Publication Cover
Laterality
Asymmetries of Brain, Behaviour, and Cognition
Volume 24, 2019 - Issue 4
635
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Brain asymmetry in directing attention during dichotic listening test: An fNIRS study

, , , ORCID Icon, &
Pages 377-392 | Received 11 May 2018, Accepted 19 Sep 2018, Published online: 27 Sep 2018
 

ABSTRACT

In a classical dichotic listening paradigm, besides auditory brain asymmetry, cognitive functions such as attention and conflict resolution play a major role. The aim of this study is to reveal the possible haemodynamic mechanisms of higher attentional performance in prefrontal cortex during dichotic listening test. Twenty-six healthy participants underwent a dichotic listening task in three sessions; non-forced attention, attention focused to right ear, and attention focused to left ear. In each session, haemodynamic activity of prefrontal brain area was recorded using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Effects of focused attention and performance level of the task on oxy-, deoxy-, and total haemoglobin levels were investigated. Oxy- and total haemoglobin levels in right prefrontal regions during forced-right and forced-left sessions were significantly higher than levels of the non-forced session. This might be an indicator of inhibition and orienting attentional functions of right inferior frontal gyrus. High performers had significantly higher deoxyhaemoglobin levels in the forced-left session compared to the non-forced session, while low performers’ deoxyhaemoglobin levels did not differ among these sessions. Observing this difference only in the forced-left session but not in the forced-right session might suggest conflict resolution in top-down and bottom-up processes during the forced-left session for right-handed participants.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ugras Erdogan for his support in experimental design on MatLab. This research did not receive any specific grant from the funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 304.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.