2,360
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

PCV15, a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, for the prevention of invasive pneumococcal disease in infants and children

, , ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 137-147 | Received 18 Aug 2023, Accepted 07 Dec 2023, Published online: 20 Dec 2023

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Streptococcus pneumoniae is a causative agent of pneumonia and acute otitis media (AOM), as well as invasive diseases such as meningitis and bacteremia. PCV15 (V114) is a new 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) approved for use in individuals ≥6 weeks of age for the prevention of pneumonia, AOM, and invasive pneumococcal disease.

Areas Covered

This review summarizes the V114 Phase 3 development program leading to approval in infants and children, including pivotal studies, interchangeability and catch-up vaccination studies, and studies in at-risk populations. An integrated safety summary is presented in addition to immunogenicity and concomitant use of V114 with other routine pediatric vaccines.

Expert Opinion

Across the development program, V114 demonstrated a safety profile that is comparable to PCV13 in infants and children. Immunogenicity of V114 is comparable to PCV13 for all shared serotypes except serotype 3, where V114 demonstrated superior immunogenicity. Higher immune responses were demonstrated for V114 serotypes 22F and 33F. Results of the ongoing study to evaluate V114 efficacy against vaccine-type pneumococcal AOM and anticipated real-world evidence studies will support assessment of vaccine effectiveness and impact, with an additional question of whether higher serotype 3 immunogenicity translates to better protection against serotype 3 pneumococcal disease.

1. Introduction

Disease caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) can be serious and sometimes life threatening. In the 20th century, the pneumococcus was recognized as the chief cause of lobar pneumonia. Pneumococcal pneumonia deaths are declining due to vaccination; however, in 2019 pneumonia was still the leading cause of death in children under 5 years of age worldwide, with the pneumococcus remaining a major causative agent of pneumonia. Pneumococcus also remains a leading cause of bacterial meningitis, sinusitis, and acute otitis media (AOM), despite advances made in the prevention of pneumococcal disease through vaccines [Citation1–6]. Children under one year of age are particularly vulnerable to invasive pneumococcal diseases (IPD) such as meningitis and bacteremia [Citation7].

More than 100 pneumococcal serotypes have been described based on the specific composition of the polysaccharide capsule, the major virulence factor of the bacterium. However, not all serotypes have a similar potential to cause disease. A few serotypes are typically responsible for the majority of disease worldwide, and these can vary with age and geography [Citation8,Citation9]. The introduction of pneumococcal vaccines and other factors have caused a shift in disease-causing serotypes with substantial regional variability. The quest to develop preventative pneumococcal vaccines dates back more than a century [Citation10] with the first polysaccharide vaccine, containing the capsular polysaccharides of 14 serotypes, becoming available in 1977 followed by the 23-valent vaccine (PPSV23) in 1983. PPSV23 remains the pneumococcal vaccine most widely used globally in adults; however, it has poor immunogenicity in infants under 2 years of age. Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) have been developed to address the need for protection against all pneumococcal disease (PD), particularly in infants and children.

To improve the immune response to the capsular polysaccharide in infants and children, following the model established for Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine [Citation11], vaccines in which capsular polysaccharides are conjugated to one of several carrier proteins were developed. PCV7 (Prevnar™) was the first approved and widely used PCV [Citation12]. The conjugation of pneumococcal polysaccharides to a nontoxic carrier protein in PCVs provides an immunogen for induction of T cell-dependent immune responses to the polysaccharides and subsequent increased vaccine immunogenicity in infants. Shortly after the release of PCV7, several studies demonstrated the protective nature of vaccine-induced antibodies raised against the capsular polysaccharide [Citation13,Citation14]. Within a few years of the introduction of PCV7 in infant immunization programs, a > 90% reduction in vaccine type IPD was observed [Citation15,Citation16]. However, pneumococcal serotypes causing disease have continued to evolve due to natural pressures and in response to vaccine use. Therefore, the ongoing development of new PCVs has been critical to broaden coverage against newly emerging, clinically relevant serotypes for expanded protection globally while maintaining suppression of serotypes included in prior PCVs. Currently, Synflorix® (PCV10, GlaxoSmithKline) [Citation17], Prevnar 13® (PCV13, Pfizer) [Citation18], and more recently Pneumosil® (PCV10, Serum Institute of India) [Citation19], VAXNEUVANCE® (PCV15, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, U.S.A. [MSD]) [Citation20], and Prevnar 20® (PCV20, Pfizer) [Citation21] are currently available PCVs in various regions globally for use in infants and children.

Post-licensure studies from the post-PCV10 and PCV13 era have shown that PCVs not only significantly reduce the overall incidence of IPD by reducing IPD caused by serotypes contained in the vaccine [Citation2,Citation22–29] but also have a beneficial impact on reducing pneumococcal-related pneumonia [Citation30–35] and AOM [Citation5,Citation23,Citation36–40]. This is accompanied by a reduction in nasopharyngeal colonization of most pneumococcal vaccine serotypes [Citation41–45], which contributes to indirect community protection [Citation46]. All these factors have resulted in significant reductions in pneumococcal-related hospitalizations and deaths in nations with successful PCV national infant immunization programs [Citation32,Citation34,Citation47–49]. As a result of the overall efficacy and effectiveness of PCVs, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends pneumococcal vaccines be included in childhood vaccination programs globally. As of 2020, 148 countries have instituted PCVs into their national immunization programs, either nationally or sub-nationally. Despite this, approximately half of infants globally have not received a complete PCV series [Citation50]. Current infant PCV vaccination regimens most widely used include a 3-dose (two primary infant doses and a toddler dose or three infant doses) or 4-dose (3 primary infant doses and a toddler dose) series.

In recent years, several non-vaccine serotypes have become the predominant causes of pediatric PD with associated morbidity/mortality and antibiotic resistance in multiple regions globally, with serotypes 22F and 33F among the leading serotypes [Citation24,Citation25,Citation51–55]. In addition, some serotypes included in currently approved PCVs are still major contributors to residual PD, of which serotypes 3, 19A, and 19F are most prominent. Serotype 3 is a unique case, in that several studies have concluded little to no effect of PCV13 on reducing IPD attributed to this serotype [Citation26,Citation36,Citation56–58]. In a recent analysis of IPD (2014–2019) in children under 5 years of age in 30 high-income countries with PCV national immunization programs (mixed data of PCV10 and PCV13), approximately one quarter of residual IPD was from serotypes 3 and 19A [Citation59]. Furthermore, the prominence of these serotypes has persisted following the COVID-19 pandemic [Citation60,Citation61].

The primary objectives of the development program for PCV15 (also referred to as V114, the name of the clinical development program; contains serotypes 1, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 9 V, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F, 23F, 22F, and 33F) were to 1) maintain protection against PD caused by serotypes found in PCV13, 2) induce robust immunogenicity to two key serotypes causing residual disease (22F and 33F), and 3) improve immunogenicity and subsequent protection against serotype 3. For serotype 3, it is well established that unique features of its capsular polysaccharide and a high rate of capsular shedding contribute to lower vaccine-induced immune responses to this serotype [Citation62–64]. These data were considered during V114 development in order to maximize the number of active targets for induction of the serotype 3 immune response.

