348
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Contributions

Are EMS Call Volume Predictions Based on Demand Pattern Analysis Accurate?

, , , &
Pages 199-203 | Received 19 Sep 2006, Accepted 12 Dec 2006, Published online: 02 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Most EMS systems determine the number of crews they will deploy in their communities andwhen those crews will be scheduled based on anticipated call volumes. Many systems use historical data to calculate their anticipated call volumes, a method of prediction known as demand pattern analysis. Objective. To evaluate the accuracy of call volume predictions calculated using demand pattern analysis. Methods. Seven EMS systems provided 73 consecutive weeks of hourly call volume data. The first 20 weeks of data were used to calculate three common demand pattern analysis constructs for call volume prediction: average peak demand (AP), smoothed average peak demand (SAP), and90th percentile rank (90%R). The 21st week served as a buffer. Actual call volumes in the last 52 weeks were then compared to the predicted call volumes by using descriptive statistics. Results. There were 61,152 hourly observations in the test period. All three constructs accurately predicted peaks andtroughs in call volume but not exact call volume. Predictions were accurate (±1 call) 13% of the time using AP, 10% using SAP, and19% using 90%R. Call volumes were overestimated 83% of the time using AP, 86% using SAP, and74% using 90%R. When call volumes were overestimated, predictions exceeded actual call volume by a median (Interquartile range) of 4 (2–6) calls for AP, 4 (2–6) for SAP, and3 (2–5) for 90%R. Call volumes were underestimated 4% of time using AP, 4% using SAP, and7% using 90%R predictions. When call volumes were underestimated, call volumes exceeded predictions by a median (Interquartile range; maximum under estimation) of 1 (1–2; 18) call for AP, 1 (1–2; 18) for SAP, and2 (1–3; 20) for 90%R. Results did not vary between systems. Conclusion. Generally, demand pattern analysis estimated or overestimated call volume, making it a reasonable predictor for ambulance staffing patterns. However, it did underestimate call volume between 4% and7% of the time. Communities need to determine if these rates of over-and underestimation are acceptable given their resources andlocal priorities.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 85.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.