An alternative method for measuring oxidative stress in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: thiol/disulphide homeostasis

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of our study was to evaluate the oxidative stress (OS) in pregnant women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) by evaluating thiol/disulphide homeostasis using an alternative technique.

Methods: A total of 57 pregnant women with ICP were compared with 50 gestational age and body mass index matched controls. A recently defined method was used for the measurement of plasma native-total thiol and disulphide levels. The independent two-sample t test, Mann–Whitney-U test, Chi-square test, binary logistic regression with backward elimination and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed for statistical analyses.

Results: Pregnant women with ICP (n = 57) versus controls (n = 50) had significantly lower serum levels of native thiol (233.8 ± 47.4 μmol/L vs. 308.5 ± 51.7 μmol/L, p < .001), total thiol (258.4 ± 46.5 μmol/L vs. 328.0 ± 52.0 μmol/L, p < .001) and higher levels of disulphide (12.3 ± 3.6 μmol/L vs. 9.7 ± 3.4 μmol/L, p < .001). Binary logistic regression showed that the most important variables related to ICP were native thiol and total thiol. According to the ROC curve, the optimal cut-off level for native thiol was 280.0 μmol/L (sensitivity: 86%, specificity: 84.2%, area under the curve (AUC):0.896, 95% CI: 0.831–0.962, p < .001), and the optimal cut-off level for total thiol was 300.0 μmol/L (sensitivity: 86%, specificity: 80.7%, AUC: 0.883, 95% CI: 0.815–0.951, p < .001).

Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study in the literature exploring thiol/disulphide balance in ICP. We found that thiol/disulphide balance indicate OS in pregnant woman with ICP.

Keywords:

• Thiol
• disulphide
• oxidative stress
• intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

Disclosure statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

The authors declare that they have no financial relationship with any organizaton and they had full control of all primary data and that they agree to allow the Journal to review their data if requested.