In the initial Phase 1 and 2 studies, V114 was found to be immunogenic in adults. However, immune responses to some serotypes in infants were suboptimal [Citation65]. As a result, additional formulations were tested to optimize the responses against all 15 serotypes [Citation66]. Subsequently, comprehensive Phase 3 clinical development programs were designed for both pediatric and adult populations to evaluate the tolerability, safety, and immunogenicity in populations in need of PD prevention.

The adult Phase 3 program demonstrated that V114 is well tolerated with a safety profile similar to that of PCV13. V114 induced robust immune responses to all 15 serotypes included in the vaccine after a single dose, which were non-inferior to the immune responses observed with PCV13 for the 13 shared serotypes and higher for serotypes 22F and 33F. This was true in healthy adults ≥18 years of age, as well as older adults ≥65 years of age, and individuals living with HIV or with one or more known risk factors for PD [Citation67–73]. Importantly, V114 was shown to induce superior immune responses to serotype 3 as compared to PCV13 which, pending real-world evidence, has the potential to address the significant burden of disease due to this serotype that remains in many populations worldwide [Citation71]. These findings led to the licensure of V114 for use in adults in many regions globally.

Following proof of concept and formulation adjustments during Phase 2 studies [Citation74], the V114 Phase 3 pediatric development program commenced shortly after the adult program and included a comprehensive set of randomized controlled trials evaluating 3 + 1 and 2 + 1 vaccination regimens in healthy infants, as well as catch-up vaccination and interchangeability with PCV13. Additional studies have evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of V114 in infants and children 6 weeks through 17 years of age with risk conditions of interest for whom pneumococcal vaccination is indicated (). A global approach was taken to clinical study site selection for the assessment of V114 in a diverse participant population. As a result, the Phase 3 program included over 350 study sites with participants from 6 continents and 28 countries globally. In all, over 10,000 infants and children have participated in the V114 development program to date. The data derived from this program resulted in the approval and licensing of V114 for use in infants and children in over 30 countries to date, including the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, European Union, Japan, and Australia [Citation75–78] with other approvals currently in process. Herein, a detailed review of the V114 Phase 3 pediatric development program will comprehensively summarize data regarding safety, immunogenicity, concomitant vaccine use, and use within special populations.

Table 1. PCV15 pediatric Phase 3 studies.

2. Body

2.1. Overall study objectives and endpoints

The V114 clinical program was aligned with guidelines from the WHO for the development of new PCVs. This included the use of PCV13 as an active comparator since this was the highest valency PCV licensed in infants and children during the V114 Phase 3 program. Immunogenicity of V114 was bridged to a PCV with established efficacy/effectiveness (through determination of serotype-specific noninferiority of V114 to PCV13) as a means of predicting the effectiveness of V114 since placebo-controlled effectiveness studies are unethical in the post-PCV era. Study designs, populations, endpoints, and statistical criteria were additionally reviewed with multiple regulatory agencies (US FDA, EMA, and Health Canada) for alignment before the initiation of the comprehensive Phase 3 program.

The following endpoints were applied to vaccination with V114 as well as PCV13 for evaluation of V114 safety outcomes. Evaluation of participant safety and tolerability was a primary objective in all V114 clinical trials and included assessment of solicited injection-site and systemic adverse events (AEs), unsolicited AEs, serious AEs (SAEs), and deaths that occurred during the trial. In addition, daily temperature measurements were solicited for 7 days following each study vaccination, and days 8–14 if fever was suspected. AE intensity (measure of impact to function as mild, moderate, or severe which is distinct from serious AE assessment) and duration in days were recorded to characterize AEs within the trial. Electronic vaccination report cards (eVRC) were used with participants and their parents to record safety events for subsequent review by study investigators. SAEs and deaths were recorded from the beginning of the trial to at least 6 months following the last study vaccination. Relatedness to the study vaccines was assessed by the study investigators. In all studies discussed below, baseline demographics were comparable between intervention groups.

Serotype-specific IgG concentration was used to test the primary immunogenicity hypotheses for all participants, in accordance with WHO [Citation79]. Given the established association of IgG responses and functional antibody levels via opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) in children [Citation80–83], the WHO recommends OPA data be generated for a subset of vaccinated children in some or all clinical studies [Citation79]. As such, OPA was descriptively evaluated as a supportive endpoint. IgG was measured using the pneumococcal electrochemiluminescence v2.0 assay, which was bridged to a WHO international reference standard [Citation84,Citation85], and OPA was measured using a validated multiplex opsonophagocytic assay [Citation86]. Immunogenicity endpoints were assessed following the primary infant PCV series (post-primary series, PPS, dose 2 in the 2 + 1 studies and dose 3 in the 3 + 1 studies) and following the toddler dose (post-toddler dose, PTD). Immunogenicity was evaluated for all 15 serotypes contained in V114 in participants who received V114 or PCV13, in order to compare immune responses for the 13 shared serotypes between vaccines and determine whether immune responses to serotypes 22F and 33F were induced following V114. Immunogenicity endpoints included serotype-specific response rates (the proportion of participants meeting the WHO reference IgG concentration ≥0.35 μg/mL for each serotype), IgG geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), and bactericidal activity as measured by OPA geometric mean titers (GMTs) and response rates.

2.2. Pivotal V114 studies

The three pivotal studies (V114–025, V114–026, V114–029) for the V114 program evaluated safety and immunogenicity using 3 + 1 (V114–029 [Citation87]) and 2 + 1 (V114–025 and −026, one using standard [2 and 4 months of age] and the other using alternative [3 and 5 months of age] timing for the primary infant series [Citation88,Citation89]) vaccination regimens. These studies were powered to test hypotheses for noninferiority of serotype-specific immune responses comparing V114 to PCV13 response rates and IgG GMC ratios (V114/PCV13) for the shared serotypes and superiority of serotypes 22F and 33F. The 3 + 1 study had additional immunogenicity hypotheses for noninferiority of serotypes 22F and 33F (immunogenicity was compared to the lowest observed serotype response in the PCV13 group, excluding serotype 3) and superiority of serotype 3 compared to PCV13. As per WHO recommendations and regulatory requirements, serotype-specific noninferiority for immunogenicity was evaluated at PTD in the 2 + 1 studies and at both PPS and PTD in the 3 + 1 study. In addition to the pivotal studies, a dedicated safety study was performed with over 2,400 infants randomized in a 5:1 ratio (V114: PCV13) such that approximately 2,000 received V114 in a 3 + 1 vaccination regimen (V114–031) for comprehensive safety assessment.

