324
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

A comparative study of HHHFNC and NCPAP in preventing reintubation in extreme preterm infants born at less than 30-week gestation

&
Pages 3197-3200 | Received 08 Jul 2016, Accepted 09 Aug 2017, Published online: 11 Jan 2018
 

Abstract

Introduction: Despite recent advances in respiratory support, the wide use of antenatal steroids and surfactant-replacement therapy, respiratory problems continue to represent the leading cause of mortality in premature infants during the neonatal period. In the last few years, HHHFNC has been widely adopted as a mode of noninvasive respiratory support for infants with respiratory difficulties. However, data of the safety and efficacy of HHHFNC use in extremely premature infants are scarce. This study will aid in bridging the knowledge gap and sheds light on the efficacy and, more importantly, the safety of HHHFNC as noninvasive respiratory support for extremely premature infants.

Methods: This is a retrospective comparative study conducted at neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital between 1 October 2010 and 31 December 2014. Data were collected from the medical notes and electronic records of the eligible patients. Participants’ total number was 26, 9 patients in nCPAP group while HHHFNC group consisted of 17 patients. The participants’ gestational age was ranging between 24 to 29 + 9 weeks who were supported by either nCPAP or HHHFNC after first extubation. Primary outcome was defined as the need for reintubation within 72-hour immediately postextubation, i.e. failure of noninvasive respiratory support.

Results: Study showed no statistically significant differences in either primary (nCPAP (9/2 [22%]), HHHFNC (17/2 [12%]; p = .59)) or secondary outcomes (Constant need for O2 in the first 4 weeks of life (p = .62), pneumothorax (p = 1.0), nasal injury (p = .35)). p Value for spontaneous bowel perforation was not computed, as there were no affected patients.

Conclusions: The study demonstrates that HHHFNC is similarly safe and efficacious in comparison to nCPAP as noninvasive respiratory support for extremely premature infants’ postextubation.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.