497
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Cognitive process scores associated with self-reported behavioral dysfunction on the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe) in chronic traumatic brain injury

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 90-100 | Received 21 Feb 2019, Accepted 16 Sep 2019, Published online: 10 Oct 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) often experience long-term cognitive impairment that affects daily functioning, but neuropsychological tests are often not associated with functional outcomes in chronic TBI. To identify better neuropsychological test predictors of functional outcomes, we identified process-oriented neuropsychological test scores associated with behavioral dysfunction in chronic TBI.

Method: Adults (N = 65, age = 49.9 years, education = 14.6 years, 80% male, 97% white) with a > 6-month (median = 55 months) history of TBI (31% complicated mild, 20% moderate, 49% severe) completed the self-reported Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe) and a battery of neuropsychological tests. Cognitive scores significantly associated with FrSBe domain scores (Apathy, Disinhibition, Executive Dysfunction) were included in hierarchical linear regression analyses.

Results: Pearson correlations were significant (|r| = .25 – .41, p < .05) between FrSBe Disinhibition and Executive Dysfunction domains and numerous cognitive scores, particularly cognitive process scores, including California Verbal Learning Test II (CVLT-II) and Letter (FAS) Fluency Intrusions and Repetitions. In the regression analyses, gender, injury severity, premorbid intelligence, time since injury, self-awareness, and depression status accounted for less than 1% (Disinhibition) and 6.1% (Executive Dysfunction) of the total adjusted variance in respective FrSBe domains. Cognitive process scores were the strongest factors associated with behavioral dysfunction, explaining an additional 22.9% of the total adjusted variance in Disinhibition [F(3, 50) = 6.28, p = .001]. For Executive Dysfunction, traditional scores explained 2.6% added variance on top of the base model, with cognitive process scores explaining an additional 17.2% [F(4, 48) = 6.79, p = .003] of the total adjusted variance.

Conclusions: Less frequently utilized cognitive process scores from well-known neuropsychological tests may be better predictors of behavioral dysfunction in chronic TBI, as measured by the FrSBe. Future prospective study is required to validate these findings and test the sensitivity and specificity of these cognitive process scores for identifying risk for behavioral dysfunction.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported in part through funding received from the School of Health and Rehabilitation Science Research Development Fund, School of Health of Rehabilitation Science, University of Pittsburgh (SJ).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 627.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.