2.2.1. Safety

In the three pivotal studies (V114–025, V114–026, and V114–029) and the dedicated safety study (V114–031) totaling >6,000 participants, V114 was well tolerated with a safety profile consistent with PCV13. All safety outcomes, including proportions of participants with AEs, solicited AEs, vaccine-related AEs, distribution of maximum daily temperature measurements, SAEs, and AE intensity and duration, were generally comparable between groups. In terms of individual solicited AEs, some studies reported higher proportions of participants in the V114 group with injection-site pain, irritability (in V114–025 and V114–031 studies), injection-site erythema, and decreased appetite (in V114–031 study only) when compared to the PCV13 group. However, these differences did not present as a pattern across all studies. In addition, most of these AEs were categorized as mild or moderate in intensity and were of short duration (≤3 days), and therefore these differences are unlikely to be clinically meaningful. Across the four studies (V114–025, V114–026, V114–029, V114–031), vaccine-related SAEs occurred in four participants after V114 (all due to pyrexia) and three participants after PCV13 (two due pyrexia, one due to febrile convulsion). No vaccine-related deaths occurred and only one study discontinuation due to a vaccine-related AE occurred in each group (V114 and PCV13). Finally, no new or unexpected AEs were reported after the administration of V114. An integrated safety summary (ISS) of infants that includes data from V114–025, participants from V114–027 who received a complete vaccination series of V114 or PCV13 (interchangeability study of V114 and PCV13, described below), V114–029, and V114–031 (V114–026 was not included since the study was not complete at the time of the analysis) is shown in . Of note is that three of the vaccine-related SAEs discussed above (two after V114 and one after PCV13) occurred in the V114–026 study and therefore are not reported in .

Figure 1. Safety profile of V114 in healthy infants after any study vaccine dose across 4 studies (V114–025, −027, −029, and − 031). For V114–027, groups 1 (complete PCV13 regimen) and 5 (complete V114 regimen) were used for this analysis. Top: the number (n) and proportion (%) of participants included in each safety category. Bottom: solicited AE summary, with proportions of participants experiencing an AE and intensity in the stacked bar in the V114 (P15) and PCV13 (P13) groups. The 2 deaths that occurred in recipients of V114 were due to complications from congenital heart disease and a craniocerebral injury following a motor vehicle accident.

Figure 1. Safety profile of V114 in healthy infants after any study vaccine dose across 4 studies (V114–025, −027, −029, and − 031). For V114–027, groups 1 (complete PCV13 regimen) and 5 (complete V114 regimen) were used for this analysis. Top: the number (n) and proportion (%) of participants included in each safety category. Bottom: solicited AE summary, with proportions of participants experiencing an AE and intensity in the stacked bar in the V114 (P15) and PCV13 (P13) groups. The 2 deaths that occurred in recipients of V114 were due to complications from congenital heart disease and a craniocerebral injury following a motor vehicle accident.

Daily maximum temperature measurements were solicited via the eVRC for 7 days following each study vaccination, and days 8–14 if fever was suspected, to monitor for elevated temperatures. Across the studies in the ISS, the majority of participants had a maximum temperature below 39.0°C, and a low proportion of participants (<0.5%) reported maximum temperatures at/above 40.0°C after any study vaccination. The distribution of maximum temperature measurements was comparable between vaccination groups across all studies.

Pyrexia was an unsolicited AE in the program. In the ISS (V114–025, V114–027, V114–029, and V114–031), the rates of the AE of pyrexia were comparable between groups (37.7% [1354/3589] in V114 group, 36.5% [752/2058] in PCV13 group), as well as cases of pyrexia that classified as SAEs (0.3% [11/3589] in V114 group and 0.2% [5/2058] in PCV13 group). Of these, three were considered vaccine-related SAEs, two in the V114 group, and one in the PCV13 group. Per regulatory definitions, these cases were classified as SAEs due to hospitalization of the participant. None of these cases reported a temperature higher than 40.0°C and all were confounded with the concomitant administration of routine pediatric vaccinations. None of the reported vaccine-related SAEs of pyrexia in the V114 group resulted in febrile convulsion. Moreover, the rate of convulsions and febrile convulsions were comparable between arms (0.2% in V114 group and 0.2% in PCV13 group).

Taken together, these data demonstrate that V114 is well tolerated in infants and toddlers, with a comparable safety profile to PCV13.

2.2.2. Immunogenicity

In the 2 + 1 studies, V114 met noninferiority criteria for each of the 13 shared serotypes and superiority criteria for serotypes 22F and 33F, based on IgG response rates and IgG GMC ratios at 30 days PTD as compared to PCV13. In the 3 + 1 study, noninferiority (for all 15 serotypes) and superiority (for serotypes 3, 22F, and 33F) assessments were made at PPS and PTD. V114 met noninferiority criteria for all 15 serotypes at PTD based on IgG GMC, and for all 15 serotypes based on IgG response rates and IgG GMC at PPS, except serotype 6A IgG GMC which narrowly missed the margin by 0.02 (the lower bound of the confidence interval for V114/PCV13 GMC ratio for serotype 6A was 0.48 with a noninferiority cutoff of 0.50). Superiority criteria were met at PPS (for response rates and IgG GMC ratios) and PTD (IgG GMC ratios) for the unique serotypes 22F and 33F, and the shared serotype 3 [Citation87]. In all three pivotal studies, V114 induced robust functional antibodies as measured by OPA to each of the 15 serotypes, at levels which were generally comparable to PCV13 for the 13 shared serotypes and higher for serotypes 22F and 33F, at PPS and PTD. Serotype-specific antibody levels from PPS to prior to the toddler dose waned and then showed boosting PTD, suggesting development of vaccine-induced immune memory. This was true for both 2 + 1 and 3 + 1 vaccination regimens. From these data, it is expected that V114 will be protective for the 15 serotypes included in the vaccine. Importantly, V114 broadens PCV coverage without significant loss of immunogenicity and has improved immunogenicity against serotype 3. Favorable safety and immunogenicity results at PPS from the 3 + 1 study are also informative for PCV recommendations in regions where a 3 + 0 vaccination regimen is used.

2.3. V114 catch-up vaccination and interchangeability

Interchangeability of V114 with PCV13 [Citation90] and catch-up vaccination with V114 [Citation91] were evaluated in two studies. The WHO recommends catch-up vaccination as soon as possible for infants and children who are delayed for any reason in completing the pediatric PCV series [Citation92]. Catch-up vaccination was evaluated in 606 participants composed of three age cohorts: 7–11 months (pneumococcal vaccine naïve, received a 3-dose PCV regimen), 12–23 months (PCV naïve, received a 2-dose V114 regimen), and 2–17 years of age (PCV experienced or naïve, received a single V114 dose). Overall, the proportion, duration, and intensity of AEs were similar between groups and no vaccine-related SAEs and/or deaths were reported, demonstrating that V114 was well tolerated. At 30 days after the last PCV dose in all age cohorts, V114 generated robust immune responses to each of the 15 serotypes as assessed by IgG GMCs and response rates, which were comparable to PCV13 for the shared serotypes and higher for serotypes 22F and 33F.

