6,748
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Clinical practice guidance for juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) 2018-Update

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 411-423 | Received 01 Nov 2018, Accepted 03 Jan 2020, Published online: 03 Feb 2020

Abstract

Juvenile dermatomyositis is the most common type of juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathy mainly affecting the skin and proximal muscles. We have published the Japanese version of ‘Clinical practice guidance for juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) 2018 ‘consisting of a review of articles in the field and evidence-informed consensus-based experts’ opinion on the treatment strategy in collaboration with The Pediatric Rheumatology Association of Japan and The Japan College of Rheumatology under the financial support by ‘Research on rare and intractable diseases, Health and Labor Sciences Research Grants’. This article is a digest version of the Japanese guidance.

View correction statement:
Correction

1. Introduction

Juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathy is an umbrella entity comprising juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), juvenile polymyositis (JPM), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), inclusion body myositis (IBM), and connective tissue disease-associated myositis, which develops before the age of 18 [Citation1]. JDM is the most common form of juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (JIIMs) currently affecting 1.7 per 100,000 children in Japan [Citation2]. Recently, Single Hub and Access point for pediatric Rheumatology in Europe (SHARE) has published consensus-based recommendation for the management of JDM [Citation3]. However, there are several differences in the frequency of complications and drug use between Europe or United States and Japan such as the frequency of anti-melanoma differentiation-association gene 5 (MDA5) antibody-positive rapidly progressive (RP)-interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the available route of methotrexate (MTX) administration, respectively [Citation4–6]. These facts prompted us to develop clinical practice guidance for JDM suitable for patients in Japan. The Scientific Research Group for Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases (SRGPRD) was organized to standardize the diagnosis, evaluation of severity, and management of pediatric rheumatic diseases under the support by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. The JDM Research Group of SRGPRD consisting of 13 pediatric rheumatologists, a dermatologist and a pathologist has published the Japanese version of the guidance in collaboration with The Pediatric Rheumatology Association of Japan (PRAJ) and The Japan College of Rheumatology (JCR). Because evidence on the management of JDM is limited, this guidance mainly consists of narrative review of articles in the field and evidence-informed consensus-based experts’ opinion on the treatment strategy. Articles were searched for the consensus-based part in MEDLINE and PubMed in 2017. Articles after the publication of the original Japanese version were hand-searched. Each section was reviewed and approved by all the JDM research group member. Final version of the manuscript was confirmed after public comments and approved by the steering committee of both PRAJ and JCR. The present English version summarizes the Japanese version with an update consisting of several recently published articles.

2. Definition

JDM is a symmetrical inflammatory myositis predominantly affecting proximal muscles with characteristic skin lesions [Citation7]. However, some cases lack muscle weakness despite skin lesions characteristic of JDM and this is currently called juvenile clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis (JCADM) [Citation8]. JCADM comprises juvenile amyopathic dermatomyositis (JADM) and juvenile hypomyopathic dermatomyositis (JHDM). JHDM is defined as cases lacking clinical muscle weakness despite clinicopathologically confirmed classical cutaneous manifestations of JDM and the presence of myositis on laboratory, electrophysiological and/or radiological examinations. JADM patients have no clinical or laboratory evidence of myositis despite clinicopathologically confirmed skin lesions typical of JDM. Gerami et al. originally defined JCADM as cases fulfilling the above conditions for 6 months after onset without systemic treatment [Citation8]. However, early commencement of systemic glucocorticosteroid (GC) and immunosuppressants is often required in the clinical setting. Thus, these terms may be applied to patients who lack obvious muscle weakness despite typical skin rashes regardless of disease duration before initiating systemic treatment.

3. Etiology and pathophysiology

Although the pathogenesis of JDM is not fully clarified, involvement of both genetic and environmental factors has been suggested. In addition to the relationship with human leukocyte antigens (HLA), JDM-related polymorphisms are reported in the genes encoding TNF-α promotor, interleukin-1β, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist intron, interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5), mannose-binding lectin (MBL), chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 21 (CCL21), phospholipase C-like protein a (PLCL1) and B lymphoid kinase (BLK) [Citation5,Citation9–11]. Reported environmental factors include infectious agents such as coxsackievirus, influenza virus, parvovirus, hepatitis B virus, group A streptococcus, toxoplasma, and borrelia, as well as vaccines, ultraviolet exposure, and medications [Citation5].

Histopathological studies have revealed ischemic change due to inflammatory or non-inflammatory systemic vasculopathy, and both apoptosis of the muscle cells and amplification of inflammation mediated by type-I interferon (IFN) in JDM [Citation1,Citation5,Citation12]. Pathological roles of macrophages, T cells, plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), and autoantibodies have been suggested in the development of inflammatory myositis.

4. Diagnosis

Diagnosis of JDM is not difficult for experienced physicians when presented with a typical rash but is often delayed in general clinical settings because of its rarity and the difficulty of objective assessment of muscle weakness in young children. JDM can be misdiagnosed as developmental disorders or muscular dystrophy, which often results in delayed treatment ().

Table 1. Currently used ‘guidance for diagnosis in research project of specified pediatric chronic diseases’.

Diagnostic criteria proposed by Bohan and Peter [Citation7] described the disease but do not include modern diagnostic methods. The classification criteria for PM/DM by the Japanese Ministry of Labor, Health and Welfare (1992) had been applied to pediatric cases but had the following problems [Citation13]. First, electromyography is painful and scarcely used for the diagnosis of JDM particularly in young children. Second, the criteria cannot be used for the diagnosis of JADM. On the other hand, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful for the detection of muscle lesions and is widely available in Japan. Recently established ‘the Guidance for Diagnosis in Research Project of Specified Pediatric Chronic diseases’ has been developed by modification of the previous criteria, which include both MRI and myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) instead of electromyography and anti-Jo-1 antibodies, respectively. The criteria are used for both epidemiological surveys and financial support by action for intractable disease, and specific chronic diseases in childhood (http://www.shouman.jp/instructions/6_1_3/). There are several differences between the criteria for JDM and the current criteria for adult DM/PM; neither MRI nor MSAs are included in the criteria for adult DM, whereas Gottron’s sign and Gottron’s papules were not separated in the criteria for JDM. Recently developed ACR/EULAR classification criteria for IIM [Citation14] are also specific and sensitive in Japanese patients with JIIM (unpublished) and may be applied in Japan in the near-future.

5. Skin lesions

Heliotrope rash, Gottron’s papules, and Gottron’s sign are pathognomonic and tend to associate with disease activity, although Gottron’s sign may persist after achieving remission. The color of the heliotrope rash is rather dark reddish than purple in Japanese patients compared with Caucasians. Butterfly erythema which spreads over the cheeks on both sides of the root of the nose and often over the entire face is frequently an initial dermatological symptom of JDM. Inverse Gottron’s papules are frequently observed in adult patients with DM complicated with RP-ILD, whereas the correlation is not evident in JDM [Citation15]. Periungual erythema is not specific but often observed as an initial symptom of JDM [Citation16]. Elongation of the nail epithelium and dilated nail-fold capillaries are characteristic to both (J)DM and scleroderma. Poikiloderma is an intermix of pigmentation, depigmentation, dilatation of capillary vessels and skin atrophy in the same area, indicating chronic disease. Calcinosis is a characteristic cutaneous sign in JDM compared with DM [Citation17]. Undermining ulcer is a possibly vasculitis-associated ulcerative lesion expanding from the dermis into subcutaneous tissues and associated with anti-MDA5 autoantibodies.

Other dermatological symptoms include V-sign, holster sign, and shawl sign; these are dark reddish purple-colored erythema on the upper chest, buttock to the outside of the thigh, and bilateral shoulders, respectively. Mechanic’s hands are associated with anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (ARS) antibodies in DM, but these skin signs are rare in patients with JDM [Citation18,Citation19].

6. Myopathy

Symmetrical muscle weakness, predominantly proximal, is a major sign of JDM. Functional disability varies from a mild one (e.g. stumbling) to a severe one such as difficulty in rolling over, standing up from lying, or maintaining a sitting position. Involvement of the laryngopharynx muscles causes dysphagia, aspiration, and dysphonia. Weakness often progresses gradually and insidiously [Citation1,Citation5,Citation7]. Deep tendon reflexes are preserved despite apparent muscle atrophy.

7. Laboratory examination

All patients with suspected JDM should be assessed by laboratory tests focusing on the differential diagnosis and assessment of both myositis and vascular endothelial damage in addition to routine hematological, biochemical and immunological investigations (). Although measurement of muscle-derived enzymes is useful for the diagnosis and the assessment of disease activity of myositis, the results should be carefully interpreted particularly in the cases with liver dysfunction [Citation20–25]. Von Willebrand factor and fibrin degradation product reflect activation and damage of vascular endothelial cells [Citation26–28]. Serum levels of ferritin, neopterin and soluble interleukin-2 receptor also correlate with disease activity but are not specific to JDM [Citation29–33]. Myositis-specific antibodies are mentioned in the next section. Once the diagnosis of JDM is made, complications such as interstitial lung disease should be serially assessed [Citation34].

Table 2. Laboratory tests.

