ABSTRACT
Introduction: The use of antidepressants (AD) in the treatment of bipolar depression is one of the most controversial issues in psychopharmacology. For some, AD are useful, but, for others, they should never be used in bipolar depression.
Areas covered: This review examines published clinical studies on the use of ADs in bipolar depression, addressing their clinical efficacy and the occurrence of side effects, manic switches, cycle acceleration, and suicidal behavior. Meta-analyzes and review articles on the subject are also discussed.
Expert opinion: Approved therapeutic options for bipolar depression are associated with not very high response rates and a high incidence of adverse effects. Patients with bipolar depression present very heterogeneous responses to the use of ADs. Some improve significantly, while others, especially those with concomitant manic symptoms, have had previous episodes of treatment-emergent mania or are rapid cyclers, exhibit manic switches or cycle acceleration. The authors conclude that the real question is not whether ADs should or should not be used in bipolar depression, but which patients benefit from these drugs and which ones are impaired. The concept of bipolar spectrum and a dimensional approach on bipolar/unipolar distinction may be useful for understanding the heterogeneity of responses to ADs.
Article highlights
The use of antidepressants (AD) in the treatment of bipolar depression is one of the most controversial issues in psychopharmacology.
Approved therapeutic options for bipolar depression are associated with not very high response rates and a high incidence of adverse effects.
Responses to ADs in bipolar depression are very heterogeneous and have not been adequately tested.
The real question is not whether ADs should or should not be used in bipolar depression, but which patients benefit from these drugs and which ones are impaired.
Considering a dimensional approach on bipolar / unipolar distinction, it can be presumed that patients with bipolar depression treated with ADs have a higher or a lower risk of manic switching or cycle acceleration depending on whether they are closer to one extreme or the opposite one on a continuum.
This box summarizes key points contained in the article.
Declaration of interest
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.
Reviewer disclosures
Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.