Switching from PCV13 to V114 mid-schedule was evaluated at each of the four doses in the 3 + 1 vaccination regimen in 900 healthy infants. The safety profile of mixed dosing schedules or a complete V114 dosing schedule, including the proportions of participants with AEs, was comparable to participants who received a full 4-dose series of PCV13. No V114-related SAEs occurred during the study, and no deaths were reported. One vaccine-related SAE was reported in the PCV13 group. Immunogenicity data, including serotype-specific response rates and IgG GMCs, were generally comparable for all groups of shared serotypes. Interestingly, the interchangeability study design allowed for the evaluation of immune responses to serotypes 22F and 33F after increasing doses of V114. As shown by response rates, IgG GMCs, and reverse cumulative distribution curves, higher antibodies to both serotypes were observed when at least a single dose of V114 was administered during the infant series and at the toddler age. A single dose of V114 during either the infant primary series or the toddler booster dose was sufficient to induce near-maximal IgG levels against serotype 22F, while serotype 33F immunogenicity increased incrementally with the number of V114 doses received. As has been shown in studies of prior PCVs, individual vaccine serotypes can differ in their immunogenicity profile and the number of doses needed for peak response [Citation93,Citation94].

2.4. V114 concomitant use with other routine pediatric vaccines

In prior PCV development programs, PCVs have been shown to have minimal impact on the immunogenicity of concomitantly administered routine pediatric vaccines [Citation95–98]. While concomitant routine pediatric vaccine administration was allowed throughout the V114 Phase 3 program, four studies had pre-specified noninferiority hypotheses regarding immunogenicity of concomitantly administered study vaccines with V114 [Citation87–90]. Concomitant study vaccines tested included pentavalent and hexavalent combination vaccines, rotavirus vaccine, hepatitis A and B vaccines, MMR vaccine, varicella vaccine, and Hib vaccine. Immune responses at PPS and PTD to all vaccine antigens tested in the Phase 3 program had noninferior immunogenicity when co-administered with V114 compared to co-administration with PCV13 (summary in ). These data demonstrate that V114 can be given as part of the pediatric vaccination schedule without interference with the tolerability and immunogenicity of other routine pediatric vaccines.

Table 2. Summary of concomitant vaccine immunogenicity assessments from PCV15 studies using 3 + 1 and 2 + 1 vaccination regimens.

2.5. V114 in at-risk populations

Infants and children with sickle cell disease (SCD) are at increased risk of IPD [Citation99–102], and IPD due to serotypes 22F and 33F contribute to residual IPD in individuals with SCD [Citation103]. Although relatively understudied compared to healthy children, pneumococcal vaccines have been shown to be immunogenic in children with SCD [Citation104–107]. For V114, the safety and immunogenicity of a single vaccination was evaluated in 104 children 5–17 years of age with SCD [Citation108]. V114 was well tolerated, with a safety profile generally comparable to PCV13. No vaccine-related SAEs were reported, and no deaths occurred during the study. A single dose of V114 induced serotype-specific immune responses (compared to baseline prior to vaccination) to all 15 serotypes; IgG GMCs and OPA GMTs against the 13 shared serotypes were comparable to PCV13 and higher for serotypes 22F and 33F. Although PCV was not followed up with PPSV23 in this study as is recommended for children with SCD, other studies have supported the use of V114 followed by PPSV23 in at-risk populations [Citation68,Citation109].

Children living with HIV are highly vulnerable to IPD compared to healthy children, even on anti-retroviral therapy with undetectable viremia [Citation110–112]. Similar to children with SCD, a sequential vaccination strategy is often recommended for children with HIV, in which vaccination with PCV is followed by vaccination with PPSV23 for broader pneumococcal serotype coverage. The safety and immunogenicity of V114 or PCV13 followed 8 weeks later by PPSV23 was evaluated in 407 children with HIV receiving mono or combination anti-retroviral therapies [Citation109]. Administration of V114 followed by PPSV23 was well tolerated in the study. There was a numerically higher proportion of participants who reported vaccine-related AEs in the V114 group (78.3%) compared to the PCV13 group (67.2%). However, the majority of AEs in both groups were of mild-to-moderate intensity and of short duration. The proportions of participants with SAEs were comparable between groups, and no V114-related SAEs or deaths were reported. Immunogenicity to all 13 shared serotypes was induced following V114, and these levels were maintained or increased after PPSV23. Serotypes 22F and 33F were higher after V114 and maintained or increased after PPSV23, suggesting earlier protective immunogenicity in this population. Overall, these data support the use of V114 in HIV-infected children.

Preterm infants (less than 37 weeks gestation) have up to three times the risk of IPD compared to full-term infants [Citation113]. As an objective in the Phase 3 program, a proportion of healthy infants enrolled in 4 V114 studies were preterm infants, and a subsequent pooled secondary analysis was performed on these data to evaluate safety and tolerability of V114 in this population. A total of 354 preterm infants were vaccinated using a 3 + 1 regimen with either V114 or PCV13. Proportions of participants with AEs, vaccine-related AEs, and SAEs were comparable between groups. Pyrexia occurred in 37.4% of V114 recipients and 47.2% of PCV13 recipients, and only three participants recorded a maximum temperature of >40.0°C after any dose (2 in the V114 group, 1 in the PCV13 group). No V114-related SAEs occurred in preterm infants, and no deaths occurred. As assessed by serotype-specific IgG GMCs and OPA GMTs, V114 induced comparable immune responses to the 13 shared serotypes and higher responses to serotypes 22F and 33F in preterm infants. These data demonstrate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of V114 in preterm infants.

3. Expert opinion

V114 is a valuable modern PCV in the fight to prevent IPD globally. The safety and immunogenicity profiles in infants and children are favorable and will provide broader pneumococcal serotype coverage without increased reactogenicity. V114 is interchangeable with PCV13, can be safely administered with other routine pediatric vaccines, and is well tolerated and immunogenic in several at-risk populations, thereby facilitating a seamless integration into existing pediatric immunization programs. The focus of the Phase 3 program on at-risk populations and the geographic diversity in site selection is a specific strength in the development of V114 and provides confidence in the use of V114 in individuals with a variety of preexisting conditions and backgrounds. The expected added coverage from inclusion of serotypes 22F and 33F will be highly beneficial in most regions globally where these are prominent non-vaccine serotypes causing IPD.

An important consideration for the development of new PCVs is providing broader serotype coverage while also providing robust immunogenicity to all serotypes contained in the vaccine. Some serotypes contained in current PCVs, including 3, 19A, and 19F, remain major causes of disease even in individuals fully vaccinated with a PCV that includes these serotypes. Serotype 3 currently leads in vaccine-type residual disease globally. Therefore, there is caution warranted in projections of new PCV effectiveness based simply on the serotypes contained in the vaccine. The V114 development program aimed at improving immunogenicity to serotype 3 which was successful and resulted in higher vaccine-induced immune responses compared to PCV13 across pediatric and adult populations. This outcome demonstrates that optimization of PCVs for increased immunogenicity against problematic serotypes is possible and adds anticipation to future real-world evidence studies of V114 effectiveness against disease caused by serotype 3. It remains unknown whether a focused approach such as the one used with V114 for serotype 3 could be employed to improve immunogenicity and subsequent vaccine effectiveness against other recalcitrant serotypes such as 19A and 19F. This should remain an important consideration in the development of new PCVs while also engineering for broader coverage. While alternative approaches to pneumococcal vaccine design are currently in development using novel carrier proteins, novel adjuvants, and protein-based or whole-cell platforms, it is unknown whether any of these can improve on the current most widely used approach while also maintaining a favorable safety and tolerability profile.

