354
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

African–American Women’s Tobacco and Marijuana Use: The Effects of Social Context and Substance Use Perceptions

, , , , &
Pages 873-884 | Published online: 08 Mar 2019
 

Abstract

Background: Despite the status of tobacco and marijuana as two of the most commonly used substances in the U.S., both have detrimental health and social consequences for disfranchized African–Americans. Substance use may be shaped by social contextual influences from families and peers in African–American communities, and little research has examined perceptions of wrongfulness, harms, and dangers associated with daily tobacco and marijuana use among African–American women. Objectives: This study explores the effects of African–American women’s social context and substance use perceptions (wrongfulness/harmfulness/dangerousness) on daily tobacco and marijuana use. Methods: Survey data was collected in-person from 521 African–American women. Multivariate logistic models identified the significant correlates of women’s daily use of tobacco and marijuana in the past six months. Results: 52.59% of participants reported daily tobacco use and 10.56% used marijuana daily. Multivariate models indicated that women were more likely to be daily tobacco users if they had a family member with a substance use problem or perceived tobacco use to be wrong, harmful, or more dangerous than marijuana. In the models with marijuana as the dependent variable, women who lived with a person who used drugs were more likely to use marijuana daily. Perceiving marijuana use as wrong or harmful to one’s health was protective against daily marijuana use. Conclusions: Findings stress the need for prevention and intervention efforts for African–American women that highlight social context influences and promote greater awareness of the health risks associated with daily tobacco and marijuana use.

Acknowledgments

This research would not have been possible without the Department of Corrections participation; however, the findings and ideas presented are solely those of the authors. We appreciate the women who shared their stories and want to acknowledge the contribution of the interviewers and community partners.

Declaration of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Grant R01DA022967 (PI: Oser), Grant K02DA035116 (PI: Oser), Grant K08DA032296 (PI: Stevens-Watkins), Grant R25DA037190 (PI: Beckwith), and Grant T32DA035200 (PI: Rush).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 943.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.