288
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The interplay between burnout risk and attachment styles among palliative care practitioners

ORCID Icon, , , , , , & show all
Received 03 May 2020, Accepted 27 Mar 2021, Published online: 10 May 2021
 

Abstract

The psychological features of burnout have been extensively investigated among different healthcare practitioners. However, studies on the relationship between burnout and attachment styles are limited. Furthermore, there is a paucity of evidence on the prevalence of burnout in the field of palliative care. The current study aimed to examine burnout symptoms in a sample of practitioners specialising in palliative care and to investigate the role of attachment styles in these symptoms. A sample of 108 specialist palliative care practitioners participated in this study. The Italian version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and the Attachment Styles Questionnaire (ASQ) were administered to them. The results showed a low burnout risk for emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation, and lack of personal accomplishment in the sample. However, correlational analysis showed significant associations between MBI and ASQ dimensions. Specifically, confidence in self and others was negatively correlated with emotional exhaustion. Discomfort with closeness, need for approval, and preoccupation with relationships were all positively correlated with emotional exhaustion. The results of regression analyses showed that confidence in attachment relationships was a significant and negative predictor for emotional exhaustion. Also, years of experience positively added to the prediction, suggesting that both attachment styles and work experiences represent specific factors for burnout. Implications for the selection of personnel, implementation of structured interventions, and the supervision of palliative care practitioners are discussed.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This research did not receive any grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 341.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.