332
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Gender Differences in Negative Mood, Emotional Intelligence and Tobacco Use among Young Adults

, , &
Pages 1881-1891 | Published online: 12 Jun 2020
 

Abstract

Background: Tobacco use is recognized as a form of addiction and remains a significant health concern. Despite this well accepted problem, the various components associated with tobacco use across gender remain relatively unknown. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between tobacco use and negative moods (anxiety, depression, stress) between men and women. The relationship between emotional intelligence (EI) and attitudes about smoking was also investigated. Methods: A questionnaire was used to determine sociodemographic characteristics, negative moods, EI, smoking behavior, and tobacco-related attitudes (N=350). Results: Amongst individuals who used tobacco products, women reported greater disturbances in stress and anxiety compared to men. In addition, both men and women who used tobacco products reported higher depression scores compared to nonsmokers, however, no gender differences were observed. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that higher EI scores explained negative attitudes about smoking in relation to health concerns. Lastly, women reported stronger attitudes for the restriction of cigarette sales and marketing of tobacco products. Conclusion: These findings support the literature by showing that mood dysregulation is an important factor associated with tobacco use among women. Additionally, we report that specific aspects of EI are psychological constructs closely linked with attitudes about smoking. Future studies elucidating the various components of tobacco use across gender might lead to more effective treatments for smoking.

Acknowledgements

O.V. Torres developed the study concept and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the study design. Data collection was performed by M. Gwin, I. Villalta, and O.V. Torres. Statistical analyses and interpretations were conducted by J.C. Estep and O.V. Torres. All authors reviewed drafts, provided critical feedback, and approved the final version of the manuscript. The authors would like to thank Chantal Razoukhi, Vanessa Cervantes, Kevin Garcia, Lauren Arriola-Sanchez, and Danika LaValle for their valuable assistance and technical support in the preparation of this manuscript. The authors report no conflicts of interest

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 943.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.