8. Myositis-specific autoantibodies

Although recent reports have demonstrated association of clinical features with MSAs, there are several differences in clinical features between races or age groups even with the same antibody. In the US and European cohorts, autoantibodies are identified in about 70% of patients with JDM, and many of them showed positive response for anti-transcriptional intermediary factor-1ɣ (TIF-1ɣ) or anti-MJ/nuclear matrix protein (NXP) 2 antibodies [Citation4,Citation5,Citation23]. After the Japanese version of the guidance had been published, two Japanese groups have reported the frequency of MSAs [Citation6,Citation35]. Both reports show higher frequencies of anti-MDA5 antibodies (20-30%) than those in the UK registry (7.4%) [Citation4]. The presence of anti-Mi-2, anti-signal recognition particle (SRP), and anti-ARS antibodies are quite rare in JIIMs [Citation4–6,Citation23]. Anti-MDA5 antibodies are related to ILD and arthritis but not necessarily to JCADM [Citation6,Citation30]. This is in contrast to JDM in Western countries where the complication of ILD is rare and to adult DM in Japan where the antibody is related to clinically amyopathic cases [Citation4,Citation5,Citation23,Citation36–40]. Anti-TIF-1ɣ antibodies are, similar to JDM patients in Western countries, associated with a chronic course, typical rashes and mild myositis [Citation4–6,Citation35,Citation41]. However, in contrast to adult DM, there is no association of the autoantibody with malignancies in JDM [Citation4–6,Citation23,Citation41,Citation42]. Anti-MJ/NXP2 antibodies are associated with severe muscle weakness and calcinosis [Citation43,Citation44]. Both anti-SRP and anti-HMGCR antibodies are very rare but associated with JIMNM in both Japan and Western countries [Citation4–6]. Anti-small ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme (SAE) antibodies are positive in 8% of DM patients in the USA and Europe and 2% in Asian countries but are quite rare in JDM [Citation4–6].

9. Imaging

MRI is widely available in Japan and easy for children because of its non-invasiveness [Citation20,Citation45]. Acute phase inflammatory edema of the muscles is reflected by high intensity signal on fat suppression/T2-weighted image or short tau inversion recovery (STIR) image with a high sensitivity, although these findings are not specific to myositis [Citation20,Citation45–47]. Similar findings in the fascia and subcutaneous tissues can be seen in an early phase of severe myositis and can be associated with the development of lipodystrophy [Citation48,Citation49]. MRI is also used for the assessment of disease progression, prediction of severity, and decision of site of muscle biopsy [Citation50–53].

10. Muscle pathology

Muscle tissues are usually biopsied from biceps brachii or rectus femoris muscle but may be taken from other involved muscles. Fresh freeze fixation using isopentane/liquid nitrogen technique and, if possible, glutaraldehyde fixation is recommended for histochemistry/immunohistochemistry and electron microscopic studies, respectively [Citation54]. Biopsy and tissue fixation should be performed by an experienced physician.

Perifascicular atrophy and microinfarction are specific to (J)DM [Citation55]. The other JDM-specific findings include expression of type I interferon-induced molecules such as myxoma resistance protein (MxA), and deposition of membrane attack complex (MAC) associated with or without immunoglobulin on immunohistochemical studies [Citation56,Citation57]. Tubulointerstitial inclusions are found in endothelium on electron microscopy [Citation58]. Variability in muscle fiber size, necrotic and regenerating fibers and infiltration of inflammatory cells around perivascular and perimysial regions are observed in a large number of patients but are not specific to (J)DM [Citation7,Citation55]. Fibrosis of endomysium is often observed. Infiltrating cells are mainly CD4-positive cells, B cells, macrophages and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) [Citation59,Citation60]. CD4+CD123+ CD11+ pDCs account for approximately a half of CD4+ cells [Citation61].

In contrast to JDM, infiltration of lymphocytes into endomysium, surrounding non-necrotic fibers and invasion into non-necrotic fibers are seen in patients with PM. Infiltrating cells are mainly CD8-positive T cells [Citation59,Citation60]. MHC-class I molecules are expressed on the muscle fibers. In IMNM, fiber size variability, necrosis, and regeneration of muscle fibers are observed. Cellular infiltration is absent or mild [Citation62].

Muscle biopsy from anti-ARS syndrome shows necrotizing and regenerating fibers in the perifascicular region but lack expression of MxA in the fibers [Citation63]. Thus, the syndrome is pathogenetically distinct from (J)DM.

11. Electrophysiological examination

Electromyography (EMG) is a useful examination for differential diagnosis of muscular diseases even in the cases without abnormal findings on MRI. The biceps brachii muscle or quadriceps muscles are usually used for the examination. Myositis is suggested by the following observations; increased insertional activity at time of needle insertion, fibrillations and positive sharp waves at resting condition, and decreased amplitude and short duration of motor unit potential by voluntary movement [Citation64]. It is noted that the findings can vary by insertion site, disease stage, and treatments. EMG examination should be assessed by experts in neuro-muscular disorders.

12. Assessment of severity

Although Gowers’ test and Trendelenburg test are simple methods to detect weakness, all patients should be assessed for muscle weakness by validated methods such as manual muscle testing (MMT)-8 or Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale (CMAS) [Citation65–67]. However, younger children tend to have a lower total score and are more difficult to assess. [Citation68]. Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) is used for the assessment of functional ability [Citation65]. These assessment methods, together with various indices related to disease activity, myopathy, and patient-reported outcomes, are included in the Myositis Core Set Measures established by the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Study Group (IMACS) [Citation69] and core set of measures for disease activity in JDM proposed by Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO) [Citation70]. Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) is used for assessment of overall disease activity including both muscular and extramuscular diseases [Citation71]. These were proposed for clinical trials but not for routine clinical practice.

PRINTO has defined inactive disease in JDM as fulfillment of three of four criteria: (1) serum CK activity ≤150 IU/L, (2) CMAS ≥48, (3) MMT score ≥78 and (4) physician global assessment (PGA) score of overall disease activity ≤0.2 [Citation72]. A large cohort study from United Kingdom has suggested to incorporate PGA score of overall disease activity as an essential criterion, because skin disease is underestimated by the PRINTO criteria [Citation73].

13. Differential diagnoses

Diagnosis of JDM is often difficult in cases without characteristic rashes or typical symptoms such as muscle weakness of proximal muscles and muscle pain. Measurement of MSA, electromyography, and muscle biopsy may be helpful in such cases [Citation74]. Differential diagnosis includes muscular dystrophy, metabolic myopathy (glycogen storage disease type II and V, carnitine cycle disorders, and mitochondrial diseases), and endocrine disease (hypo- and hyper-thyroidism, hypo- and hyper-calcemia, and hypokalemia), other immunological diseases (X-linked agammaglobulinemia, Nakajo–Nishimura syndrome, and mixed connective tissue disease), and infectious myositis [Citation75–79].

14. Treatment

14.1. Principle of treatment

All patients with suspected JDM should be referred to pediatric rheumatologists. Early and aggressive therapy is recommended to reduce inflammation, because prolonged disease activity is associated with increased morbidity such as calcinosis.

Glucocorticosteroid (GC) therapy has reduced the mortality of JDM and is still a mainstay of treatment [Citation80]. Early and aggressive treatment with high-dose GC in combination with MTX or other immunosuppressants may reduce calcinosis and is particularly recommended for severe/fulminant cases and cases with ILD [Citation81–86]. These immunosuppressive drugs have additive and/or steroid-sparing effect and are recommended even in mild cases to minimize adverse effects of long-term GC therapy such as growth failure, obesity, osteoporosis and cataract [Citation87–89]. On the basis of evidence-informed consensus-based experts’ opinion, we propose a treatment algorithm that conforms to the present status in Japan ().

Figure 1. Algorithm of treatment for JDM. ADM: amyopathic dermatomyositis; AZA: azathioprine; CNI: calcineurin inhibitor; GC: glucocorticoid; HRCT: high-resolution computed tomography; ILD: interstitial lung disease; IVCYC: intravenous cyclophosphamide; IVIG: intravenous immunoglobulin; MMF: mycophenolate mofetil; mPSL: methylprednisolone; PE: plasma exchange; RTX: rituximab.

Figure 1. Algorithm of treatment for JDM. ADM: amyopathic dermatomyositis; AZA: azathioprine; CNI: calcineurin inhibitor; GC: glucocorticoid; HRCT: high-resolution computed tomography; ILD: interstitial lung disease; IVCYC: intravenous cyclophosphamide; IVIG: intravenous immunoglobulin; MMF: mycophenolate mofetil; mPSL: methylprednisolone; PE: plasma exchange; RTX: rituximab.

At diagnosis of JDM all patients should be screened for complication of ILD by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan of the chest and biomarkers such as serum levels of Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) [Citation34]. Patients with dysphagia, dyspnea, skin ulcer, generalized edema or gastrointestinal bleeding are classified as severe or fulminant cases. The other cases are classified as mild/moderate.

Before starting therapy, screening for infection should be performed. This should include hepatitis B virus (HBs antigens, anti-HBs antibodies, and anti-HBc antibodies), hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV antibodies), mycobacterium tuberculosis (tuberculosis-specific interferon-gamma release assay), fungus (β-D-glucan), Epstein–Barr virus, and cytomegalovirus. Vaccination to measles, rubella, and varicella may be indicated in non-immune patients if possible. Vaccination before and during treatment should adhere to the recommendations for vaccination in pediatric rheumatic diseases by PRAJ [Citation90]. Non-pharmacological management includes physiotherapy and avoidance of ultraviolet exposure using sunscreen (SPF 30 or higher).