With the licensure of V114 and more recently PCV20, the global use of PCVs will change and therefore with it the epidemiology of pneumococcal diseases. It is possible that these changes will result in a significant impact on antimicrobial resistance among pneumococci globally as more serotypes are targeted with newer vaccines. There is an associated opportunity within national immunization programs as the options for the prevention of pneumococcal disease are expanded. While all currently licensed pneumococcal vaccines are projected to be cost effective, cost variation between pneumococcal vaccines can affect decision-making at the national level. Cost-effective, broad protection is now available in newer PCVs, while established vaccines such as PPSV23, for children 2 years and older, and PCV10 still offer benefits at a lower price point. Global access to effective pneumococcal vaccines should be a continued priority as the complexity and associated development cost of current generation vaccines change.

In conclusion, it is an exciting time for pneumococcal vaccines and the hope of more complete protection against PD to prevent morbidity and mortality from pneumococcal infections. With a favorable safety and tolerability profile and robust immunogenicity results coupled with broad pneumococcal serotype coverage, V114 is well positioned to advance prevention of pneumococcal disease globally.

Article highlights

  • PCV15 (V114) is a 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine approved in infants, children, and adults for the prevention of pneumonia, AOM, and invasive pneumococcal disease

  • This review summarizes the V114 pediatric phase 3 clinical program that included trials in healthy infants and children as well individuals with at-risk conditions, using 2 + 1 and 3 + 1 immunization schedules

  • V114 was well tolerated in all studies, with a safety profile similar to the active comparator PCV13

  • V114 demonstrated non-inferior immunogenicity to PCV13 for the 13 shared serotypes, and superior immunogenicity for shared serotype 3 and V114 serotypes 22F and 33F

  • With a strong safety and immunogenicity profile in infants and children, V114 is expected to maintain protection offered by PCV13 while further reducing pneumococcal disease against additional epidemiologically important serotypes

Declaration of interest

T.J. Chapman, A.M. Houston, G. Tamms, R. Lupinacci, K Feemster, U.K. Buchwald, and N. Banniettis are employees of MSD and may hold stock in Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, U.S.A.. L.O. received investigator-initiated grants from Merck Investigator Studies Program and was an investigator on pneumococcal vaccine clinical trials sponsored by Merck, Pfizer, and Sanofi; research funds for all these activities were provided to her institution. G. Dbaibo received honoraria from MSD, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Abbott for speaking engagements and Advisory Board memberships, as well as research grants paid to the institution from Pfizer and Sanofi. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or material discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Reviewer disclosures

A peer reviewer on this manuscript is an employee of GSK. Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no other relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the conception, design, or planning and/or the interpretation of the results and drafting of the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed or revised the manuscript for important intellectual content, approved the final manuscript as submitted, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge all the study participants and their families, study staff, and investigators who contributed to the V114 pediatric program. Editorial support was provided by Karyn Davis (MSD).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by MSD.

