393
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Caffeine Motives and Expectancies for Individuals with High Anxiety Sensitivity

&
Pages 610-617 | Published online: 16 Feb 2023
 

Abstract

Background: Anxiety Sensitivity (AS) is a transdiagnostic risk factor that includes fear of the potential physical and psychological consequences of anxiety-related symptoms. Caffeine consumption in high amounts is associated with symptoms of anxiety. Research on the relationship between AS and caffeine consumption has yielded inconsistent results. Objectives: In this study, we conducted an exploratory analysis to examine whether caffeine motives moderated the relationship between AS and high caffeine consumption. We also examined whether caffeine expectancies moderated the relationship between AS and high caffeine consumption. In addition, we assessed the bivariate relationships between AS and caffeine motives and between AS and caffeine expectancies. N = 317 participants completed an online survey using Amazon Mechanical Turk. Results: Results revealed that neither expectancies nor motives interacted with AS to predict high caffeine consumption. There was also no significant main effect of AS on high caffeine consumption. The only significant main effect in the prediction of high caffeine consumption was the use of caffeine for symptom management motives. In our follow-up analyses, high AS participants in the study expected that caffeine consumption would provoke anxiety. They also reported using caffeine for symptom management, taste, and social reasons. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the utility of AS as a predictor or foundation for higher amounts of substance use is not uniform across substances but rather depends on the type of substance in question.

Acknowledgements

We would thank Dr. Daniel White and Dr. Harold Rosenberg for their helpful suggestions and guidance during the initial design of the study.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 943.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.