14.2. Induction therapy

In JADM, topical GC and/or tacrolimus (TAC) is indicated, although systemic use of GC in combination with weekly MTX may be used in refractory cases [Citation3,Citation91,Citation92].

Mild/moderate JDM including JHDM needs high-dose oral GC or methylprednisolone (mPSL) pulse therapy as an induction therapy [Citation82–89], although the efficacy of lower dose of GC is reported [Citation93]. Japanese pediatric rheumatologists tend to start with 1-3 courses of mPSL pulse therapy followed by oral PSL at 0.7–1.5 mg/kg/day. Weekly MTX is used as a concomitant medication [Citation87–89]. Although intramuscular MTX is recommended as first line treatment with GC as it has fewer side effects and similar effectiveness to cyclosporine A [Citation94], only oral administration of MTX is supported by National Health Insurance in Japan and often causes intolerance due to abdominal discomfort. Azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil or calcineurin inhibitors such as CyA and TAC can be used in patients who are intolerant or resistant to MTX [Citation94–102]. Because of nephrotoxicity, trough levels of CyA and TAC should be monitored (CyA 100–200 ng/ml and TAC 5–10 ng/ml in acute phase, and lower in a long-term use). High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy is recommended for refractory cases [Citation103–105]. In severe/fulminant JDM, mPSL pulse therapy in combination with intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCYC) therapy is recommended [Citation3,Citation106]. The efficacy of IVCYC has recently been confirmed by marginal structural modeling approach [Citation107]. Special attention should be paid to bone marrow suppression, hemorrhagic cystitis, and nausea. The period of treatment depends on the response in each case but should not exceed the cumulative dose related to infertility. Male appear to be more sensitive to infertility secondary to CYC than female. In malignancy, cumulative dose of CYC over 7.5 g/m2 is a risk factor for infertility in both sexes (http://www.j-sfp.org/public_patient/fertility_treatment.html), whereas 89% of male patients who received less than 4 g/m2 of CYC are normospermic [Citation108]. Although a randomized control study has failed to show short-term efficacy of rituximab (RTX), 83% of patients receiving RTX met the definition of improvement [Citation109]. Thus, RTX reduces disease activity allowing the dose of GC to be tapered, and should be considered in refractory cases [Citation109,Citation110]. The use of plasma exchange (PE) has not been established in JDM but may be considered in combination with immunosuppressive drugs for refractory cases such as anti-SRP antibody-positive IMNM [Citation111,Citation112].

14.3. Maintenance therapy

Following achievement of improvement with induction therapy, the dose of GC is gradually reduced. Empirically in cases with long term remission for 1–2 years on maintenance dose of PSL (0.15–0.2 mg/kg/day), PSL is slowly tapered out in Japan. However, steroid tapering plans over 1 year have recently been proposed by Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) and PRINTO, and may be applied to Japanese patients with JDM [Citation113,Citation114]. Withdrawal of MTX or immunosuppressive drugs is considered in patients who have been in steroid-free remission for at least 1 year.

If myopathy or skin lesions relapse, which can be accompanied by elevation of muscle-derived enzymes, sIL-2R or FDP, adherence to medication should be assessed. Escalation of GC dose or alteration of adjunctive immunosuppressants should be considered in cases of relapse.

14.4. Management of infectious diseases

JDM itself is a risk factor for infection. In addition to opportunistic infections due to immunosuppressive therapy, aspiration pneumonia and infection of calcinotic sites or skin ulcers are observed in JDM and often need antibiotic therapy [Citation115]. Although evidence is absent in JDM, prophylactic administration of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for pneumocystis jiroveci can be considered in cases taking a high dose GC or aggressive immunosuppressive therapy [Citation116].

14.5. Osteoporosis

Consensus has not been obtained on the treatment of osteoporosis in patients with JDM. Combination of vitamin D3 and calcium is used to minimize osteoporosis and prevent bone fracture, although it is not associated with full recovery of bone mass [Citation117–120]. Bisphosphonate is reported to be effective for osteoporosis in childhood connective diseases [Citation120]. However, bisphosphonate is currently not supported by National Health Insurance for children and is considered as off-label use for this age-group.

15. Special conditions in JDM

15.1. Interstitial lung diseases

ILD is a major cause of JDM-associated death in Japan. Although the incidence of ILD in JDM is not clear, a nationwide survey in Japan reported 13 deaths with JDM in 5 years, six of which were attributed to RP-ILD [Citation121]. Anti-MDA5 autoantibodies are positive in one-third of Japanese patients with JDM in Japan (seen more frequently than in Western countries) and related to both DM- and JDM-associated ILD [Citation4–6,Citation30,Citation35–39,Citation122,Citation123]. Particularly high titers of the autoantibody are associated with RP-ILD in children [Citation30,Citation36]. On the other hand, anti-ARS antibodies which are related to chronic and recurrent ILD in adult DM are quite rare in children [Citation4–6,Citation35].

ILD can develop at an early disease stage or with disease relapse and is initially often asymptomatic or presents with only a mild cough, ILD needs to be looked for in every patient with JDM particularly those with positive anti-MDA5 autoantibodies regardless of ILD-related symptoms [Citation27,Citation36,Citation99]. Screening of ILD includes high-resolution chest CT (HRCT) and serum levels of KL-6, SP-D, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and in older children pulmonary function tests and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity, all of which are also used for assessment of disease activity of ILD during therapy.

Differential diagnosis includes pneumonia caused by pneumocystis, cytomegalovirus, mycoplasma, chlamydia, mycobacterium tuberculosis, and mycoplasma. However, they often complicate JDM-associated ILD and need specific treatments such as antibiotics, antifungals or antiviral agents in addition to the treatment for ILD.

Poor prognosis is associated with consolidation and ground glass opacity in the lower lung field and multiple subpleural ground glass opacity on chest HRCT in adult DM [Citation124]. However, because RP-ILD may not be differentiated from chronic ILD by HRCT at an early phase [Citation30,Citation99], it is critical to start aggressive treatment as early as possible. Anti-MDA5 antibody-positive JDM-associated ILD is usually refractory to mPSL pulse therapy alone [Citation99], although there is no randomized control study on the efficacy of immunosuppressant. Based on the studies in adult DM and case series in JDM, we recommend the combination of mPSL pulse therapy with immunosuppressive drugs such as calcineurin inhibitor and/or IVCYC. CyA is usually started with 3–5 mg/kg/day and is adjusted to maintain the trough levels at 150–200 ng/ml for the treatment of ILD [Citation99]. To date, evidences of the efficacy of TAC in ILD are limited to adult cases [Citation125]. Combination therapy with mPSL pulse therapy, calcineurin inhibitor and IVCYC reduced the mortality of adult DM-associated RP-ILD [Citation126] and should be considered in patients with respiratory symptoms at diagnosis of JDM or refractory to the above-mentioned treatments. Efficacy of IVIG therapy, RTX, MMF, PE, and plasma purification therapy using polymyxin B has been reported in adult cases [Citation127–146].

After the commencement of therapy for ILD, disease activity of ILD should be serially assessed by the methods as described above. Serum levels of KL-6 may remain high even after improvement of HRCT findings and pulmonary function when treated with CyA [Citation99]. Sudden respiratory deterioration suggests pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum [Citation147]. In cases requiring artificial ventilation, high frequency oscillation (HFO) should be considered.

15.2. Calcinosis

Calcinosis is observed in 30–70% of patients with JDM and associated with prolonged disease activity due to delay in diagnosis or commencement of treatment, cardiac involvement, and anti-NXP2 autoantibodies [Citation17,Citation43,Citation83,Citation148]. Calcinosis usually develops 1 year or more after the onset of disease prevalently in the extremities [Citation149,Citation150]. Four distinct patterns of soft-tissue calcification have been described; deep calcareal masses, superficial calcareal masses, deep linear deposits, and a lacy, reticular, subcutaneous deposition of calcium encasing the torso [Citation151]. Calcinosis consists of hydroxyapatite and various calcium salts and contains inflammatory cells such as macrophages and proinflammatory cytokines [Citation150,Citation152]. Plain X-ray is useful for the detection of calcinosis [Citation153]

Although case reports and case series have suggested efficacy of diltiazem, aluminum hydroxide, IVIG, thalidomide, probenecid, intralesional corticosteroid injection, bisphosphonates, infliximab, and abatacept, there is no definitive treatment of severe calcinosis [Citation154–164]. Surgical treatment is often necessary but should not be performed when disease is active [Citation165,Citation166].

15.3. Other complications

Thrombocytopenia with or without cytopenia of other lineages has been reported. Autoantibody formation, bone marrow suppression and hemophagocytosis have all been postulated as pathogenetic causes [Citation167]. Effectiveness of GC, immunosuppressants, and IVIG has been reported for these complications.

Although generalized edema complicates 6% of adult DM, the frequency is not known in JDM [Citation168]. Generalized edema is non-pitting and associated with severe muscle weakness, dysphagia, and skin or gastrointestinal ulcer [Citation168,Citation169]. Although the mechanism of generalized edema has not been clarified, vasculitis associated with hyperpermeability and microinfarction may be involved [Citation170]. Cases with generalized edema are usually resistant to oral monotherapy with PSL and require combination therapy of intravenous GC with immunosuppressant and/or IVIG [Citation168,Citation169].

