132
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A questionnaire survey of general practitioners in Japan’s Kanagawa Prefecture for the Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension 2014

, , &
Pages 705-710 | Received 21 Jan 2017, Accepted 13 Mar 2017, Published online: 08 Sep 2017
 

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension 2014 (JSH2014) among Japanese general practitioners (GPs), we used a questionnaire survey with 209 GPs from the Kanagawa Physicians Society. Overall, 93.6% of GPs felt that the contents of the JSH2014 were useful. Based on the results showing that 81.8% of GPs instructed the measurement of blood pressure (BP) in the early morning at home to most patients, GP’s acceptance of home BP methods and their penetration among patients with hypertension were considerably high. Regarding the number of home BP measurements, percentages for “one time,” “two times,” “three times,” and “as many times as the patient decides,” were 20.2%, 44.9%, 12.2%, and 22.9%, respectively; as such, no consensus was reached. Overall, 80.6% of GPs instructed most patients on sodium restriction; however, the content and method of restriction varied. Furthermore, 14.7% collected spot urine to assess salt intake. Many GPs respected the JSH2014 and faithfully adopted the guidelines during medical care. However, GPs did not necessarily agree with all guidelines. GPs sometimes selected the appropriate method for the individual patients and careful observations of how the guidelines affect actual clinical practice may lead to better medical care.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the members of the Hypertension and Chronic Kidney Disease committee of the Kanagawa Physicians Association whose enormous support and insightful comments were invaluable during the course of my survey. I also owe a very important debt to all members of the Kanagawa Physicians Association who completed this questionnaire.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.