HCR-20 Risk Profiles of Patients Referred to Forensic Mental Health Services in New South Wales

Abstract

The present study aimed to consider the HCR-20 risk profiles of forensic and civil (i.e. general psychiatric) patients referred to forensic mental health services (FMHS), in the state of New South Wales (NSW), Australia. It was hoped that by better understanding patient risk, based on HCR-20 ratings, more could be understood about the differing needs of the two patient groups.

Data gathered from comprehensive assessments undertaken by trained clinicians across two service settings, a medium secure forensic facility and the NSW Community Forensic Mental Health Service (CFMHS) was utilised. Data from 129 forensic patients and 105 civil patients were included. T-tests indicated significant differences between means of civil and forensic patients on the HCR-20 and odds ratios (ORs) indicated civil patients referred to FMHS were approximately six times more likely to fall into the high-risk category on the HCR-20 (i.e. score 25 or >) than forensic patients.

The nature and level of risk evident between forensic and civil patients referred to FMHS in NSW highlighted two issues: (1) The differing risk/need inherent in two patient groups accessing FMHS; and (2) The level of risk observed in civil patients referred to FMHS and therein the challenges faced by generalist mental health services in managing this patient group. The need for generalist mental health services to be better supported and the need for structured, evidence-based risk management practice to be extended to civil psychiatric patient care was indicated.

Key words:

• forensic mental health
• HCR-20
• risk
• violence