Lipodystrophy is often accompanied by acanthosis nigricans and complicates 8–40% of JDM [Citation171–173]. Calcinosis, muscle atrophy, contracture of joints, butterfly rashes, and chronic disease course are risk factors for lipodystrophy [Citation173]. Lipodystrophy is accompanied by hypertriglyceridemia, insulin-resistance, nonalcoholic fatty liver, and decreased levels of HDL-cholesterol, and associated with anti-TIF-1γ autoantibodies [Citation41,Citation171–174]. In addition to the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia and insulin-resistant diabetes, the clinical effectiveness of metreleptin has been reported in 3 cases [Citation175].

Although the complication of arrhythmias or myocarditis/cardiomyopathy is rare [Citation176–179], recent studies have demonstrated subclinical cardiac dysfunction in late disease which is associated with sustained early skin disease rather than myopathy [Citation180,Citation181]. Accordingly, all patients with JDM should be tested for cardiac complications by echocardiogram and electrocardiogram. High-dose GC, mPSL pulse therapy and/or IVIG should be considered in cases with myocarditis/cardiomyopathy [Citation182].

Gastrointestinal ulcer or perforation reflects severe vasculopathy and require aggressive treatment with both mPSL pulse and IVCYC therapy, and in some cases, surgical therapy [Citation183–187].

Non-erosive arthritis develops in 40–60% of JDM patients and is often accompanied by synovitis which is similar to active JIA by imaging. The most frequently affected joint is reported to be the knee followed by wrists and finger joints [Citation148,Citation188]. The presence of anti-MDA5 autoantibodies is associated with arthritis [Citation4–6,Citation189]. Arthritis usually responds to standard treatment for JDM but can flare during reduction of GC.

Although membranous nephropathy and nephrotic syndrome were also reported in patients with JDM, complication of chronic kidney disease is very rare [Citation190–193]. Renal tubular necrosis due to myoglobinuria is rare but can be associated with severe myositis and dehydration [Citation194].

16. Prognosis

A 2010 international multicenter study reported a mortality rate of 3.1% and major functional impairment of 6.5% [Citation83]. Forty percent of the patients followed a monophasic course, whereas polyphasic course was observed in 60%. However, most of the patients with JDM finally achieve a drug-free remission [Citation6]. Major sequelae of JDM include muscle atrophy often accompanying joint contracture, subcutaneous calcinosis, and related functional impairment [Citation195].

Conflict of interest

Masaaki Mori: Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU) received unrestricted research grants for Department of Lifetime Clinical Immunology from AbbVie GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Corporation, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., CSL Behring K. K., Japan Blood Products Organization, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Towa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., with TMDU paid the salary of Masaaki Mori. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Funding

Research on rare and intractable diseases, Health and Labor Sciences Research Grants for ‘Study about the standardization of diagnostic criteria and disease severity classification and the development of evidence-based treatment guidelines for pediatric rheumatic diseases such as mainly juvenile idiopathic arthritis’ (H27-nanchitou(nan)-ippan-029).

