911
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Evaluating the Cornell scale for depression in dementia as a proxy measure in nursing home residents with and without dementia

, , &
Pages 892-901 | Received 30 Nov 2011, Accepted 12 Feb 2012, Published online: 10 Apr 2012
 

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the use of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) as a proxy measure. Study questions were: How do residents’ self-reports on the CSDD compare with the nurse proxy CSDD ratings of the resident? How do characteristics of depression as rated by the resident CSDD and the nurse CSDD compare? To what extent are demographic and clinical variables associated with resident CSDD, nurse CSDD, and the discrepancy between resident and nurse CSDD scores?

Methods: Residents and nurse proxy pairs (n = 395 pairs) from 28 nursing homes (NHs) participated. We calculated discrepancy scores for total and subscale CSDD scores, examined correlations between resident and nurse CSDD scores, and described rates of clinical depression using each of the scores. We conducted multivariate analyses to examine factors associated with resident and nurse CSDD and discrepancy scores.

Results: On average, participants had mild cognitive impairment, were White, and female. Associations between resident and nurse CSDD were low (r = 0.16). The mean discrepancy score was −2.03 (SD = 5.28, p < 0.001), indicating that nurses evaluated residents as less depressed than residents evaluated themselves. Discrepancy scores were not associated with residents’ cognitive status, but were associated with a measure of self-report reliability. Regression analyses indicated that depression diagnosis accounted for a small but significant association with resident CSDD, but was not significantly associated with nurse CSDD.

Conclusion: These findings underscore the importance of obtaining resident input when assessing depression in NH residents with dementia, and educating NH nurses in the most effective ways to assess depression.

Acknowledgments

The authors want to thank Julie Cleveland, Linda Song and Nathan Hansen for collecting the data.

This study was supported by Award Number R01NR009100 from the National Institute of Nursing Research. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Nursing Research or the National Institutes of Health.

Disclosure: The authors have reported no conflict of interest.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 688.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.