References

  • De Schutter I, Vergison A, Tuerlinckx D, et al. Pneumococcal aetiology and serotype distribution in paediatric community-acquired pneumonia. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e89013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089013
  • Mackenzie GA, Hill PC, Gambia Pneumococcal Surveillance Group. Impact of the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccination on invasive pneumococcal disease and pneumonia in the Gambia: 10 years of population-based surveillance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;21(9):1293–1302.
  • Jain S, Williams DJ, Arnold SR, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among U.S. children. N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 26;372(9):835–845. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1405870
  • Marom T, Alvarez-Fernandez PE, Jennings K, et al. Acute bacterial sinusitis complicating viral upper respiratory tract infection in young children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014 Aug;33(8):803–808.
  • Ngo CC, Massa HM, Thornton RB, et al. Predominant bacteria detected from the middle ear fluid of children experiencing otitis media: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0150949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150949
  • Wahl B, O’Brien KL, Greenbaum A, et al. Burden of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae type b disease in children in the era of conjugate vaccines: global, regional, and national estimates for 2000-15. Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Jul;6(7):e744–e757.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Active bacterial core surveillance (ABCs) report. Emerging infections program network. Streptococcus pneumonia. 2018 [cited 2023 Mar 29]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/abcs/reports-finds/surv-reports.html
  • Fenoll A, Jado I, Vicioso D, et al. Streptococcus pneumoniae in children in Spain: 1990-1999. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2000 Dec;89(435):44–50.
  • Hausdorff WP, Bryant J, Kloek C, et al. The contribution of specific pneumococcal serogroups to different disease manifestations: implications for conjugate vaccine formulation and use, part II. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Jan;30(1):122–140.
  • Musher DM, Anderson R, Feldman C. The remarkable history of pneumococcal vaccination: an ongoing challenge. Pneumonia. 2022 Sep 25;14(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41479-022-00097-y
  • Anderson P, Pichichero ME, Insel RA. Immunogens consisting of oligosaccharides from the capsule of Haemophilus influenzae type b coupled to diphtheria toxoid or the toxin protein CRM197. J Clin Invest. 1985 Jul;76(1):52–59. doi: 10.1172/JCI111976
  • American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Infectious Diseases. Policy statement: recommendations for the prevention of pneumococcal infections, including the use of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Prevnar), pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine, and antibiotic prophylaxis. Pediatrics. 2000 Aug;106(2 Pt 1):362–366. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.2.362
  • Dagan R, Givon-Lavi N, Fraser D, et al. Serum serotype-specific pneumococcal anticapsular immunoglobulin g concentrations after immunization with a 9-valent conjugate pneumococcal vaccine correlate with nasopharyngeal acquisition of pneumococcus. J Infect Dis. 2005 Aug 1;192(3):367–376. doi: 10.1086/431679
  • Jokinen JT, Ahman H, Kilpi TM, et al. Concentration of antipneumococcal antibodies as a serological correlate of protection: an application to acute otitis media. J Infect Dis. 2004 Aug 1;190(3):545–550. doi: 10.1086/422531
  • Pilishvili T, Lexau C, Farley MM, et al. Sustained reductions in invasive pneumococcal disease in the era of conjugate vaccine. J Infect Dis. 2010 Jan 1;201(1):32–41. doi: 10.1086/648593
  • Simonsen L, Taylor RJ, Young-Xu Y, et al. Impact of pneumococcal conjugate vaccination of infants on pneumonia and influenza hospitalization and mortality in all age groups in the United States. MBio. 2011 Jan 25;2(1):e00309–10. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00309-10
  • Agency EM Synflorix, pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (adsorbed): summary of product characteristics. [cited 2023 Apr 21]. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000973/WC500054346.pdf
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Licensure of a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and recommendations for use among children - Advisory Committee on immunization Practices (ACIP), 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Mar 12;59(9):258–261.
  • World Health Organization. Prequalified vaccines. Pneumosil®. 2019 [cited 2023 Jun]. Available from: https://extranet.who.int/pqweb/content/pneumosil%C2%AE
  • Kobayashi M, Farrar JL, Gierke R, et al. Use of 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine among U.S. Adults: Updated recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices - United States, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jan 28;71(4):109–117. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7104a1
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Vaccines. Prevnar 20. [cited 2023 Jun]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/prevnar-20
  • Baxter R, Aukes L, Pelton SI, et al. Impact of the 13-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine on Invasive Pneumococcal Disease After Introduction Into Routine Pediatric Use. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2021 Mar 26;10(2):141–150. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piaa035
  • Berman-Rosa M, O’Donnell S, Barker M, et al. Efficacy and effectiveness of the PCV-10 and PCV-13 vaccines against invasive pneumococcal disease. Pediatrics. 2020 Apr;145(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-0377
  • Ciruela P, Izquierdo C, Broner S, et al. The changing epidemiology of invasive pneumococcal disease after PCV13 vaccination in a country with intermediate vaccination coverage. Vaccine. 2018 Nov 29;36(50):7744–7752. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.026
  • de Miguel S, Domenech M, Gonzalez-Camacho F, et al. Nationwide trends of invasive pneumococcal disease in Spain from 2009 Through 2019 in children and adults during the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine era. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):e3778–e3787. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1483
  • Naucler P, Galanis I, Morfeldt E, et al. Comparison of the Impact of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine 10 or Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine 13 on Invasive Pneumococcal Disease in Equivalent Populations. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 13;65(11):1780–1789. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix685
  • Rinta-Kokko H, Palmu AA, Auranen K, et al. Long-term impact of 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccination on invasive pneumococcal disease among children in Finland. Vaccine. 2018 Apr 5;36(15):1934–1940. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.03.001
  • Savulescu C, Krizova P, Lepoutre A, et al. Effect of high-valency pneumococcal conjugate vaccines on invasive pneumococcal disease in children in SpIDnet countries: an observational multicentre study. Lancet Respir Med. 2017 Aug;5(8):648–656.
  • Waight PA, Andrews NJ, Ladhani SN, et al. Effect of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on invasive pneumococcal disease in England and Wales 4 years after its introduction: an observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 May;15(5):535–543.
  • Ben-Shimol S, Givon-Lavi N, Leibovitz E, et al. Impact of widespread introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines on pneumococcal and nonpneumococcal otitis media. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 1;63(5):611–618. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw347
  • de Oliveira LH, Shioda K, Valenzuela MT, et al. Declines in pneumonia mortality following the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in Latin American and Caribbean countries. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 15;73(2):306–313. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa614
  • Gonullu E, Soysal A, Yildiz I, et al. Impact of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on the incidences of community-acquired pneumonia and pneumonia-related hospitalizations in children </=5 years after its implementation into the national immunization program of turkey. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 Oct 2;16(10):2504–2508. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1727212
  • Mackenzie GA, Hill PC, Sahito SM, et al. Impact of the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccination on pneumonia in the Gambia: population-based surveillance and case-control studies. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Sep;17(9):965–973.
  • Olarte L, Barson WJ, Barson RM, et al. Pneumococcal Pneumonia Requiring Hospitalization in US Children in the 13-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Era. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jun 15;64(12):1699–1704. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix115
  • Reyburn R, Tuivaga E, Nguyen CD, et al. Effect of ten-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine introduction on pneumonia hospital admissions in Fiji: a time-series analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Jan;9(1):e91–e98.
  • Ben-Shimol S, Greenberg D, Givon-Lavi N, et al. Early impact of sequential introduction of 7-valent and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on IPD in Israeli children <5 years: an active prospective nationwide surveillance. Vaccine. 2014 Jun 5;32(27):3452–3459. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.03.065
  • Gisselsson-Solen M. Trends in Otitis Media Incidence After Conjugate Pneumococcal Vaccination: A National Observational Study. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017 Nov;36(11):1027–1031. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001654
  • Rosenblut A, Rosenblut M, Garcia K, et al. Frequency of acute otitis media in children under 24 months of age before and after the introduction of the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine into the national immunization program in Chile. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018 Feb;37(2):132–134.
  • Sartori AL, Minamisava R, Bierrenbach AL, et al. Reduction in all-cause otitis media-related outpatient visits in children after PCV10 introduction in Brazil. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179222