References

  • Feldman BM, Rider LG, Reed AM, Pachman LM. Juvenile dermatomyositis and other idiopathic inflammatory myopathies of childhood. Lancet. 2008;371(9631):2201–12.
  • Fujikawa S, Okuni M. A nationwide surveillance study of rheumatic diseases among Japanese children. Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1997;39(2):242–4.
  • Enders FB, Bader-Meunier B, Baildam E, Constantin T, Dolezalova P, Feldman BM, et al. Consensus-based recommendations for the management of juvenile dermatomyositis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:329–40.
  • Tansley SL, Betteridge ZE, Gunawardena H, Jacques TS, Owens CM, Pilkington C, on behalf of UK Juvenile Dermatomyositis Research Group, et al. Anti-MDA5 autoantibodies in juvenile dermatomyositis identify a distinct clinical phenotype: a prospective cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16(4):R138–8.
  • Rider LG, Nistala K. The juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: pathogenesis, clinical and autoantibody phenotypes, and outcomes. J Intern Med. 2016;280(1):24–38.
  • Ueki M, Kobayashi I, Takezaki S, Tozawa Y, Okura Y, Yamada M, et al. Myositis-specific autoantibodies in Japanese patients with juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Mod Rheumatol. 2018;9:1–6.
  • Bohan A, Peter JB. Polymyositis and dermatomyositis. N Engl J Med. 1975;292(7):344–7.
  • Gerami P, Walling HW, Lewis J, Doughty L, Sontheimer RD. A systemic review of juvenile onset clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis. Br J Dermatol. 2007;157(4):637–44.
  • Chen S, Wang Q, Wu Z, Li Y, Li P, Sun F, et al. Genetic association study of TNFAIP3, IFIH1, IRF5 polymorphisms with polymyositis/dermatomyositis in Chinese Han population. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e110044.
  • Werth VP, Berlin JA, Callen JP, Mick R, Sullivan KE. Mannose binding lectin (MBL) polymorphisms associated with low MBL production in patients with dermatomyositis. J Invest Dermatol. 2002;119(6):1394–9.
  • Miller FW, Cooper RG, Vencovský J, Rider LG, Danko K, Wedderburn LR, with the Myositis Genetics Consortium, et al. Genome-wide association study of dermatomyositis reveals genetic overlap with other autoimmune disorders. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(12):3239–47.
  • Uruha A, Suzuki S, Nishino I. Diagnosis of dermatomyositis: autoantibody profile and muscle pathology. Clin Exp Neuroimmunol. 2017;8(4):302–12.
  • Tanimoto K, Nakano K, Kano S, Mori S, Ueki H, Nishitani H, et al. Classification criteria for polymyositis and dermatomyositis. J Rheumatol. 1995;22(4):668–74.
  • Lundberg IE, Tjärnlund A, Bottai M, Werth VP, Pilkington C, de Visser M, et al. 2017 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and their major subgroups. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(12):1955–64.
  • Quinter SD, Chiu YE, Lyon VB, Holland KE, Ruggeri SY, Drolet BA. Inverse Gottron’s papules: an unusual cutaneous manifestation of juvenile dermatomyositis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2012;29(5):641–4.
  • Peloro TM, Miller OF, Hahn TF, Newman ED. Juvenile dermatomyositis: a retrospective review of a 30-year experience. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45(1):28–34.
  • Saini I, Kalaivani M, Kabra SK. Calcinosis in juvenile dermatomyositis: frequency, risk factors and outcome. Rheumatol Int. 2016;36(7):961–5.
  • Stahl NI, Klippel JH, Decker JL. A cutaneous lesion associated with myositis. Ann Intern Med. 1979;91(4):577–9.
  • Yokoyama T, Shimizu M, Ishikawa S, Ueno K, Hamaguchi Y, Takehara K, et al. Accumulation of mature B cells in the inflamed muscle tissue of a patient with anti-155/140 antibody-positive juvenile dermatomyositis. Modern Rheumatol. 2013;23(1):167–71.
  • Brown VE, Pilkington CA, Feldman BM, Davidson JE. Network for Juvenile Dermatomyositis, Paediatric Rheumatology European Society (PReS). An international consensus survey of the diagnostic criteria for juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). Rheumatology. 2006;45(8):990–3.
  • Rider LG, Miller FW. Laboratory evaluation of the inflammatory myopathies. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1995;2(1):1–9.
  • Oddis CV, Medsger TA Jr. Relationship between serum creatine kinase level and corticosteroid therapy in polymyositis-dermatomyositis. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:807–11.
  • Shah M, Mamyrova G, Targoff IN, Huber AM, Malley JD, Rice MM, et al. The clinical phenotypes of the juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Medicine (Baltimore). 2013;92(1):25–41.
  • Kishi T, Miyamae T, Hara R, Nakajima S, Imagawa T, Mori M, et al. Clinical analysis of 50 children with juvenile dermatomyositis. Mod Rheumatol. 2013;23(2):311–7.
  • Sato JO, Sallum AM, Ferriani VP, Marini R, Sacchetti SB, Okuda EM, Rheumatology Committee of the São Paulo Paediatrics Society, et al. A Brazilian registry of juvenile dermatomyositis: onset features and classification of 189 cases. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009;27(6):1031–8.
  • Bowyer SL, Ragsdale CG, Sullivan DB. Factor VIII related antigen and childhood rheumatic diseases. J Rheumatol. 1989;16(8):1093–7.
  • Bloom BJ, Tucker LB, Miller LC, Schaller JG. von Willebrand factor in juvenile dermatomyositis. J Rheumatol. 1995;22(2):320–5.
  • Smith RL, Sundberg J, Shamiyah E, Dyer A, Pachman LM. Skin involvement in juvenile dermatomyositis is associated with loss of end row nailfold capillary loops. J Rheumatol. 2004;31(8):1644–9.
  • Rider LG, Lie L, Chipman J, Costello R, O’Hanlon T, Fleisher T, et al. Biomarkers of juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) aid in assessing disease activity over enzyme alone. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(Suppl, 10):1–40.
  • Kobayashi N, Takezaki S, Kobayashi I, Iwata N, Mori M, Nagai R, et al. Clinical and laboratory features of fatal rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease associated with juvenile dermatomyositis. Rheumatology. 2015;54(5):784–91.
  • De Benedetti F, De Amici M, Aramini L, Ruperto N, Martini A. Correlation of serum neopterin concentrations with disease activity in juvenile dermatomyositis. Arch Dis Child. 1993;69(2):232–5.
  • Rider LG, Schiffenbauer AS, Zito M, Lim KL, Ahmed A, Zemel LS, Juvenile Dermatomyositis Disease Activity Collaboration Study Group, et al. Neopterin and quinolinic acid are surrogate measures of disease activity in the juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Clin Chem. 2002;48(10):1681–8.
  • Kobayashi I, Ono S, Kawamura N, Okano M, Kobayashi K. Elevated serum levels of soluble interleukin-2 receptor in juvenile dermatomyositis. Pediatr Int. 2001;43(1):109–11.
  • Kobayashi I, Ono S, Kawamura N, Okano M, Miyazawa K, Shibuya H, et al. KL-6 is a potential marker for interstitial lung disease associated with juvenile dermatomyositis. J Pediatr. 2001;138(2):274–6.
  • Iwata N, Nakaseko H, Kohagura T, Yasuoka R, Abe N, Kawabe S, et al. Clinical subsets of juvenile dermatomyositis classified by myositis-specific autoantibodies: experience at a single center in Japan. Mod Rheumatol. 2018;10:1–15.
  • Kobayashi I, Okura Y, Yamada M, Kawamura N, Kuwana M, Ariga T. Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody is a diagnostic and predictive marker for interstitial lung diseases associated with juvenile dermatomyositis. J Pediatr. 2011;158(4):675–7.
  • Sato S, Hoshino K, Satoh T, Fujita T, Kawakami Y, Fujita T, et al. RNA helicase encoded by melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 is a major autoantigen in patients with clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis: association with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(7):2193–200.
  • Nakashima R, Imura Y, Kobayashi S, Yukawa N, Yoshifuji H, Nojima T, et al. The RIG-I-like receptor IFIH1/MDA5 is a dermatomyositis-specific autoantigen identified by the anti-CADM-140 antibody. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010;49(3):433–40.
  • Nakashima R, Hosono Y, Mimori T. Clinical significance and new detection system of autoantibodies in myositis with interstitial lung disease. Lupus. 2016;25(8):925–33.
  • Betteridge Z, McHugh N. Myositis-specific autoantibodies: an important tool to support diagnosis of myositis. J Intern Med. 2016;280(1):8–23.
  • Gunawardena H, Wedderburn LR, North J, Betteridge Z, Dunphy J, Chinoy H, for the Juvenile Dermatomyositis Research Group UK, et al. Clinical associations of autoantibodies to a p155/140 kDa doublet protein in juvenile dermatomyositis. Rheumatology. 2007;47(3):324–8.
  • Fujimoto M, Hamaguchi Y, Kaji K, Matsushita T, Ichimura Y, Kodera M, et al. Myositis-specific anti-155/140 autoantibodies target transcription intermediary factor 1 family proteins. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(2):513–22.
  • Tansley SL, Betteridge ZE, Shaddick G, Gunawardena H, Arnold K, Wedderburn LR, et al. Calcinosis in juvenile dermatomyositis is influenced by both anti-NXP2 autoantibody status and age at disease onset. Rheumatology. 2014;53(12):2204–8.
  • Gunawardena H, Wedderburn LR, Chinoy H, Betteridge ZE, North J, Ollier WE, Juvenile Dermatomyositis Research Group, UK and Ireland, et al. Autoantibodies to a 140-kd protein in juvenile dermatomyositis are associated with calcinosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(6):1807–14.
  • Hernandez RJ, Sullivan DB, Chenevert TL, Keim DR. MR imaging in children with dermatomyositis: musculoskeletal findings and correlation with clinical and laboratory findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;161(2):359–66.
  • Malattia C, Damasio MB, Madeo A, Pistorio A, Providenti A, Pederzoli S, et al. Whole-body MRI in the assessment of disease activity in juvenile dermatomyositis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(6):1083–90.
  • Summers RM, Brune AM, Choyke PL, Chow CK, Patronas NJ, Miller FW, et al. Juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: exercise-induced changes in muscle at short inversion time inversion-recovery imaging. Radiology. 1998;209(1):191–6.
  • Kimball AB, Summers RM, Turner M, Dugan EM, Hicks J, Miller FW, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging detection of occult skin and subcutaneous abnormalities in juvenile dermatomyositis. Implications for diagnosis and therapy. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(8):1866–73.
  • Sakurai N, Hino-Shishikura A, Nozawa T, Kamide H, Ohara A, Nishimura K, et al. Clinical significance of subcutaneous fat and fascial involvement in juvenile dermatomyositis. Mod Rheumatol. 2019;29(5):808–13.
  • Keim DR, Hernandez RJ, Sullivan DB. Serial magnetic resonance imaging in juvenile dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;34(12):1580–4.
  • Maillard SM, Jones R, Owens C, Pilkington C, Woo P, Wedderburn LR, et al. Quantitative assessment of MRI T2 relaxation time of thigh muscles in juvenile dermatomyositis. Rheumatology. 2004;43(5):603–8.
