1,018
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Norwegian occupational wholeness questionnaire (N-OWQ): Scale development and psychometric properties

&
Pages 4-13 | Received 06 Mar 2017, Accepted 09 Jan 2018, Published online: 12 Jan 2018
 

Abstract

Background: Occupational therapy has long emphasized the concepts doing, being, becoming and belonging, and a notion of balance between them. Measures of these concepts are in a developing stage.

Aim: This study aimed to develop and examine the properties of the Norwegian version of the Occupational Wholeness Questionnaire (N-OWQ), which is proposed to measure being, becoming, and belonging, in addition to occupational wholeness as a higher-order concept.

Methods: An anonymous sample of 248 persons over the age of 18 years completed the N-OWQ along with sociodemographic information. Principal Components Analysis (PCA) was performed on the scale items when examining factor structure. Item reduction was based on considerations of communalities, factor loadings, scale consistency if item deleted, and conceptual issues. Internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach’s α.

Results: Following the PCA, the ‘Being’ and ‘Becoming’ scales merged into one five-item ‘Self’ scale (Cronbach’s α 0.77). The ‘Belonging’ scale items were split into two scales comprised by three items each: ‘Closeness’ (Cronbach’s α 0.70) and ‘Relatedness’ (Cronbach’s α 0.73).

Conclusions: The revised N-OWQ merged the ‘Being’ and ‘Becoming’ items into one factor, whereas the ‘Belonging’ items were split into two distinct factors. Internal consistency for all scales were satisfactory.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the responses from all the participants. We are also grateful for the efforts contributed by the Norwegian review panel: Thea Moos Opseth, Mikkel Magnus Thørrisen, Ingunn Myraunet, Brian Ellingham, and Ratna Anand Hussain, and for Karoline Ekse Jenssen’s efforts in disseminating the link to the online questionnaire via various social media channels.

Disclosure statement

The authors have no competing interests.

Funding

The study received no funding from any source.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.