ABSTRACT
Introduction: Sound is integral to communication and connects us to the world through speech and music. Cochlear hair cells are essential for converting sounds into neural impulses. However, these cells are highly susceptible to damage from an array of factors, resulting in degeneration and ultimately irreversible hearing loss in humans. Since the discovery of hair cell regeneration in birds, there have been tremendous efforts to identify therapies that could promote hair cell regeneration in mammals.
Areas covered: Here, we will review recent studies describing spontaneous hair cell regeneration and direct cellular reprograming as well as other factors that mediate mammalian hair cell regeneration.
Expert opinion: Numerous combinatorial approaches have successfully reprogrammed non-sensory supporting cells to form hair cells, albeit with limited efficacy and maturation. Studies on epigenetic regulation and transcriptional network of hair cell progenitors may accelerate discovery of more promising reprogramming regimens.
Article Highlights
Limited spontaneous hair cell regeneration occurs in the neonatal mouse cochlea and in the neonatal and adult mouse utricle.
As in non-mammalian species, supporting cells in mammalian sensory organs can act as hair cell progenitors.
Cochlear supporting cells rapidly lose the ability to regenerate hair cells as the organ matures.
Direct cellular reprogramming is efficacious in inducing ectopic hair cells in the neonatal cochlea; however, results have been mixed in the mature organ.
The overall efficacy of a combination approach to induce hair cell regeneration in the mature cochlea remains low.
This box summarizes key points contained in the article.
Acknowledgments
We thank Z. Sayyid and T. Jan for critical reading and C. Gralapp for graphical illustration.
Declaration of interest
The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
Reviewer disclosures
Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial relationships or otherwise to disclose.