  • Davis WR, Halls JE, Offiah AC, Pilkington C, Owens CM, Rosendahl K. Assessment of active inflammation in juvenile dermatomyositis: a novel magnetic resonance imaging-based scoring system. Rheumatology. 2011;50(12):2237–44.
  • Van De Vlekkert J, Maas M, Hoogendijk JE, De Visser M, Van Schaik IN. Combining MRI and muscle biopsy improves diagnostic accuracy in subacute-onset idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. Muscle Nerve. 2015;51(2):253–8.
  • Wedderburn LR, Varsani H, Li CK, Newton KR, Amato AA, Banwell B, UK Juvenile Dermatomyositis Research Group, et al. International consensus on a proposed score system for muscle biopsy evaluation in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis: a tool for potential use in clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(7):1192–201.
  • Hoogendijk JE, Amato AA, Lecky BR, Choy EH, Lundberg IE, Rose MR, et al. 119th ENMC international workshop: trial design in adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, with the exception of inclusion body myositis, 10–12 October 2003, Naarden, The Netherlands. Neuromuscul Disord. 2004;14(5):337–45.
  • Uruha A, Nishikawa A, Tsuburaya RS, Hamanaka K, Kuwana M, Watanabe Y, et al. Sarcoplasmic MxA expression: a valuable marker of dermatomyositis. Neurology. 2017;88(5):493–500.
  • Whitaker JN, Engel WK. Vascular deposits of immunoglobulin and complement in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. N Engl J Med. 1972;286(7):333–8.
  • Lopez De Padilla CM, Vallejo AN, Lacomis D, McNallan K, Reed AM. Extranodal lymphoid microstructures in inflamed muscle and disease severity of new-onset juvenile dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:1160–72.
  • Arahata K, Engel AG. Monoclonal antibody analysis of mononuclear cells in myopathies. I: quantitation of subsets according to diagnosis and sites of accumulation and demonstration and counts of muscle fibers invaded by T cells. Ann Neurol. 1984;16(2):193–208.
  • Engel AG, Arahata K. Monoclonal antibody analysis of mononuclear cells in myopathies. II: phenotypes of autoinvasive cells in polymyositis and inclusion body myositis. Ann Neurol. 1984;16(2):209–15.
  • Lopez de Padilla CM, Vallejo AN, McNallan KT, Vehe R, Smith SA, Dietz AB, et al. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells in inflamed muscle of patients with juvenile dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:1658–68.
  • Basharat P, Christopher-Stine L. Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy: update on diagnosis and management. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2015;17(12):72.
  • Uruha A, Suzuki S, Suzuki N, Nishino I. Perifascicular necrosis in anti-synthetase syndrome beyond anti-Jo-1. Brain. 2016;139(9):e50.
  • Whittaker RG. The fundamentals of electromyography. Pract Neurol. 2012;12(3):187–94.
  • Rider LG, Werth VP, Huber AM, Alexanderson H, Rao AP, Ruperto N. Measures of adult and juvenile dermatomyositis, polymyositis, and inclusion body myositis: Physician and Patient/Parent Global Activity, Manual Muscle Testing (MMT), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)/Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (C-HAQ), Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale (CMAS), Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT), Disease Activity Score (DAS), Short Form 36 (SF-36), Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ), physician global damage, Myositis Damage Index (MDI), Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT), Myositis Functional Index-2 (FI-2), Myositis Activities Profile (MAP), Inclusion Body Myositis Functional Rating Scale (IBMFRS), Cutaneous Assessment Tool (CAT), Dermatomyosities Skin Severity Index (DSSI), Skindex, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(Suppl 1):S118–S57.
  • Rider LG, Koziol D, Giannini EH, Jain MS, Smith MR, Whitney-Mahoney K, et al. Validation of manual muscle testing and a subset of eight muscles for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62(4):465–72.
  • Lovell DJ, Lindsley CB, Rennebohm RM, Ballinger SH, Bowyer SL, Giannini EH, in cooperation with The Juvenile Dermatomyositis Disease Activity Collaborative Study Group, et al. Development of validated disease activity and damage indices for the juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: II. The Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale (CMAS): a quantitative tool for the evaluation of muscle function. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42(10):2213–9.
  • Quiñones R, Morgan GA, Amoruso M, Field R, Huang CC, Pachman LM. Lack of achievement of a full score on the childhood myositis assessment scale by healthy four-year-olds and those recovering from juvenile dermatomyositis. Arthritis Care Res. 2013;65(10):1697–701.
  • Disease Activity Core Set Measures. [last accessed 22 Jan 2020]. Available from: http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/imacs/diseaseactivity/index.cfm
  • Ruperto N, Ravelli A, Pistorio A, Ferriani V, Calvo I, Ganser G, et al. The provisional Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation/American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Disease activity core set for the evaluation of response to therapy in juvenile dermatomyositis: a prospective validation study. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:4–13.
  • Sultan SM, Allen E, Oddis CV, Kiely P, Cooper RG, Lundberg IE, et al. Reliability and validity of the myositis disease activity assessment tool. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(11):3593–9.
  • Lazarevic D, Pistorio A, Palmisani E, Miettunen P, Ravelli A, Pilkington C, for the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO), et al. The PRINTO criteria for clinically inactive disease in juvenile dermatomyositis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(5):686–93.
  • Almeida B, Campanilho-Marques R, Arnold K, Pilkington CA, Wedderburn LR, Nistala K, Juvenile Dermatomyositis Research Group. Analysis of published criteria for clinically inactive disease in a large juvenile dermatomyositis cohort shows that skin disease is underestimated. Arthritis Rheumatol. 201(67):2495–502.
  • Tansley SL, Betteridge ZE, McHugh NJ. The diagnostic utility of autoantibodies in adult and juvenile myositis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2013;25(6):772–7.
  • Godfrey R, Quinlivan R. Skeletal muscle disorders of glycogenolysis and glycolysis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(7):393–402.
  • Rubio-Gozalbo ME, Bakker JA, Waterham HR, Wanders RJA. Carnitine-acylcarnitine translocase deficiency, clinical, biochemical and genetic aspects. Mol Aspects Med. 2004;25(5–6):521–32.
  • Zürcher RM, Horber FF, Grünig BE, Frey FJ. Effect of thyroid dysfunction on thigh muscle efficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989;69(5):1082–6.
  • Kanazawa N. Nakajo–Nishimura syndrome: an autoinflammatory disorder showing pernio-like rashes and progressive partial lipodystrophy. Allergol Int. 2012;61(2):197–206.
  • Thyss A, el Baze P, Lefebvre JC, Schneider M, Ortonne JP. Dermatomyositis-like syndrome in X-linked hypogammaglobulinemia. Case-report and review of the literature . Acta Derm Venereol. 1990;70(4):309–13.
  • Sullivan DB, Cassidy JT, Petty RE, Burt A. Prognosis in childhood dermatomyositis. J Pediatr. 1972;80(4):555–63.
  • Bowyer SL, Blane CE, Sullivan DB, Cassidy JT. Childhood dermatomyositis: factors predicting functional outcome and development of dystrophic calcification. J Pediatr. 1983;103(6):882–8.
  • Fisler RE, Liang MG, Fuhlbrigge RC, Yalcindag A, Sundel RP. Aggressive management of juvenile dermatomyositis results in improved outcome and decreased incidence of calcinosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47(4):505–11.
  • Ravelli A, Trail L, Ferrari C, Ruperto N, Pistorio A, Pilkington C, et al. Long-term outcome and prognostic factors of juvenile dermatomyositis: a multinational, multicenter study of 490 patients. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62(1):63–72.
  • Al-Mayouf S, Al-Mazyed A, Bahabri S. Efficacy of early treatment of severe juvenile dermatomyositis with intravenous methylprednisolone and methotrexate. Clin Rheumatol. 2000;19(2):138–41.
  • Laxer RM, Stein LD, Petty RE. Intravenous pulse methylprednisolone treatment of juvenile dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum. 1987;30(3):328–34.
  • Seshadri R, Feldman BM, Ilowite N, Cawkwell G, Pachman LM. The role of aggressive corticosteroid therapy in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis: a propensity score analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(7):989–95.
  • Ramanan AV, Campbell-Webster N, Ota S, Parker S, Tran D, Tyrrell PN, et al. The effectiveness of treating juvenile dermatomyositis with methotrexate and aggressively tapered corticosteroids. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(11):3570–8.
  • Huber AM, Giannini EH, Bowyer SL, Kim S, Lang B, Lindsley CB, et al. Protocols for the initial treatment of moderately severe juvenile dermatomyositis: results of a Children’s Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Consensus Conference. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62:219–25.
  • Miller LC, Sisson BA, Tucker LB, DeNardo BA, Schaller JG. Methotrexate treatment of recalcitrant childhood dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35(10):1143–9.
  • Kobayashi I, Mori M, Yamaguchi K-i, Ito S, Iwata N, Masunaga K, et al. Pediatric Rheumatology Association of Japan (PRAJ) recommendation for vaccination in pediatric rheumatic diseases. Mod Rheumatic. 2015;25(3):335–43.
  • Hollar CB, Jorizzo JL. Topical tacrolimus 0.1% ointment for refractory skin disease in dermatomyositis: a pilot study. J Dermatol Treat. 2004;15(1):35–9.
  • Garcia-Doval I, Cruces M. Topical tacrolimus in cutaneous lesions of dermatomyositis: lack of effect in side-by-side comparison in five patients. Dermatology. 2004;209:247–8.
  • Tabarki B, Ponsot G, Prieur AM, Tardieu M. Childhood dermatomyositis: clinical course of 36 patients treated with low doses of corticosteroids. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 1998;2(4):205–11.
  • Ruperto N, Pistorio A, Oliveira S, Zulian F, Cuttica R, Ravelli A, et al. Prednisone versus prednisone plus ciclosporin versus prednisone plus methotrexate in new-onset juvenile dermatomyositis: a randomized trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10019):671–8.
  • Bunch TW, Worthington JW, Combs JJ, Ilstrup DM, Engel AG. Azathioprine with prednisone for polymyositis. A controlled, clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 1980;92(3):365–9.
  • Bunch TW. Prednisone and azathioprine for polymyositis: long-term followup. Arthritis Rheum. 1981;24(1):45–8.
