ABSTRACT
Introduction: Agitation is common and distressing in patients with Alzheimer-type dementia, but safe, effective treatments remain elusive. Psychological treatments are first-line options, but they have limited efficacy. Off-label psychotropic medications are frequently used, but they also have limited effectiveness, and their use may have harmful side effects, including death.
Areas covered: This review discusses the history leading to the conception of AVP-786 (deuterated (d6)-dextromethorphan/quinidine), its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles and safety issues, together with an overview of recent clinical trials. Data were found in the medical literature, in US and EU clinical trial registries and in information provided by the manufacturer.
Expert opinion: AVP-786 is one of six investigational compounds in recent phase III clinical development for agitation in Alzheimer disease (AD). Quinidine and deuteration appear to prolong dextromethorphan’s plasma half-life and facilitate brain penetration. The FDA granted fast-track designation to AVP-786 and allowed use of data generated on dextromethorphan-quinidine (AVP-923, Nuedexta®) for regulatory filings. AVP-923 reduced agitation in AD and was well tolerated in a phase II RCT that included more than 200 patients. A phase III clinical development program of AVP-786 for AD agitation was recently initiated. This program is expected to start generating results in July 2018.
Declaration of interest
R. Garay is President of Craven (Villemoisson-sur-Orge, France) a non-profit association for therapeutic innovation. G. Grossberg declares consultancy for Accera, Avanir, Forest/Actavis/Allergan, GE, Genentech, Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis, Otsuka, Roche and Takeda. G. Grossberg also receives research report from Accera, Forest and Noven and was a member of the Safety Monitoring Committees for EryDel, Merck and Newron. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.