326
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Assessing fear of childbirth and its predictors among Hungarian pregnant women using Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire subscales

, , , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 879-889 | Received 11 Apr 2018, Accepted 06 Jan 2019, Published online: 29 Jan 2019
 

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to assess fear of childbirth (FOB) among Hungarian pregnant women and determine predictors based on WDEQ-A subscales. This cross-sectional study was conducted among 423 healthy pregnant women during their third trimester. A socio-demographic and obstetrics characteristics, the Hungarian version of WDEQ-A, Beck Depression Inventory-Short Form and Beck Anxiety Inventory were used. The analysis was performed using multivariate linear regression. Among four WDEQ-A subscales, Fear (19%) and Lack of positive emotion (13%) obtained the largest and smallest percentages of cases with severe FOB. The nulliparous obtained significantly higher mean score in subscales Isolation and Lack of positive emotion compared to the multiparous. Anxiety was the most common predictor for all subscales in both groups. In the nulliparous group, significant predictors included economic hardship for Moment of birth, being a housewife for Fear, and wanted pregnancy for Lack of positive emotion. In the multiparous women, the strongest significant predictors were being married, previous elective caesarean section and being a housewife for subscales Isolation, Moment of birth, and Fear, respectively. Assessing FOB using WDEQ-A among Hungarian women revealed different mean scores and predisposing factors for each subscale. The topic should be further explored relative to its constituent factors.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate all pregnant women who agreed to participate in this study and especially midwives working at the NST laboratory for their great cooperation. This work was supported by EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00009 “Development of scientific workshops of medical, health sciences and pharmaceutical educations”.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00009 “Development of scientific workshops of medical, health sciences and pharmaceutical educations”.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 402.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.