  • Heckmatt J, Hasson N, Saunders C, Thompson N, Peters AM, Cambridge G, et al. Cyclosporin in juvenile dermatomyositis. Lancet. 1989;1:1063–6.
  • Reiff A, Rawlings DJ, Shaham B, Franke E, Richardson L, Szer IS, et al. Preliminary evidence for cyclosporine A as an alternative in the treatment of recalcitrant juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile dermatomyositis. J Rheumatol. 1997;24(12):2436–43.
  • Kobayashi I, Yamada M, Takahashi Y, Kawamura N, Okano M, Sakiyama Y, et al. Interstitial lung disease associated with juvenile dermatomyositis: clinical features and efficacy of cyclosporine A. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002;42(2):371–4.
  • Hssan J, van der Net JJ, van Royen-Kerkhof A. Treatment of refractory juvenile dermatomyositis with tacrolimus. Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27:1469–71.
  • Rouster-Stevens KA, Morgan GA, Wang D, Pachman LM. Mycophenolate mofetil: a possible therapeutic agent for children with juvenile dermatomyositis. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62(10):1446–51.
  • Dagher R, Desjonquères M, Duquesne A, Quartier P, Bader-Meunier B, Fischbach M, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil in juvenile dermatomyositis: a case series. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32(3):711–6.
  • Al-Mayouf SM, Laxer RM, Schneider R, Silverman ED, Feldman BM. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for juvenile dermatomyositis: efficacy and safety. J Rheumatol. 2000;27(10):2498–503.
  • Dalakas MC, Illa I, Dambrosia JM, Stein DP, Otero C, Dinsmore ST, et al. A controlled trial of high-dose intravenous immune globulin infusions as treatment for dermatomyositis. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(27):1993–2000.
  • Lam CG, Manlhiot C, Pullenayegum EM, Feldman EM. Efficacy of intravenous Ig therapy in juvenile dermatomyositis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(12):2089–94.
  • Riley P, Maillard SM, Wedderburn LR, Woo P, Murray KJ, Pilkington CA. Intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in juvenile dermatomyositis. A review of efficacy and safety. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43(4):491–6.
  • Deakin CT, Campanilho-Marques R, Simou S, Moraitis E, Wedderburn LR, Pullenayegum E, the Juvenile Dermatomyositis Research Group, et al. Efficacy and safety of cyclophosphamide treatment in severe juvenile dermatomyositis shown by marginal structural modeling. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(5):785–93.
  • Green DM, Liu W, Kutteh WH, Ke RW, Shelton KC, Sklar CA, et al. Cumulative alkylating agent exposure and semen parameters in adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(11):1215–23.
  • Oddis CV, Reed AM, Aggarwal R, Rider LG, Ascherman DP, Levesque MC, the RIM Study Group, et al. Rituximab in the treatment of refractory adult and juvenile dermatomyositis and adult polymyositis: a randomized, placebo-phase trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(2):314–24.
  • Bader-Meunier B, Decaluwe H, Barnerias C, Gherardi R, Quartier P, Faye A, et al. Safety and efficacy of rituximab in severe juvenile dermatomyositis: results from 9 patients from the French Autoimmunity and Rituximab registry. J Rheumatol. 2011;38(7):1436–40.
  • Dau PC. Plasma exchange in polymyositis and dermatomyositis. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(14):1030–1.
  • Momomura M, Miyamae T, Nozawa T, Kikuchi M, Kizawa T, Imagawa T, et al. Serum levels of anti-SRP54 antibodies reflect disease activity of necrotizing myopathy in a child treated effectively with combinatorial methylprednisolone pulses and plasma exchanges followed by intravenous cyclophosphamide. Mod Rheumatol. 2014;24(3):529–31.
  • Huber AM, Robinson AB, Reed AM, Abramson L, Bout-Tabaku S, Carrasco R, Juvenile Dermatomyositis Subcommittee of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance, et al. Consensus treatments for moderate juvenile dermatomyositis: beyond the first two months. Results of the second Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance consensus conference. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64(4):546–53.
  • Giancane G, Lavarello C, Pistorio A, Oliveira SK, Zulian F, Cuttica R, for the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO), et al. The PRINTO evidence-based proposal for glucocorticoids tapering/discontinuation in new onset juvenile dermatomyositis patients. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2019;17(1):24.
  • Marie I, Hachulla E, Chérin P, Hellot MF, Herson S, Levesque H, et al. Opportunistic infections in polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;15(53):155–65.
  • Migita K, Sasaki Y, Ishizuka N, Arai T, Kiyokawa T, Suematsu E, et al. Glucocorticoid therapy and the risk of infection in patients with newly diagnosed autoimmune disease. Medicine. 2013;92(5):285–93.
  • Stewart WA, Acott PD, Salisbury SR, Lang BA. Bone mineral density in juvenile dermatomyositis: assessment using dual x-ray absorptiometry. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(8):2294–8.
  • Lee CW, Muo CH, Liang JA, Sung FC, Hsu CY, Kao CH. Increased osteoporosis risk in dermatomyositis or polymyositis independent of the treatments: a population-based cohort study with propensity score. Endocrine. 2016;52(1):86–92.
  • Suzuki Y, Nawata H, Soen S, Fujiwara S, Nakayama H, Tanaka I, et al. Guidelines on the management and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis of the Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research: 2014 update. J Bone Miner Metab. 2014;32(4):337–50.
  • Bianchi ML, Cimaz R, Bardare M, Zulian F, Lepore L, Boncompagni A, et al. Efficacy and safety of alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis in diffuse connective tissue diseases in children: a prospective multicenter study. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(9):1960–6.
  • Yokota S. The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan Study Group Report on Severe Pediatric Rheumatic Disease. Tokyo: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; 2010 (in Japanese).
  • Sanner H, Aalokken TM, Gran JT, Sjaastad I, Johansen B, Flatø B. Pulmonary outcome in juvenile dermatomyositis: a case-control study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(1):86–91.
  • Mathiesen P, Hegaard H, Herlin T, Zak M, Pedersen FK, Nielsen S. Long-term outcome in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis: a cross-sectional follow-up study. Scand J Rheumatol. 2012;41(1):50–8.
  • Tanizawa K, Handa T, Nakashima R, Kubo T, Hosono Y, Watanabe K, et al. HRCT features of interstitial lung disease in dermatomyositis with anti-CADM-140 antibody. Respir Med. 2011;105(9):1380–7.
  • Kurita T, Yasuda S, Oba K, Odani T, Kono M, Otomo K, et al. The efficacy of tacrolimus in patients with interstitial lung diseases complicated with polymyositis or dermatomyositis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015;54(1):39–44.
  • Kameda H, Nagasawa H, Ogawa H, Sekiguchi N, Takei H, Tokuhira M, et al. Combination therapy with corticosteroids, cyclosporin A, and intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide for acute/subacute interstitial pneumonia in patients with dermatomyositis. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(9):1719–26.
  • Bakewell CJ, Raghu G. Polymyositis associated with severe interstitial lung disease: remission after three doses of IV immunoglobulin. Chest. 2011;139(2):441–3.
  • Hamada-Ode K, Taniguchi Y, Kimata T, Kawaguchi Y, Shimamura Y, Kuwana M, et al. High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for rapidly progressive interstitial pneumonitis accompanied by anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody-positive amyopathic dermatomyositis. Eur J Rheumatol. 2015;2:83–5.
  • Suzuki Y, Hayakawa H, Miwa S, Shirai M, Fujii M, Gemma H, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for refractory interstitial lung disease associated with polymyositis/dermatomyositis. Lung. 2009;187(3):201–6.
  • Marie I, Dominique S, Janvresse A, Levesque H, Menard JF. Rituximab therapy for refractory interstitial lung disease related to antisynthetase syndrome. Respir Med. 2012;106(4):581–7.
  • Sem M, Molberg O, Lund MB, Gran JT. Rituximab treatment of the anti-synthetase syndrome: a retrospective case series. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009;48(8):968–71.
  • Vandenbroucke E, Grutters JC, Altenburg J, Boersma WG, ter Borg EJ, van den Bosch JM. Rituximab in life threatening antisynthetase syndrome. Rheumatol Int. 2009;29(12):1499–502.
  • Cozzani E, Cinotti E, Felletti R, Pelucco D, Rebora A, Parodi A. Amyopathic dermatomyositis with lung involvement responsive to mycophenolate mofetil. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2013;35(6):687–92.
  • Hervier B, Masseau A, Mussini JM, Audrain M, Hamidou MA. Long-term efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in a case of refractory antisynthetase syndrome. Joint Bone Spine. 2009;76(5):575–6.
  • Marie I, Hatron PY, Dominique S, Cherin P, Mouthon L, Menard JF. Short-term and long-term outcomes of interstitial lung disease in polymyositis and dermatomyositis: a series of 107 patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(11):3439–47.
  • Mira-Avendano IC, Parambil JG, Yadav R, Arrossi V, Xu M, Chapman JT, et al. A retrospective review of clinical features and treatment outcomes in steroid-resistant interstitial lung disease from polymyositis/dermatomyositis. Respir Med. 2013;107(6):890–6.
  • Morganroth PA, Kreider ME, Werth VP. Mycophenolate mofetil for interstitial lung disease in dermatomyositis. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62(10):1496–501.
  • Sundaragiri PR, Vallabhajosyula S, Kanaan JP. Interstitial lung disease in antisynthetase syndrome without clinical myositis. BMJ Case Rep. 2014;2014:pii: bcr2014204296.
  • Swigris JJ, Olson AL, Fischer A, Lynch DA, Cosgrove GP, Frankel SK, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil is safe, well tolerated, and preserves lung function in patients with connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease. Chest. 2006;130(1):30–6.
  • Tsuchiya H, Tsuno H, Inoue M, Takahashi Y, Yamashita H, Kaneko H, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil therapy for rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease in a patient with clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis. Mod Rheumatol. 2014;24(4):694–6.
  • Bozkirli DE, Kozanoglu I, Bozkirli E, Yucel E. Antisynthetase syndrome with refractory lung involvement and myositis successfully treated with double filtration plasmapheresis. J Clin Apheresis. 2013;28(6):422–5.
  • Omotoso BA, Ogden MI, Balogun RA. Therapeutic plasma exchange in antisynthetase syndrome with severe interstitial lung disease. J Clin Apheresis. 2015;30(6):375–9.
