714
Views
66
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

20 Years of fish immunotoxicology – what we know and where we are

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 516-542 | Received 29 Apr 2016, Accepted 16 Dec 2016, Published online: 20 Apr 2017
 

Abstract

Despite frequent field observations of impaired immune response and increased disease incidence in contaminant-exposed wildlife populations, immunotoxic effects are rarely considered in ecotoxicological risk assessment. The aim of this study was to review the literature on immunotoxic effects of chemicals in fish to quantitatively evaluate (i) which experimental approaches were used to assess immunotoxic effects, (ii) whether immune markers exist to screen for potential immunotoxic activities of chemicals, and (iii) how predictive those parameters are for adverse alterations of fish immunocompetence and disease resistance. A total of 241 publications on fish immunotoxicity were quantitatively analyzed. The main conclusions included: (i) To date, fish immunotoxicology focused mainly on innate immune responses and immunosuppressive effects. (ii) In numerous studies, the experimental conditions are poorly documented, as for instance age or sex of the fish or the rationale for the selected exposure conditions is often missing. (iii) Although a broad variety of parameters were used to assess immunotoxicity, the rationale for the choice of measured parameters was often not given, remaining unclear how they link to the suspected immunotoxic mode of action of the chemicals. (iv) At the current state of knowledge, it is impossible to identify a set of immune parameters that could reliably screen for immunotoxic potentials of chemicals. (v) Similarly, in fish immunotoxicology there is insufficient understanding of how and when chemical-induced modulations of molecular/cellular immune changes relate to adverse alterations of fish immunocompetence, although this would be crucial to include immunotoxicity in ecotoxicological risk assessment.

View correction statement:
Erratum

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the comments provided by four reviewers selected by the editor and anonymous to the authors. These comments helped to improve the final manuscript.

Declaration of interest

The affiliations of the authors are as shown on the cover page. The authors have sole responsibility for the writing and content of the paper. None of the authors have appeared in regulatory or legal proceedings during the past 5 years related to the contents of the paper. The work was financially supported by the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment [grant M415-0029] and by the EU project SOLUTIONS [grant 603437]. The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Supplemental material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 739.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.