240
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Residual Effects of Novel versus Traditional Organic Amendments for Rain-fed No-till Barley: Yield, Nutrient Uptake, and N2O Emissions

, , &
Pages 219-229 | Published online: 16 Mar 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Organic amendments recycle nutrients, but N2O emissions are both environmental and agronomic concerns. We conducted a 4-year field experiment to determine no-till barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) yield and nutrient uptake and soil N2O emissions following a single application of six amendment treatments: (1) no amendment (Check); (2) synthetic N fertilizer (Fert); (3) fresh beef cattle feedlot manure (ManureF); (4) beef cattle feedlot manure compost (CompostR); (5) beef cattle feedlot manure composted with cattle mortalities (CompostM); and (6) separated solids from anaerobically digested cattle feedlot manure (ADM). Barley grown in Year 1 (2006), Year 2 (2007), and Year 4 (2009) (with Year 3 (2008) under fallow) had higher grain yields from ManureF (4.73 Mg ha−1) in Year 2 and ADM (6.30 Mg ha−1) in Year 4 (p < 0.05) than other treatments. The grain N and P contents were not affected (p > 0.05), but N uptake over 3 years (112.8 kg N ha−1 yr−1), and P uptake in Year 1 (19.1 kg ha−1 yr−1) and Year 2 (14.3 kg ha−1 yr−1) from ManureF, were higher (p < 0.05×) than other treatments. The cumulative N2O emissions from ManureF in Year 1 (1.488 kg N ha−1) and from ADM in Year 2 (1.072 kg N ha−1) were higher (p < 0.05) than other treatments while the fraction of applied N emitted as N2O was small (0.00 to 0.79%) and not affected by treatment. However, the percentages of applied N emitted as N2O from compost and ADM were similar to synthetic fertilizer and livestock manure.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the dedicated technical assistance of Brett Hill, Greg Travis, Pam Caffyn, and Andrew Olson in carrying out field and laboratory work. Special thanks to EcoAg Initiatives Inc., High River, Alberta for providing cattle manure and composts and Himark Biogas Inc. (formerly Highmark Renewables Research), Vegreville, Alberta for providing the separated solids of anaerobically digested manure. This paper is Lethbridge Research Centre contribution no. 38715050.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 83.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.