Abstract
Background
Over-the-counter (OTC) medicines intended for short-term use for self-care may be abused or misused.
Aim
To explore the experiences and perceptions of community pharmacists (dispensers, pharmacists, and pharmacy owners) of the use, abuse, and misuse of OTC medicines by pharmacy customers, and to identify their perceptions of the most appropriate methods to prevent inappropriate use of OTC medicines.
Method
A cross-sectional national online survey to community pharmacists in Finland. A previously validated structured questionnaire was modified. Three national pharmaceutical associations were contacted to help in recruitment of their members (n = 5594, calculated target sample size n = 360). Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted.
Results
In total, 442 responses were received. Most respondents strongly agreed (Md all = 5) that OTC medicines could be abused or misused; pharmacy owners were more likely to strongly agree than pharmacists (p = 0.012). Pharmacy owners were more likely to think that laxatives were liable for abuse than dispensers (p = 0.008), and that travel sickness medicines were liable for misuse than dispensers (p < 0.001) and pharmacists (p = 0.013). Patient counseling was the most commonly employed method to prevent the problem. Respondents perceived that providing training to staff about OTC medicines that can be abused (Md all = 5) was the most appropriate strategy to prevent OTC medicine abuse; pharmacy owners were more likely to strongly agree or agree of this (p = 0.005) than dispensers. Conclusion: Community pharmacists are aware of the liability of OTC medicines for the potential abuse and misuse. They employ various methods as advising and counseling the customer to support the rational use of OTC medicines.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank The Association of Finnish Pharmacies, Finnish Pharmacists’ Association, and The Finnish Pharmacists’ Society for their collaboration and support in recruiting participants.
Declaration of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest of any kind.
Funding
No funding was received for the conduct of this study.