856
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Systematic Review

Non-Invasive Ventilation in the Prehospital Emergency Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 566-574 | Received 15 Feb 2022, Accepted 27 May 2022, Published online: 22 Jun 2022
 

Abstract

Introduction

Noninvasive ventilation is a well-established treatment for acute respiratory failure, being increasingly applied in the prehospital setting. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate whether early prehospital initiation of noninvasive ventilation reduces mortality compared to standard oxygen therapy.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to February 7th, 2022, for studies comparing prehospital noninvasive ventilation performed by emergency medical services versus standard oxygen therapy in patients with acute respiratory failure. The primary outcome was mortality at the longest follow-up available.

Results

We included ten randomized studies and two quasi-randomized studies for a total of 1485 patients. Prehospital treatment with noninvasive ventilation compared with standard oxygen therapy did not significantly reduce mortality at the longest follow-up available (107/810 [13%] vs 114/772 [15%]; RR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.70–1.13; P = 0.34; I2=24%). The endotracheal intubation rate was reduced when receiving prehospital noninvasive ventilation (38/776 [4.9%] vs 81/743 [11%]; RR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31–0.63; P < 0.001; I2=0%; number needed to treat 17). The intensive care admission rate (114/532 [21%] vs 129/507 [25%]; RR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.69–1.04; P = 0.11; I2=0%) and length of hospital stay (mean difference=-1.29 days; 95% CI, −3.35–0.77; P = 0.21; I2=82%) were similar between groups.

Conclusions

Adults with acute respiratory failure treated in the prehospital setting with noninvasive ventilation had a lower risk of intubation than those managed with standard oxygen therapy, with similar risk of death, intensive care admission, and length of hospital stay.

Review registration

PROSPERO CRD42021284947

Disclosure Statement

F.C., G.L., and A.Z. have applied for a patent on NIV. The other authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Availability of Data, Code, and Other Materials

Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors Contributions

Design of the study: Scquizzato T, Imbriaco G, Moro F, Losiggio R, Cabrini L, Consolo F, Landoni G, Zangrillo A

Data collection: Scquizzato T, Imbriaco G, Moro F, Losiggio R

Statistical analysis: Scquizzato T, Landoni G

Manuscript draft and critical review: Scquizzato T, Imbriaco G, Moro F, Losiggio R, Cabrini L, Consolo F, Landoni G, Zangrillo A

Administrative support: Landoni G, Zangrillo A

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 85.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.