  • Suaya JA, Gessner BD, Fung S, et al. Acute otitis media, antimicrobial prescriptions, and medical expenses among children in the United States during 2011-2016. Vaccine. 2018 Nov 26;36(49):7479–7486. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.060
  • Chang B, Akeda H, Nakamura Y, et al. Impact of thirteen-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on nasopharyngeal carriage in healthy children under 24 months in Okinawa, Japan. J Infect Chemother. 2020 May;26(5):465–470.
  • Davis SM, Deloria-Knoll M, Kassa HT, et al. Impact of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines on nasopharyngeal carriage and invasive disease among unvaccinated people: review of evidence on indirect effects. Vaccine. 2013 Dec 17;32(1):133–145. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.05.005
  • Felix S, Handem S, Nunes S, et al. Impact of private use of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) on pneumococcal carriage among Portuguese children living in urban and rural regions. Vaccine. 2021 Jul 22;39(32):4524–4533. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.06.035
  • Lovlie A, Vestrheim DF, Aaberge IS, et al. Changes in pneumococcal carriage prevalence and factors associated with carriage in Norwegian children, four years after introduction of PCV13. BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Jan 10;20(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4754-0
  • Palmu AA, Toropainen M, Kaijalainen T, et al. Direct and indirect effectiveness of the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine against carriage in a cluster randomized trial. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017 Dec;36(12):1193–1200.
  • Dagan R. Relationship between immune response to pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in infants and indirect protection after vaccine implementation. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2019 Jun;18(6):641–661. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2019.1627207
  • Andrade AL, Afonso ET, Minamisava R, et al. Direct and indirect impact of 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine introduction on pneumonia hospitalizations and economic burden in all age-groups in Brazil: a time-series analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0184204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184204
  • Izu A, Solomon F, Nzenze SA, et al. Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines and hospitalization of children for pneumonia: a time-series analysis, South Africa, 2006-2014. Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Sep 1;95(9):618–628. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.187849
  • Lopez EL, Glatstein E, Ezcurra GC, et al. Rapid Decrease in Rates of Hospitalization Resulting From Invasive Pneumococcal Disease and Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Children Aged <60 Months After 13-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Introduction in Argentina. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2018 Feb 19;7(1):30–35. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piw089
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Global pneumococcal disease and vaccination. 2022 [cited 2023 May 1]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/pneumococcal/global.html
  • Balsells E, Guillot L, Nair H, et al. Serotype distribution of Streptococcus pneumoniae causing invasive disease in children in the post-PCV era: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177113
  • Gagetti P, Lo SW, Hawkins PA, et al. Population genetic structure, serotype distribution and antibiotic resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae causing invasive disease in children in Argentina. Microb Genom. 2021 Sep;7(9). doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000636
  • Garcia Quesada M, Yang Y, Bennett JC, et al. Serotype distribution of remaining pneumococcal meningitis in the mature PCV10/13 period: findings from the PSERENADE project. Microorganisms. 2021 Apr 1;9(4). doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9040738
  • Peckeu L, van der Ende A, de Melker HE, et al. Impact and effectiveness of the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on invasive pneumococcal disease among children under 5 years of age in the Netherlands. Vaccine. 2021 Jan 8;39(2):431–437. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.11.018
  • Wijayasri S, Hillier K, Lim GH, et al. The shifting epidemiology and serotype distribution of invasive pneumococcal disease in Ontario, Canada, 2007-2017. PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0226353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226353
  • Harboe ZB, Dalby T, Weinberger DM, et al. Impact of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccination in invasive pneumococcal disease incidence and mortality. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Oct 15;59(8):1066–1073. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu524
  • Lapidot R, Shea KM, Yildirim I, et al. Characteristics of serotype 3 invasive pneumococcal disease before and after universal childhood immunization with PCV13 in Massachusetts. Pathogens. 2020 May 21;9(5). doi: 10.3390/pathogens9050396
  • Reslan L, Youssef N, Boutros CF, et al. The impact of vaccination on the burden of invasive pneumococcal disease from a nationwide surveillance program in Lebanon: an unexpected increase in mortality driven by non-vaccine serotypes. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2022 Dec;21(12):1905–1921.
  • Grant LR, Slack MPE, Theilacker C, et al. Distribution of serotypes causing invasive pneumococcal disease in children from high-Income countries and the Impact of pediatric pneumococcal vaccination. Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 8;76(3):e1062–e1070. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac475
  • Bertran M, Amin-Chowdhury Z, Sheppard CL, et al. Increased Incidence of Invasive Pneumococcal Disease among Children after COVID-19 Pandemic, England. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022 Aug;28(8):1669–1672.
  • Perniciaro S, van der Linden M, Weinberger DM. Reemergence of invasive pneumococcal disease in Germany during the Spring and Summer of 2021. Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 30;75(7):1149–1153. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac100
  • Babb R, Doyle CR, Pirofski LA. Isolation and Characterization of Human Monoclonal Antibodies to Pneumococcal Capsular Polysaccharide 3. Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0144621. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.01446-21
  • Choi EH, Zhang F, Lu YJ, et al. Capsular polysaccharide (CPS) release by serotype 3 pneumococcal strains reduces the protective Effect of anti-type 3 CPS antibodies. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2016 Feb;23(2):162–167.
  • Micoli F, Romano MR, Carboni F, et al. Strengths and weaknesses of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. Glycoconj J. 2023 Apr;40(2):135–148.
  • Greenberg D, Hoover PA, Vesikari T, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV15) in healthy infants. Vaccine. 2018 Oct 29;36(45):6883–6891. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.02.113
  • Rupp R, Hurley D, Grayson S, et al. A dose ranging study of 2 different formulations of 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV15) in healthy infants. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(3):549–559. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1568159
  • Hammitt LL, Quinn D, Janczewska E, et al. Immunogenicity, Safety, and Tolerability of V114, a 15-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine, in Immunocompetent Adults Aged 18-49 Years With or Without Risk Factors for Pneumococcal Disease: A Randomized Phase 3 Trial (PNEU-DAY). Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Mar;9(3):ofab605.
  • Hammitt LL, Quinn D, Janczewska E, et al. Phase 3 trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of V114, a 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, followed by 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine 6 months later, in at-risk adults 18-49 years of age (PNEU-DAY): a subgroup analysis by baseline risk factors. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Dec 31;19(1):2177066. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2177066
  • Kishino H, Sawata M, Igarashi R, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of V114, a 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, compared with 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in Japanese adults aged >/=65 years: subgroup analysis of a randomized Phase III trial (PNEU-AGE). Jpn J Infect Dis. 2022 Nov 22;75(6):575–582. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2022.060
  • Mohapi L, Pinedo Y, Osiyemi O, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of V114, a 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, in adults living with HIV. AIDS. 2022 Mar 1;36(3):373–382. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003126
  • Platt HL, Cardona JF, Haranaka M, et al. A phase 3 trial of safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of V114, 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, compared with 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in adults 50 years of age and older (PNEU-AGE). Vaccine. 2022 Jan 3;40(1):162–172. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.049
  • Severance R, Schwartz H, Dagan R, et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of V114, a 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, administered concomitantly with influenza vaccine in healthy adults aged >/=50 years: a randomized phase 3 trial (PNEU-FLU). Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Dec 31;18(1):1–14. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1976581
  • Song JY, Chang CJ, Andrews C, et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of V114, a 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, followed by sequential PPSV23 vaccination in healthy adults aged >/=50 years: a randomized phase III trial (PNEU-PATH). Vaccine. 2021 Oct 15;39(43):6422–6436. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.038
  • Platt HL, Greenberg D, Tapiero B, et al. A Phase II trial of safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of V114, a 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, compared with 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in healthy infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020 Aug;39(8):763–770.
