis of free-text survey comments. Context: Our school utilizes a block clerkship model with approximately 30 students rotating through the pediatric clerkship every 8 weeks. During the 3-week ambulatory portion, students spend 8 half days in the general pediatric ambulatory clinic. At the conclusion of each clinic, attendings completed brief student evaluation cards. Traditionally, student and attending schedules were created independently, resulting in transient supervisory relationships and dissatisfaction with clinical engagement, feedback, and evaluation. Outcome: Seventy-three percent (43/59) of the students completed the survey. Ten general ambulatory attendings collectively completed 87.5% (35/40) of the monthly surveys. Continuity students received significantly more narrative evaluation comments (10.6 vs. 5.8, p <. 001) from general ambulatory clinic attendings and were more likely to have at least one general ambulatory clinic attending endorse being able to provide meaningful feedback and evaluation (n = 29, 100% vs. n = 20, 66.7%, p <. 001). Continuity students were also more likely to endorse being able to ask at least one of these attendings for a letter of recommendation (71.4% vs. 9.1%, p <. 001) and to have at least one general ambulatory clinic attending endorse being able to provide a meaningful letter of recommendation if asked (62.1% vs. 3.3%, p <. 001). Students (88.4%) and attendings (85.7%) preferred the continuity-enhanced schedule. The most frequent theme of both student and attending free-text survey remarks were relationships and assessment. Lessons Learned: Intentional scheduling of clerkship students to enhance preceptor continuity resulted in significant positive outcomes echoing the relationship-based educational benefits of longitudinal clerkships, particularly in regards to student assessment and feedback. Clerkship directors and other medical educators should consider implementing small changes within block clerkships to maximize student–preceptor continuity.

KEYWORDS:

• clinical clerkship
• undergraduate medical education
• preceptorship
• medical faculty
• feedback

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge members of the Saint Louis University School of Medicine general academic pediatric division as well as the 3rd-year medical students who participated in the study.