  • Antonelli M, Fumagalli R, Cruz DN, Brienza N, Giunta F, EUPHAS Study Group. PMX endotoxin removal in the clinical practice: results from the EUPHAS trial. Contrib Nephrol. 2010;167:83–90.
  • Ichiyasu H, Horio Y, Tsumura S, Hirosako S, Sakamoto Y, Sakata S, et al. Favorable outcome with hemoperfusion of polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column for rapidly progressive interstitial pneumonia associated with clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis: report of three cases. Mod Rheumatol. 2014;24(2):361–5.
  • Kakugawa T, Mukae H, Saito M, Ishii K, Ishimoto H, Sakamoto N, et al. Rapidly progressive interstitial pneumonia associated with clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis successfully treated with polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column hemoperfusion. Intern Med. 2008;47(8):785–90.
  • Teruya A, Kawamura K, Ichikado K, Sato S, Yasuda Y, Yoshioka M. Successful polymyxin B hemoperfusion treatment associated with serial reduction of serum anti-CADM-140/MDA5 antibody levels in rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease with amyopathic dermatomyositis. Chest* 2013;144(6):1934–6.
  • Al-Mayouf SM, Al-Eid W, Bahabri S, Al-Mofada S. Interstitial pneumonitis and air leakage in juvenile dermatomyositis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001;40:588–90.
  • Robinson AB, Hoeltzel MF, Wahezi DM, Becker ML, Kessler EA, Schmeling H, the Juvenile Myositis CARRA Subgroup, for the CARRA Registry Investigators, et al. Clinical characteristics of children with juvenile dermatomyositis: The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry. Arthritis Care Res. 2014;66(3):404–10.
  • Balin SJ, Wetter DA, Andersen LK, Davis MD. Calcinosis cutis occurring in association with autoimmune connective tissue disease: the Mayo Clinic experience with 78 patients, 1996–2009. Arch Dermatol. 2012;148:455–62.
  • Rider LG. Calcinosis in juvenile dermatomyositis: pathogenesis and current therapies. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2003;1:2.
  • Blane CE, White SJ, Braunstein EM, Bowyer SL, Sullivan DB. Patterns of calcification in childhood dermatomyositis. Am J Roentgenol. 1984;142(2):397–400.
  • Shimizu M, Ueno K, Ishikawa S, Kasahara Y, Yachie A. Role of activated macrophage and inflammatory cytokines in the development of calcinosis in juvenile dermatomyositis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53(4):766–7.
  • Shahi V, Wetter DA, Howe BM, Ringler MD, Davis DM. Plain radiography is effective for the detection of calcinosis cutis is occurring in association with autoimmune connective tissue disease. Br J Dermatol. 2014;170(5):1073–9.
  • Oliveri MB, Palermo R, Mautalen C, Hübscher O. Regression of calcinosis during diltiazem treatment in juvenile dermatomyositis. J Rheumatol. 1996;23(12):2152–5.
  • Nakagawa T, Takaiwa T. Calcinosis cutis in juvenile dermatomyositis responsive to aluminum hydroxide treatment. J Dermatol. 1993;20(9):558–60.
  • Wang WJ, Lo WL, Wong CK. Calcinosis cutis in juvenile dermatomyositis: remarkable response to aluminum hydroxide therapy. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124(11):1721–2.
  • Touimy M, Janani S, Rachidi W, Etaouil N, Mkinsi O. Calcinosis universalis complicating juvenile dermatomyositis: improvement after intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. Joint Bone Spine. 2013;80(1):108–9.
  • Miyamae T, Sano F, Ozawa R, Imagawa T, Inayama Y, Yokota S. Efficacy of thalidomide in a girl with inflammatory calcinosis, a severe complication of juvenile dermatomyositis. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2010;8(1):6.
  • Nakamura H, Kawakami A, Ida H, Ejima E, Origuchi T, Eguchi K. Efficacy of probenecid for a patient with juvenile dermatomyositis complicated with calcinosis. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(8):1691–3.
  • Al-Mayouf SM, Alsonbul A, Alismail K. Localized calcinosis in juvenile dermatomyositis: successful treatment with intralesional corticosteroids injection. Int J Rheum Dis. 2010;13(3):e26–8.
  • Marco Puche A, Calvo Penades I, Lopez MB. Effectiveness of the treatment with intravenous pamidronate in calcinosis in juvenile dermatomyositis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010;28(1):135–40.
  • Ambler GR, Chaitow J, Rogers M, McDonald DW, Ouvrier RA. Rapid improvement of calcinosis in juvenile dermatomyositis with alendronate therapy. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(9):1837–9.
  • Riley P, McCann LJ, Maillard SM, Woo P, Murray KJ, Pilkington CA. Effectiveness of infliximab in the treatment of refractory juvenile dermatomyositis with calcinosis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008;47(6):877–80.
  • Arabshahi B, Silverman RA, Jones OY, Rider LG. Abatacept and sodium thiosulfate for treatment of recalcitrant juvenile dermatomyositis complicated by ulceration and calcinosis. J Pediatr. 2012;160(3):520–2.
  • Vitale A, Delia G, La Torre F, Calcagno G, D’Alcontres FS. Massive gluteal calcinosis in a 10-year-old girl with juvenile dermatomyositis: successful surgical management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:e456–8.
  • Wu JJ, Metz BJ. Calcinosis cutis of juvenile dermatomyositis treated with incision and drainage. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34:575–7.
  • Kobayashi I, Kawamura N, Okano M, Sageshima S, Nakayama T, Ohyu J, et al. Thrombocytopaenia in juvenile dermatomyositis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2006;35(1):79–80.
  • Milisenda JC, Doti PI, Prieto-Gonzalez S, Grau JM. Dermatomyositis presenting with severe subcutaneous edema: five additional cases and review of the literature. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014;44(2):228–33.
  • Mitchell JP, Dennis GJ, Rider LG. Juvenile dermatomyositis presenting with anasarca: a possible indicator of severe disease activity. J Pediatr. 2001;138(6):942–5.
  • Karabiber H, Aslan M, Alkan A, Yakinci C. A rare complication of generalized edema in juvenile dermatomyositis: a report of one case. Brain Dev. 2004;26(4):269–72.
  • Huemer C, Kitson H, Malleson PN, Sanderson S, Huemer M, Cabral DA, et al. Lipodystrophy in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis—evaluation of clinical and metabolic abnormalities. J Rheumatol. 2001;28(3):610–5.
  • Verma S, Singh S, Bhalla AK, Khullar M. Study of subcutaneous fat in children with juvenile dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55(4):564–8.
  • Bingham A, Mamyrova G, Rother KI, Oral E, Cochran E, Premkumar A, et al. Predictors of acquired lipodystrophy in juvenile-onset dermatomyositis and a gradient of severity. Medicine (Baltimore). 2008;87(2):70–86.
  • Garg A. Acquired and inherited lipodystrophies. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(12):1220–34.
  • Lebasrchi J, Ajluni N, Neidert A, Oral EA. A report of three cases with acquired generalized lipodystrophy with distinct autoimmune conditions treated with metreptin. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol. 2015;100:3967–70.
  • Karaca NE, Aksu G, Yeniay BS, Kutukculer N. Juvenile dermatomyositis with a rare and remarkable complication: sinus bradycardia. Rheumatol Int. 2006;27(2):179–82.
  • Pereira RM, Lerner S, Maeda WT, Goldenstein-Schainberg C, Cossermelli W. Pericardial tamponade in juvenile dermatomyositis. Clin Cardiol. 1992;15(4):301–3.
  • Crowe WE, Bove KE, Levinson JE, Hilton PK. Clinical and pathogenetic implicatins of histopathology in childhood polydermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum. 1982;25(2):126–39.
  • Pachman LM, Cooke N. Juvenile dermatomypsitis: a clinical and immunologic study. J Pediatr. 1980;96(2):226–34.
  • Schwartz T, Sanner H, Husebye T, Flatø B, Sjaastad I. Cardiac dysfunction in juvenile dermatomyositis: a case-control study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(5):766–71.
  • Schwartz T, Sanner H, Gjesdal O, Flatø B, Sjaastad I. In juvenile dermatomyositis, cardiac systolic dysfunction is present after long-term follow-up and is predicted by sustained early skin activity. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(10):1805–10.
  • Yoshimatsu Y, Kotani T, Fujiki Y, Oda K, Kataoka T, Yamairi K, et al. Successful treatment with intravenous high-dose immunoglobulin for cardiomyopathy in dermatomyositis complicated with progressive interstitial pneumonia. Int J Rheum Dis. 2019;22(2):321–4.
  • Magill HL, Hixson SD, Whitington G, Igarashi M, Hannissian A. Duodenal perforation in childhood dermatomyositis. Pediatr Radiol. 1984;14(1):28–30.
  • Mamyrova G, Kleiner DE, James-Newton L, Shaham B, Miller FW, Rider LG. Late-onset gastrointestinal pain in juvenile dermatomyositis as a manifestation of ischemic ulceration from chronic endarteopathy. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(5):881–4.
  • Singh S, Suri D, Aulakh R, Gupta A, Rawat A, Kumar RM. Mortality in children with juvenile dermatomyositis: two decades of experience from a single tertiary care centre in North India. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33(11):1675–9.
  • Wang IJ, Hsu WM, Shun CT, Chiang BL, Ni YH. Juvenile dermatomyositis complicated with vasculitis and duodenal perforation. J Formos Med Assoc. 2001;100(12):844–6.
  • Marie I, Menard JF, Hatron PY, Hachulla E, Mouthon L, Tiev K, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulins for steroid-refractory esophageal involvement related to polymyositis and dermatomyositis: a series of 73 patients. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62(12):1748–55.
  • Tse S, Lubelsky S, Gordon M, Al Mayouf SM, Babyn PS, Laxer RM, et al. The arthritis of inflammatory childhood myositis syndrome. J Rheumatol. 2001;28(1):192–7.
  • Hall JC, Casciola-Rosen L, Samedy LA, Werner J, Owoyemi K, Danoff SK, et al. Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5-associated dermatomyositis: expanding the clinical spectrum. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013;65(8):1307–15.
  • Yen TH, Lai PC, Chen CC, Huang JY. Renal involvement in patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Clin Pract. 2005;59:188–93.
  • Xie Q, Liu Y, Liu G, Yang N, Yin G. Diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis associated with dermatomyositis with nephrotic syndrome. Rheumatol Int. 2010;30(6):821–5.
  • Soylu A, Kavukçu S, Türkmen M, Saroğlu S. Dermatomyositis with membranous nephropathy. Turk J Pediatr. 2001;43(2):143–5.
  • Nickavar A, Mehr Azma M. Nephrotic syndrome and juvenile dermatomyositis. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32(9):2933–5.
  • Couvrat-Desvergnes G, Masseau A, Benveniste O, Bruel A, Hervier B, Mussini J-M, et al. The spectrum of involvement in patients with inflammatory myopathies. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014;93(1):33–41.
  • Marie I. Morbidity and mortality in adult polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2012;14(3):275–85.