217
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
CD34 Enumeration

Comparison of two single-platform ISHAGE-based CD34 enumeration protocols on BD FACSCalibur and FACSCanto flow cytometers

, , , , &
Pages 595-605 | Published online: 16 Sep 2009
 

Abstract

Background aims

Enumeration of viable CD34+ cells provides critical information for the bone marrow (BM) transplant physician. The single-platform ISHAGE protocol is the most reliable method currently available to quantitate accurately this important subset of cells. Previous studies have shown that 5 CD34+ cells/µL blood predicts the collection of at least 0.5×106 CD34+ cells/kg patient weight. From the apheresis product, infusion of 2.5×106 viable CD34+ cells (measured pre-cryopreservation)/kg patient weight will reliably permit engraftment of the hematopoietic system (as measured by the time to 20000 platelets/µL) by day 12–14 post-infusion.

Methods

We compared the CD34+ cell numbers derived from Flow Count-based Stem-Kit™; (Beckman Coulter) and Trucount™ tube-based stem cell enumeration (SCE) kit (BD Biosciences) ISHAGE templates on BD FACSCalibur™ and BD FACSCanto™ cytometers on 12 granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood (MPB) and 10 peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) samples.

Results

Comparison of results showed that there was no statistical difference between samples run with Stem-Kit on the FACSCalibur versus SCE kit-based assays on either the FACSCalibur or FACSCanto. Mean results for the Stem-Kit/Calibur combination were 137, for SCE kit/Calibur 140 and for SCE kit/Canto 137 cells/µL. Pair-wise comparison of data based on rank order showed no statistically significant difference and all correlation coefficients had an R2>0.98.

Conclusions

The two kits generated very similar data on a range of fresh samples regardless of instrument platform. These results confirm and extend the utility of the single-platform ISHAGE protocols with a variety of reagent kits and instrument platforms.

Declaration of interest: This study was sponsored by BD Biosciences. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.