243
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Wide variation in use and interpretation of gene mutation profiling panels among health care providers of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: results of a large web-based survey

ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon, & show all
Pages 1455-1464 | Received 16 Sep 2019, Accepted 17 Jan 2020, Published online: 06 Feb 2020
 

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly employed for diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). We aimed to describe beliefs and practice patterns among providers who treat MDS patients with respect to the utility of NGS in diagnosis, risk stratification, prognosis, and treatment decisions at various points along the disease trajectory, response assessment, and development of institutional guidelines for MDS-specific molecular profiling. Using a 23-question web-based survey in May–June 2018, we identified a widespread use of molecular profiling with MDS-specific panels (N = 53; 39%) and general panels including MDS-related genes (N = 63; 47%), with the majority done at diagnosis (92%). We found substantial variations in genes tested in assays, providers beliefs, practices, testing logistics, and interpretation of results, and recognized multiple challenges limiting a wider utilization of molecular profiling. High-quality data are needed to develop evidence-based guidelines for the role of NGS in the care of MDS patients.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all survey responders for their time and reporting. We extend special thank-you to Marissa Six of the Clinical Education and Awareness Team of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) for her help in the distribution of the survey and collection of data.

Disclosure statement

A.M.Z. received research funding from Celgene, Acceleron, Abbvie, Otsuka, Pfizer, Medimmune/AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Trovagene, Incyte, Takeda, Novartis, Aprea, Astex, and ADC Therapeutics. A.M.Z had a consultancy with and received honoraria from AbbVie, Otsuka, Pfizer, Celgene, Jazz, Incyte, Agios, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Acceleron, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Cardinal Health, Seattle Genetics, BeyondSpring, Trovagene, Takeda, Ionis, and Epizyme. A.M.Z received travel support for meetings from Pfizer, Novartis, and Trovagene. None of these relationships were related to the development of this manuscript. Other authors have no relevant disclosures.

Additional information

Funding

A.M.Z. is a Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Scholar in Clinical Research and is also supported by a NCI’s Cancer Clinical Investigator Team Leadership Award (CCITLA). Research reported in this publication was in part supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number [P30 CA016359]. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,065.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.