  • Administration Fa D VAXNEUVANCE™ (pneumococcal 15-valent conjugate vaccine) prescribing information. 2022 Jul. [cited 2022 Aug 10]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/vaxneuvance
  • Agency EM. Vaxneuvance: summary of product characteristics. 2022 Nov. [cited 2023 Apr 21]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/vaxneuvance-epar-product-information_en.pdf
  • Canada G Pneumococcal vaccine: Canadian immunization guide. [cited 2023 Apr 21]. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/healthy-living/canadian-immunization-guide-part-4-active-vaccines/page-16-pneumococcal-vaccine.html#a4
  • Compendium EM. Vaxneuvance. Oct 2022. [cited 2023 Apr 21]. Available from: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/13754/smpc#gref
  • World Health Organization. WHO Expert committee on biological standardization: seventy-fifth report. WHO Technical Report Series, No. 1043. 2022.
  • Anttila M, Voutilainen M, Jantti V, et al. Contribution of serotype-specific IgG concentration, IgG subclasses and relative antibody avidity to opsonophagocytic activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Clin Exp Immunol. 1999 Dec;118(3):402–407.
  • Romero-Steiner S, Libutti D, Pais LB, et al. Standardization of an opsonophagocytic assay for the measurement of functional antibody activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae using differentiated HL-60 cells. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1997 Jul;4(4):415–422.
  • Kieninger DM, Kueper K, Steul K, et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunologic noninferiority of a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine compared to a 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine given with routine pediatric vaccinations in Germany. Vaccine. 2010 Jun 7;28(25):4192–4203. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.04.008
  • Yeh SH, Gurtman A, Hurley DC, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in infants and toddlers. Pediatrics. 2010 Sep;126(3):e493–505.
  • Nolan KM, Bonhomme ME, Schier CJ, et al. Optimization and validation of a microcolony multiplexed opsonophagocytic killing assay for 15 pneumococcal serotypes. Bioanalysis. 2020 Jul;12(14):1003–1020.
  • Nolan KM, Zhang Y, Antonello JM, et al. Enhanced antipneumococcal antibody electrochemiluminescence assay: validation and bridging to the WHO reference ELISA. Bioanalysis. 2020 Oct;12(19):1363–1375.
  • Burton RL, Nahm MH. Development and validation of a fourfold multiplexed opsonization assay (MOPA4) for pneumococcal antibodies. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2006 Sep;13(9):1004–1009. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00112-06
  • Lupinacci R, Rupp R, Wittawatmongkol O, et al. A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-comparator-controlled study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a 4-dose regimen of V114, a 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, in healthy infants (PNEU-PED). Vaccine. 2023 Jan 27;41(5):1142–1152. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.054
  • Benfield T, Ramet M, Valentini P, et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of V114 pneumococcal vaccine compared with PCV13 in a 2+1 regimen in healthy infants: a phase III study (PNEU-PED-EU-2). Vaccine. 2023 Apr 6;41(15):2456–2465. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.041
  • Martinon-Torres F, Wysocki J, Szenborn L, et al. A Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active comparator-controlled study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of V114 compared with PCV13 in healthy infants (PNEU-PED-EU-1). Vaccine. 2023 May 16;41(21):3387–3398. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.04.036
  • Bili A, Dobson S, Quinones J, et al. A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the interchangeability of V114, a 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, and PCV13 with respect to safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity in healthy infants (PNEU-DIRECTION). Vaccine. 2023 Jan 16;41(3):657–665. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.072
  • Banniettis N, Wysocki J, Szenborn L, et al. A phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active comparator-controlled study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of catch-up vaccination regimens of V114, a 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, in healthy infants, children, and adolescents (PNEU-PLAN). Vaccine. 2022 Oct 19;40(44):6315–6325. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.09.003
  • World Health Organization. Weekly epidemiological report, pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in infants and children under 5 years of age. WHO Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2019;94(8):85–104.
  • Melin M, Trzcinski K, Antonio M, et al. Serotype-related variation in susceptibility to complement deposition and opsonophagocytosis among clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect Immun. 2010 Dec;78(12):5252–5261.
  • Spijkerman J, Veenhoven RH, Wijmenga-Monsuur AJ, et al. Immunogenicity of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine administered according to 4 different primary immunization schedules in infants: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013 Sep 4;310(9):930–937. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.228052
  • Bermal N, Szenborn L, Chrobot A, et al. The 10-valent pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV) coadministered with DTPw-HBV/Hib and poliovirus vaccines: assessment of immunogenicity. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 Apr;28(4 Suppl):S89–96.
  • Chevallier B, Vesikari T, Brzostek J, et al. Safety and reactogenicity of the 10-valent pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV) when coadministered with routine childhood vaccines. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 Apr;28(4 Suppl):S109–118.
  • Esposito S, Tansey S, Thompson A, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine compared to those of a 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine given as a three-dose series with routine vaccines in healthy infants and toddlers. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010 Jun;17(6):1017–1026.
  • Knuf M, Szenborn L, Moro M, et al. Immunogenicity of routinely used childhood vaccines when coadministered with the 10-valent pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV). Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 Apr;28(4 Suppl):S97–S108.
  • Adamkiewicz TV, Sarnaik S, Buchanan GR, et al. Invasive pneumococcal infections in children with sickle cell disease in the era of penicillin prophylaxis, antibiotic resistance, and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination. J Pediatr. 2003 Oct;143(4):438–444.
  • Al-Tawfiq JA, Rabaan AA, AlEdreesi MH. Frequency of bacteremia in patients with sickle cell disease: a longitudinal study. Ann Hematol. 2021 Jun;100(6):1411–1416. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04523-x
  • Battersby AJ, Knox-Macaulay HH, Carrol ED. Susceptibility to invasive bacterial infections in children with sickle cell disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010 Sep;55(3):401–406. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22461
  • Oligbu G, Fallaha M, Pay L, et al. Risk of invasive pneumococcal disease in children with sickle cell disease in the era of conjugate vaccines: a systematic review of the literature. Br J Haematol. 2019 May;185(4):743–751.
  • Adamkiewicz T, Thomas S, Tunali A, et al. Population-based surveillance of pneumococcal infections in children with sickle cell disease before and after Prevnar 7® and Prevnar 13® licensure: implications for expanded vaccination. Blood. 2021;138(Supplement 1):763–763. doi: 10.1182/blood-2021-154474
  • Adamkiewicz TV, Silk BJ, Howgate J, et al. Effectiveness of the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children with sickle cell disease in the first decade of life. Pediatrics. 2008 Mar;121(3):562–569.
  • De Montalembert M, Abboud MR, Fiquet A, et al. 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) is immunogenic and safe in children 6-17 years of age with sickle cell disease previously vaccinated with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23): results of a phase 3 study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015 Aug;62(8):1427–1436.
  • McCavit TL, Xuan L, Zhang S, et al. Hospitalization for invasive pneumococcal disease in a national sample of children with sickle cell disease before and after PCV7 licensure. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012 Jun;58(6):945–949.
  • Nuorti JP, Whitney CG, Centers for Disease C, et al. Prevention of pneumococcal disease among infants and children - use of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine - recommendations of the Advisory Committee on immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010 Dec 10;59(RR–11):1–18.
  • Quinn CT, Wiedmann RT, Jarovsky D, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of V114, a 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, in children with SCD: a V114-023 (PNEU-SICKLE) study. Blood Adv. 2023 Feb 14;7(3):414–421. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008037
  • Wilck M, Barnabas S, Chokephaibulkit K, et al. A phase 3 study of safety and immunogenicity of V114, a 15-valent PCV, followed by PPSV23, in children living with HIV. AIDS. 2023 Mar 20;37(8):1227–1237. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003551
  • Madhi SA, Petersen K, Madhi A, et al. Increased disease burden and antibiotic resistance of bacteria causing severe community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Jul;31(1):170–176.
  • Meiring S, Cohen C, Quan V, et al. HIV infection and the epidemiology of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in South African adults and older children prior to the introduction of a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV). PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0149104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149104
  • Nunes MC, von Gottberg A, de Gouveia L, et al. The impact of antiretroviral treatment on the burden of invasive pneumococcal disease in South African children: a time series analysis. AIDS. 2011 Feb 20;25(4):453–462. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328341b7f1
  • Kent A, Makwana A, Sheppard CL, et al. Invasive pneumococcal disease in UK children <1 year of age in the post-13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine era: what are the risks Now? Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 18;69(1):84–90. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy842